diff mbox series

[v4,24/26] arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks

Message ID 20240807064110.1003856-25-rppt@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series mm: introduce numa_memblks | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
conchuod/vmtest-for-next-PR fail PR summary
conchuod/patch-24-test-1 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv32_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-2 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_clang_allmodconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-3 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_gcc_allmodconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-4 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-5 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-6 warning .github/scripts/patches/tests/checkpatch.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-7 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/dtb_warn_rv64.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-8 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/header_inline.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-9 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/kdoc.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-10 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/module_param.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-11 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_fixes.sh
conchuod/patch-24-test-12 success .github/scripts/patches/tests/verify_signedoff.sh

Commit Message

Mike Rapoport Aug. 7, 2024, 6:41 a.m. UTC
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>

Until now arch_numa was directly translating firmware NUMA information
to memblock.

Using numa_memblks as an intermediate step has a few advantages:
* alignment with more battle tested x86 implementation
* availability of NUMA emulation
* maintaining node information for not yet populated memory

Adjust a few places in numa_memblks to compile with 32-bit phys_addr_t
and replace current functionality related to numa_add_memblk() and
__node_distance() in arch_numa with the implementation based on
numa_memblks and add functions required by numa_emulation.

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [arm64 + CXL via QEMU]
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/base/Kconfig       |   1 +
 drivers/base/arch_numa.c   | 201 +++++++++++--------------------------
 include/asm-generic/numa.h |   6 +-
 mm/numa_memblks.c          |  17 ++--
 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Aug. 7, 2024, 6:58 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, at 08:41, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
>
> Until now arch_numa was directly translating firmware NUMA information
> to memblock.

I get a link time warning from this:

    WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: numa_set_cpumask+0x24 (section: .text.unlikely) -> early_cpu_to_node (section: .init.text)

> @@ -142,7 +144,7 @@ void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
>  unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_offset);
> 
> -int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
> +int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return cpu_to_node_map[cpu];
>  }

early_cpu_to_node() can no longer be __init here

> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> index c32e0cf23c90..c2b046d1fd82 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> 
>  void __init arch_numa_init(void);
>  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> -void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> -void __init numa_free_distance(void);
>  void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
>  int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
>  void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);

but is still declared as __init in the header, so it is
still put in that section and discarded after boot.

I was confused by this at first, since the 'early' name
seems to imply that you shouldn't call it once the system
is up, but now you do.

     Arnd
Mike Rapoport Aug. 7, 2024, 6:18 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:58:37AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, at 08:41, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> >
> > Until now arch_numa was directly translating firmware NUMA information
> > to memblock.
> 
> I get a link time warning from this:
> 
>     WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: numa_set_cpumask+0x24 (section: .text.unlikely) -> early_cpu_to_node (section: .init.text)

I didn't see this neither in my build tests nor in kbuild reports :/
 
> > @@ -142,7 +144,7 @@ void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
> >  unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly;
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_offset);
> > 
> > -int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
> > +int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
> >  {
> >  	return cpu_to_node_map[cpu];
> >  }
> 
> early_cpu_to_node() can no longer be __init here
> 
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > index c32e0cf23c90..c2b046d1fd82 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > @@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> > 
> >  void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> >  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> > -void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> > -void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> >  void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
> >  int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
> >  void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
> 
> but is still declared as __init in the header, so it is
> still put in that section and discarded after boot.

I believe this should fix it

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
index c2b046d1fd82..e063d6487f66 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
 void __init arch_numa_init(void);
 int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
 void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
-int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
+int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
 void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
 void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 
> I was confused by this at first, since the 'early' name
> seems to imply that you shouldn't call it once the system
> is up, but now you do.

I agree that this is confusing, but that's what x86 does and numa_emulation
uses.
 
>      Arnd
>
Arnd Bergmann Aug. 7, 2024, 6:53 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, at 20:18, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:58:37AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, at 08:41, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>> > 
>> >  void __init arch_numa_init(void);
>> >  int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
>> > -void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
>> > -void __init numa_free_distance(void);
>> >  void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
>> >  int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
>> >  void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
>> 
>> but is still declared as __init in the header, so it is
>> still put in that section and discarded after boot.
>
> I believe this should fix it

Yes, sorry I should have posted the patch as well, this is
what I tested with locally.

     Arnd
Marc Zyngier Nov. 27, 2024, 7:32 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Mike,

Sorry for reviving a rather old thread.

On Wed, 07 Aug 2024 07:41:08 +0100,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> 
> Until now arch_numa was directly translating firmware NUMA information
> to memblock.
> 
> Using numa_memblks as an intermediate step has a few advantages:
> * alignment with more battle tested x86 implementation
> * availability of NUMA emulation
> * maintaining node information for not yet populated memory
> 
> Adjust a few places in numa_memblks to compile with 32-bit phys_addr_t
> and replace current functionality related to numa_add_memblk() and
> __node_distance() in arch_numa with the implementation based on
> numa_memblks and add functions required by numa_emulation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> # for x86_64 and arm64
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> [arm64 + CXL via QEMU]
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/Kconfig       |   1 +
>  drivers/base/arch_numa.c   | 201 +++++++++++--------------------------
>  include/asm-generic/numa.h |   6 +-
>  mm/numa_memblks.c          |  17 ++--
>  4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
>

[...]

>  static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
>  {
>  	int nid;
> -	struct memblock_region *mblk;
> -
> -	/* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */
> -	for_each_mem_region(mblk) {
> -		int mblk_nid = memblock_get_region_node(mblk);
> -		phys_addr_t start = mblk->base;
> -		phys_addr_t end = mblk->base + mblk->size - 1;
> -
> -		if (mblk_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk_nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> -			pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %pap-%pap]\n",
> -				mblk_nid, &start, &end);
> -			return -EINVAL;
> -		}
> -	}
>  

This hunk has the unfortunate side effect of killing my ThunderX
extremely early at boot time, as this sorry excuse for a machine
really relies on the kernel recognising that whatever NUMA information
the FW offers is BS.

Reverting this hunk restores happiness (sort of).

FWIW, I've posted a patch with such revert at [1].

Thanks,

	M.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241127193000.3702637-1-maz@kernel.org
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/base/Kconfig b/drivers/base/Kconfig
index 2b8fd6bb7da0..064eb52ff7e2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/base/Kconfig
@@ -226,6 +226,7 @@  config GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY
 
 config GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA
 	bool
+	select NUMA_MEMBLKS
 	help
 	  Enable support for generic NUMA implementation. Currently, RISC-V
 	  and ARM64 use it.
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
index b6af7475ec44..8d49893c0e94 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
@@ -12,14 +12,12 @@ 
 #include <linux/memblock.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
 
 #include <asm/sections.h>
 
-nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
 static int cpu_to_node_map[NR_CPUS] = { [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE };
 
-static int numa_distance_cnt;
-static u8 *numa_distance;
 bool numa_off;
 
 static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
@@ -28,6 +26,8 @@  static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (str_has_prefix(opt, "off"))
 		numa_off = true;
+	if (!strncmp(opt, "fake=", 5))
+		return numa_emu_cmdline(opt + 5);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_of_node);
 
 #endif
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
 static void numa_update_cpu(unsigned int cpu, bool remove)
 {
 	int nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@  void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	numa_update_cpu(cpu, true);
 }
+#endif
 
 void numa_clear_node(unsigned int cpu)
 {
@@ -142,7 +144,7 @@  void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
 unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_offset);
 
-int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
+int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu)
 {
 	return cpu_to_node_map[cpu];
 }
@@ -187,30 +189,6 @@  void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
 }
 #endif
 
-/**
- * numa_add_memblk() - Set node id to memblk
- * @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk
- * @start: Start address of the new memblk
- * @end:  End address of the new memblk
- *
- * RETURNS:
- * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
- */
-int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pr_err("memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
-			start, (end - 1), nid);
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /*
  * Initialize NODE_DATA for a node on the local memory
  */
@@ -226,116 +204,9 @@  static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn)
 	NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
 }
 
-/*
- * numa_free_distance
- *
- * The current table is freed.
- */
-void __init numa_free_distance(void)
-{
-	size_t size;
-
-	if (!numa_distance)
-		return;
-
-	size = numa_distance_cnt * numa_distance_cnt *
-		sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
-
-	memblock_free(numa_distance, size);
-	numa_distance_cnt = 0;
-	numa_distance = NULL;
-}
-
-/*
- * Create a new NUMA distance table.
- */
-static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
-{
-	size_t size;
-	int i, j;
-
-	size = nr_node_ids * nr_node_ids * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
-	numa_distance = memblock_alloc(size, PAGE_SIZE);
-	if (WARN_ON(!numa_distance))
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	numa_distance_cnt = nr_node_ids;
-
-	/* fill with the default distances */
-	for (i = 0; i < numa_distance_cnt; i++)
-		for (j = 0; j < numa_distance_cnt; j++)
-			numa_distance[i * numa_distance_cnt + j] = i == j ?
-				LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
-
-	pr_debug("Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", numa_distance_cnt);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/**
- * numa_set_distance() - Set inter node NUMA distance from node to node.
- * @from: the 'from' node to set distance
- * @to: the 'to'  node to set distance
- * @distance: NUMA distance
- *
- * Set the distance from node @from to @to to @distance.
- * If distance table doesn't exist, a warning is printed.
- *
- * If @from or @to is higher than the highest known node or lower than zero
- * or @distance doesn't make sense, the call is ignored.
- */
-void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
-{
-	if (!numa_distance) {
-		pr_warn_once("Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt ||
-			from < 0 || to < 0) {
-		pr_warn_once("Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
-			    from, to, distance);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	if ((u8)distance != distance ||
-	    (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
-		pr_warn_once("Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
-			     from, to, distance);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	numa_distance[from * numa_distance_cnt + to] = distance;
-}
-
-/*
- * Return NUMA distance @from to @to
- */
-int __node_distance(int from, int to)
-{
-	if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt)
-		return from == to ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
-	return numa_distance[from * numa_distance_cnt + to];
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_distance);
-
 static int __init numa_register_nodes(void)
 {
 	int nid;
-	struct memblock_region *mblk;
-
-	/* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */
-	for_each_mem_region(mblk) {
-		int mblk_nid = memblock_get_region_node(mblk);
-		phys_addr_t start = mblk->base;
-		phys_addr_t end = mblk->base + mblk->size - 1;
-
-		if (mblk_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk_nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
-			pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %pap-%pap]\n",
-				mblk_nid, &start, &end);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	}
 
 	/* Finally register nodes. */
 	for_each_node_mask(nid, numa_nodes_parsed) {
@@ -360,11 +231,7 @@  static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 	nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 	nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 
-	ret = numa_alloc_distance();
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-
-	ret = init_func();
+	ret = numa_memblks_init(init_func, /* memblock_force_top_down */ false);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto out_free_distance;
 
@@ -382,7 +249,7 @@  static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 
 	return 0;
 out_free_distance:
-	numa_free_distance();
+	numa_reset_distance();
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -412,6 +279,7 @@  static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
 		pr_err("NUMA init failed\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
+	node_set(0, numa_nodes_parsed);
 
 	numa_off = true;
 	return 0;
@@ -454,3 +322,54 @@  void __init arch_numa_init(void)
 
 	numa_init(dummy_numa_init);
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
+void __init numa_emu_update_cpu_to_node(int *emu_nid_to_phys,
+					unsigned int nr_emu_nids)
+{
+	int i, j;
+
+	/*
+	 * Transform cpu_to_node_map table to use emulated nids by
+	 * reverse-mapping phys_nid.  The maps should always exist but fall
+	 * back to zero just in case.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_to_node_map); i++) {
+		if (cpu_to_node_map[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+			continue;
+		for (j = 0; j < nr_emu_nids; j++)
+			if (cpu_to_node_map[i] == emu_nid_to_phys[j])
+				break;
+		cpu_to_node_map[i] = j < nr_emu_nids ? j : 0;
+	}
+}
+
+u64 __init numa_emu_dma_end(void)
+{
+	return PFN_PHYS(memblock_start_of_DRAM() + SZ_4G);
+}
+
+void debug_cpumask_set_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int node, bool enable)
+{
+	struct cpumask *mask;
+
+	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+		return;
+
+	mask = node_to_cpumask_map[node];
+	if (!cpumask_available(mask)) {
+		pr_err("node_to_cpumask_map[%i] NULL\n", node);
+		dump_stack();
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (enable)
+		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
+	else
+		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mask);
+
+	pr_debug("%s cpu %d node %d: mask now %*pbl\n",
+		 enable ? "numa_add_cpu" : "numa_remove_cpu",
+		 cpu, node, cpumask_pr_args(mask));
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_EMU */
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
index c32e0cf23c90..c2b046d1fd82 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@  static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
 
 void __init arch_numa_init(void);
 int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
-void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
-void __init numa_free_distance(void);
 void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid);
 int __init early_cpu_to_node(int cpu);
 void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu);
@@ -51,4 +49,8 @@  static inline int early_cpu_to_node(int cpu) { return 0; }
 
 #endif	/* CONFIG_NUMA */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
+void debug_cpumask_set_cpu(unsigned int cpu, int node, bool enable);
+#endif
+
 #endif	/* __ASM_GENERIC_NUMA_H */
diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index e4358ad92233..c4037faa438b 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -405,9 +405,12 @@  static int __init numa_register_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 		unsigned long pfn_align = node_map_pfn_alignment();
 
 		if (pfn_align && pfn_align < PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
-			pr_warn("Node alignment %LuMB < min %LuMB, rejecting NUMA config\n",
-				PFN_PHYS(pfn_align) >> 20,
-				PFN_PHYS(PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> 20);
+			unsigned long node_align_mb = PFN_PHYS(pfn_align) >> 20;
+
+			unsigned long sect_align_mb = PFN_PHYS(PAGES_PER_SECTION) >> 20;
+
+			pr_warn("Node alignment %luMB < min %luMB, rejecting NUMA config\n",
+				node_align_mb, sect_align_mb);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 	}
@@ -418,18 +421,18 @@  static int __init numa_register_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 int __init numa_memblks_init(int (*init_func)(void),
 			     bool memblock_force_top_down)
 {
+	phys_addr_t max_addr = (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX;
 	int ret;
 
 	nodes_clear(numa_nodes_parsed);
 	nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 	nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 	memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
-	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory,
-				  NUMA_NO_NODE));
-	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.reserved,
+	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, max_addr, &memblock.memory, NUMA_NO_NODE));
+	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, max_addr, &memblock.reserved,
 				  NUMA_NO_NODE));
 	/* In case that parsing SRAT failed. */
-	WARN_ON(memblock_clear_hotplug(0, ULLONG_MAX));
+	WARN_ON(memblock_clear_hotplug(0, max_addr));
 	numa_reset_distance();
 
 	ret = init_func();