diff mbox series

[v4,06/22] mm/zsmalloc: convert create_page_chain() and its users to use zpdesc

Message ID 20240729112534.3416707-7-alexs@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series mm/zsmalloc: add zpdesc memory descriptor for zswap.zpool | expand

Commit Message

alexs@kernel.org July 29, 2024, 11:25 a.m. UTC
From: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>

Introduce a few helper functions for conversion to convert create_page_chain()
to use zpdesc, then use zpdesc in replace_sub_page() too.

Originally-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
---
 mm/zpdesc.h   |   6 +++
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

Comments

Vishal Moola Aug. 2, 2024, 7:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:25:18PM +0800, alexs@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
> 
> Introduce a few helper functions for conversion to convert create_page_chain()
> to use zpdesc, then use zpdesc in replace_sub_page() too.

As a general note, I've been having trouble keeping track of your helper
functions throughout your patchset. Things get confusing when helper
functions are "add-ons" to patches and are then replaced/rewritten
in various subsequent patches - might just be me though.

> Originally-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
> ---
>  mm/zpdesc.h   |   6 +++
>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
> index 79ec40b03956..2293453f5d57 100644
> --- a/mm/zpdesc.h
> +++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
> @@ -102,4 +102,10 @@ static inline struct zpdesc *pfn_zpdesc(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
>  	return page_zpdesc(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>  }
> +
> +static inline void __zpdesc_set_movable(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
> +					const struct movable_operations *mops)
> +{
> +	__SetPageMovable(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), mops);
> +}
>  #endif
> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> index bbc165cb587d..a8f390beeab8 100644
> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,41 @@ static inline void *zpdesc_kmap_atomic(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>  	return kmap_atomic(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>  }
>  
> +static inline void zpdesc_set_zspage(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
> +				     struct zspage *zspage)
> +{
> +	zpdesc->zspage = zspage;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> +{
> +	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
> +}
> +

I'm not a fan of the names above. IMO, naming should follow some
semblance of consistency regarding their purpose (or have comments
that describe their purpose instead).

At a glance zpdesc_set_zspage() and zpdesc_set_first() sound like they
are doing similar things, but I don't think they serve similar purposes?

> +static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> +{
> +	inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void zpdesc_dec_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> +{
> +	dec_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct zpdesc *alloc_zpdesc(gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp);
> +
> +	return page_zpdesc(page);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void free_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> +{
> +	struct page *page = zpdesc_page(zpdesc);
> +
> +	__free_page(page);
> +}
> +
Alex Shi Aug. 5, 2024, 8:20 a.m. UTC | #2
On 8/3/24 3:09 AM, Vishal Moola wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:25:18PM +0800, alexs@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
>>
>> Introduce a few helper functions for conversion to convert create_page_chain()
>> to use zpdesc, then use zpdesc in replace_sub_page() too.
> 
> As a general note, I've been having trouble keeping track of your helper
> functions throughout your patchset. Things get confusing when helper
> functions are "add-ons" to patches and are then replaced/rewritten
> in various subsequent patches - might just be me though.

Right, maybe too much helper doesn't give necessary help.

> 
>> Originally-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  mm/zpdesc.h   |   6 +++
>>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
>> index 79ec40b03956..2293453f5d57 100644
>> --- a/mm/zpdesc.h
>> +++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
>> @@ -102,4 +102,10 @@ static inline struct zpdesc *pfn_zpdesc(unsigned long pfn)
>>  {
>>  	return page_zpdesc(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>>  }
>> +
>> +static inline void __zpdesc_set_movable(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
>> +					const struct movable_operations *mops)
>> +{
>> +	__SetPageMovable(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), mops);
>> +}
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> index bbc165cb587d..a8f390beeab8 100644
>> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
>> @@ -248,6 +248,41 @@ static inline void *zpdesc_kmap_atomic(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>>  	return kmap_atomic(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline void zpdesc_set_zspage(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
>> +				     struct zspage *zspage)
>> +{
>> +	zpdesc->zspage = zspage;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>> +{
>> +	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
>> +}
>> +
> 
> I'm not a fan of the names above. IMO, naming should follow some
> semblance of consistency regarding their purpose (or have comments
> that describe their purpose instead).
> 
> At a glance zpdesc_set_zspage() and zpdesc_set_first() sound like they
> are doing similar things, but I don't think they serve similar purposes?

zpdesc_set_zspage() only used in one place, a helper maynot needed. Let me remove it.
Same thing for the alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc(), they could be merge into using place.

Thanks
Alex
> 
>> +static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>> +{
>> +	inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void zpdesc_dec_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>> +{
>> +	dec_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct zpdesc *alloc_zpdesc(gfp_t gfp)
>> +{
>> +	struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp);
>> +
>> +	return page_zpdesc(page);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void free_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
>> +{
>> +	struct page *page = zpdesc_page(zpdesc);
>> +
>> +	__free_page(page);
>> +}
>> +
>
Vishal Moola Aug. 8, 2024, 6:25 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 04:20:15PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/3/24 3:09 AM, Vishal Moola wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 07:25:18PM +0800, alexs@kernel.org wrote:
> >> From: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Introduce a few helper functions for conversion to convert create_page_chain()
> >> to use zpdesc, then use zpdesc in replace_sub_page() too.
> > 
> > As a general note, I've been having trouble keeping track of your helper
> > functions throughout your patchset. Things get confusing when helper
> > functions are "add-ons" to patches and are then replaced/rewritten
> > in various subsequent patches - might just be me though.
> 
> Right, maybe too much helper doesn't give necessary help.
> 
> > 
> >> Originally-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >>  mm/zpdesc.h   |   6 +++
> >>  mm/zsmalloc.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>  2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
> >> index 79ec40b03956..2293453f5d57 100644
> >> --- a/mm/zpdesc.h
> >> +++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
> >> @@ -102,4 +102,10 @@ static inline struct zpdesc *pfn_zpdesc(unsigned long pfn)
> >>  {
> >>  	return page_zpdesc(pfn_to_page(pfn));
> >>  }
> >> +
> >> +static inline void __zpdesc_set_movable(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
> >> +					const struct movable_operations *mops)
> >> +{
> >> +	__SetPageMovable(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), mops);
> >> +}
> >>  #endif
> >> diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> index bbc165cb587d..a8f390beeab8 100644
> >> --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
> >> @@ -248,6 +248,41 @@ static inline void *zpdesc_kmap_atomic(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> >>  	return kmap_atomic(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +static inline void zpdesc_set_zspage(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
> >> +				     struct zspage *zspage)
> >> +{
> >> +	zpdesc->zspage = zspage;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> >> +{
> >> +	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
> >> +}
> >> +
> > 
> > I'm not a fan of the names above. IMO, naming should follow some
> > semblance of consistency regarding their purpose (or have comments
> > that describe their purpose instead).
> > 
> > At a glance zpdesc_set_zspage() and zpdesc_set_first() sound like they
> > are doing similar things, but I don't think they serve similar purposes?
> 
> zpdesc_set_zspage() only used in one place, a helper maynot needed. Let me remove it.
> Same thing for the alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc(), they could be merge into using place.

alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc() are fine as is. The helper functions
will be useful whenever memdescs can be allocated on their own, so its
better to introduce it now.

> Thanks
> Alex
> > 
> >> +static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> >> +{
> >> +	inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline void zpdesc_dec_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> >> +{
> >> +	dec_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline struct zpdesc *alloc_zpdesc(gfp_t gfp)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp);
> >> +
> >> +	return page_zpdesc(page);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static inline void free_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct page *page = zpdesc_page(zpdesc);
> >> +
> >> +	__free_page(page);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
Alex Shi Aug. 9, 2024, 1:57 a.m. UTC | #4
On 8/9/24 2:25 AM, Vishal Moola wrote:
>>> I'm not a fan of the names above. IMO, naming should follow some
>>> semblance of consistency regarding their purpose (or have comments
>>> that describe their purpose instead).
>>>
>>> At a glance zpdesc_set_zspage() and zpdesc_set_first() sound like they
>>> are doing similar things, but I don't think they serve similar purposes?
>> zpdesc_set_zspage() only used in one place, a helper maynot needed. Let me remove it.
>> Same thing for the alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc(), they could be merge into using place.
> alloc_zpdesc() and free_zpdesc() are fine as is. The helper functions
> will be useful whenever memdescs can be allocated on their own, so its
> better to introduce it now.

Thanks for suggestion. will recover them in next version, maybe tomorrow if no more comments.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/zpdesc.h b/mm/zpdesc.h
index 79ec40b03956..2293453f5d57 100644
--- a/mm/zpdesc.h
+++ b/mm/zpdesc.h
@@ -102,4 +102,10 @@  static inline struct zpdesc *pfn_zpdesc(unsigned long pfn)
 {
 	return page_zpdesc(pfn_to_page(pfn));
 }
+
+static inline void __zpdesc_set_movable(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
+					const struct movable_operations *mops)
+{
+	__SetPageMovable(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), mops);
+}
 #endif
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index bbc165cb587d..a8f390beeab8 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -248,6 +248,41 @@  static inline void *zpdesc_kmap_atomic(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
 	return kmap_atomic(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
 }
 
+static inline void zpdesc_set_zspage(struct zpdesc *zpdesc,
+				     struct zspage *zspage)
+{
+	zpdesc->zspage = zspage;
+}
+
+static inline void zpdesc_set_first(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
+{
+	SetPagePrivate(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
+}
+
+static inline void zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
+{
+	inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
+}
+
+static inline void zpdesc_dec_zone_page_state(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
+{
+	dec_zone_page_state(zpdesc_page(zpdesc), NR_ZSPAGES);
+}
+
+static inline struct zpdesc *alloc_zpdesc(gfp_t gfp)
+{
+	struct page *page = alloc_page(gfp);
+
+	return page_zpdesc(page);
+}
+
+static inline void free_zpdesc(struct zpdesc *zpdesc)
+{
+	struct page *page = zpdesc_page(zpdesc);
+
+	__free_page(page);
+}
+
 struct zspage {
 	struct {
 		unsigned int huge:HUGE_BITS;
@@ -954,35 +989,35 @@  static void init_zspage(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage)
 }
 
 static void create_page_chain(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
-				struct page *pages[])
+				struct zpdesc *zpdescs[])
 {
 	int i;
-	struct page *page;
-	struct page *prev_page = NULL;
-	int nr_pages = class->pages_per_zspage;
+	struct zpdesc *zpdesc;
+	struct zpdesc *prev_zpdesc = NULL;
+	int nr_zpdescs = class->pages_per_zspage;
 
 	/*
 	 * Allocate individual pages and link them together as:
-	 * 1. all pages are linked together using page->index
-	 * 2. each sub-page point to zspage using page->private
+	 * 1. all pages are linked together using zpdesc->next
+	 * 2. each sub-page point to zspage using zpdesc->zspage
 	 *
-	 * we set PG_private to identify the first page (i.e. no other sub-page
+	 * we set PG_private to identify the first zpdesc (i.e. no other zpdesc
 	 * has this flag set).
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
-		page = pages[i];
-		set_page_private(page, (unsigned long)zspage);
-		page->index = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_zpdescs; i++) {
+		zpdesc = zpdescs[i];
+		zpdesc_set_zspage(zpdesc, zspage);
+		zpdesc->next = NULL;
 		if (i == 0) {
-			zspage->first_zpdesc = page_zpdesc(page);
-			SetPagePrivate(page);
+			zspage->first_zpdesc = zpdesc;
+			zpdesc_set_first(zpdesc);
 			if (unlikely(class->objs_per_zspage == 1 &&
 					class->pages_per_zspage == 1))
 				SetZsHugePage(zspage);
 		} else {
-			prev_page->index = (unsigned long)page;
+			prev_zpdesc->next = zpdesc;
 		}
-		prev_page = page;
+		prev_zpdesc = zpdesc;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -994,7 +1029,7 @@  static struct zspage *alloc_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool,
 					gfp_t gfp)
 {
 	int i;
-	struct page *pages[ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE];
+	struct zpdesc *zpdescs[ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE];
 	struct zspage *zspage = cache_alloc_zspage(pool, gfp);
 
 	if (!zspage)
@@ -1004,25 +1039,25 @@  static struct zspage *alloc_zspage(struct zs_pool *pool,
 	migrate_lock_init(zspage);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < class->pages_per_zspage; i++) {
-		struct page *page;
+		struct zpdesc *zpdesc;
 
-		page = alloc_page(gfp);
-		if (!page) {
+		zpdesc = alloc_zpdesc(gfp);
+		if (!zpdesc) {
 			while (--i >= 0) {
-				dec_zone_page_state(pages[i], NR_ZSPAGES);
-				__ClearPageZsmalloc(pages[i]);
-				__free_page(pages[i]);
+				zpdesc_dec_zone_page_state(zpdescs[i]);
+				__ClearPageZsmalloc(zpdesc_page(zpdescs[i]));
+				free_zpdesc(zpdescs[i]);
 			}
 			cache_free_zspage(pool, zspage);
 			return NULL;
 		}
-		__SetPageZsmalloc(page);
+		__SetPageZsmalloc(zpdesc_page(zpdesc));
 
-		inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_ZSPAGES);
-		pages[i] = page;
+		zpdesc_inc_zone_page_state(zpdesc);
+		zpdescs[i] = zpdesc;
 	}
 
-	create_page_chain(class, zspage, pages);
+	create_page_chain(class, zspage, zpdescs);
 	init_zspage(class, zspage);
 	zspage->pool = pool;
 	zspage->class = class->index;
@@ -1753,26 +1788,28 @@  static void migrate_write_unlock(struct zspage *zspage)
 static const struct movable_operations zsmalloc_mops;
 
 static void replace_sub_page(struct size_class *class, struct zspage *zspage,
-				struct page *newpage, struct page *oldpage)
+				struct zpdesc *newzpdesc, struct zpdesc *oldzpdesc)
 {
-	struct page *page;
-	struct page *pages[ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE] = {NULL, };
+	struct zpdesc *zpdesc;
+	struct zpdesc *zpdescs[ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE] = {NULL, };
+	unsigned int first_obj_offset;
 	int idx = 0;
 
-	page = get_first_page(zspage);
+	zpdesc = get_first_zpdesc(zspage);
 	do {
-		if (page == oldpage)
-			pages[idx] = newpage;
+		if (zpdesc == oldzpdesc)
+			zpdescs[idx] = newzpdesc;
 		else
-			pages[idx] = page;
+			zpdescs[idx] = zpdesc;
 		idx++;
-	} while ((page = get_next_page(page)) != NULL);
+	} while ((zpdesc = get_next_zpdesc(zpdesc)) != NULL);
 
-	create_page_chain(class, zspage, pages);
-	set_first_obj_offset(newpage, get_first_obj_offset(oldpage));
+	create_page_chain(class, zspage, zpdescs);
+	first_obj_offset = get_first_obj_offset(zpdesc_page(oldzpdesc));
+	set_first_obj_offset(zpdesc_page(newzpdesc), first_obj_offset);
 	if (unlikely(ZsHugePage(zspage)))
-		newpage->index = oldpage->index;
-	__SetPageMovable(newpage, &zsmalloc_mops);
+		newzpdesc->handle = oldzpdesc->handle;
+	__zpdesc_set_movable(newzpdesc, &zsmalloc_mops);
 }
 
 static bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
@@ -1845,7 +1882,7 @@  static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *newpage, struct page *page,
 	}
 	kunmap_atomic(s_addr);
 
-	replace_sub_page(class, zspage, newpage, page);
+	replace_sub_page(class, zspage, page_zpdesc(newpage), page_zpdesc(page));
 	/*
 	 * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
 	 * it's okay to release migration_lock.