| Message ID | 20240822092006.3134096-7-wenst@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | platform/chrome: Introduce DT hardware prober | expand |
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having > multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often > connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals > and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display > panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on > laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device > can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that > information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each > device. > > This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The > current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device > tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe > function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction > of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared" > resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same > time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include > moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or > pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and > requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen > on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based > Lenovo Thinkpad 13S. > > Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks, > this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a > given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of > them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds. > It will then enable the device that responds. > > This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The > status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set > to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is > needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device > drivers running at the same time. ... > --- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ i2c-core-objs := i2c-core-base.o i2c-core-smbus.o > i2c-core-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += i2c-core-acpi.o > i2c-core-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) += i2c-core-slave.o > i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF) += i2c-core-of.o > +i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) += i2c-core-of-prober.o Seems like all the above (except ACPI) have the same issue, i.e. TABs/spaces mixture. ... > + ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs); > + if (!ret) { Why not positive conditional? > + /* > + * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to > + * exist as long as the change is applied. > + */ > + void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs); > + } else { > + /* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */ > + of_changeset_destroy(ocs); > + }
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:02 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having > > multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often > > connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals > > and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display > > panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on > > laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device > > can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that > > information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each > > device. > > > > This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The > > current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device > > tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe > > function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction > > of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared" > > resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same > > time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include > > moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or > > pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and > > requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen > > on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based > > Lenovo Thinkpad 13S. > > > > Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks, > > this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a > > given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of > > them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds. > > It will then enable the device that responds. > > > > This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The > > status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set > > to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is > > needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device > > drivers running at the same time. > > ... > > > --- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ i2c-core-objs := i2c-core-base.o i2c-core-smbus.o > > i2c-core-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += i2c-core-acpi.o > > i2c-core-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) += i2c-core-slave.o > > i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF) += i2c-core-of.o > > +i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) += i2c-core-of-prober.o > > Seems like all the above (except ACPI) have the same issue, i.e. TABs/spaces > mixture. I was lazy and just copied the previous line. I'll fix the new line for now. > ... > > > + ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs); > > + if (!ret) { > > Why not positive conditional? No real reason. I suppose having the error condition come first is more common. Not sure if it makes any difference in this case though? Thanks ChenYu > > + /* > > + * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to > > + * exist as long as the change is applied. > > + */ > > + void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs); > > + } else { > > + /* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */ > > + of_changeset_destroy(ocs); > > + } > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 04:40:36PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:02 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 05:19:59PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: ... > > > + ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs); > > > + if (!ret) { > > > > Why not positive conditional? > > No real reason. I suppose having the error condition come first is more > common. Yes, when you have something like if (err) { ... return err; } else { ... } But you don't. That's why I commented on this. > Not sure if it makes any difference in this case though? ! is hard to read by a human being, easy to make a mistake in the brain of reader and with inverted logic the code reading becomes harder. So, it's pure about cognitive function. > > > + /* > > > + * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to > > > + * exist as long as the change is applied. > > > + */ > > > + void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs); > > > + } else { > > > + /* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */ > > > + of_changeset_destroy(ocs); > > > + }
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/Makefile index 3f71ce4711e3..0c543c742895 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile +++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ i2c-core-objs := i2c-core-base.o i2c-core-smbus.o i2c-core-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += i2c-core-acpi.o i2c-core-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) += i2c-core-slave.o i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF) += i2c-core-of.o +i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) += i2c-core-of-prober.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS) += i2c-smbus.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV) += i2c-dev.o diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..bb7b231201b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Linux I2C core OF component prober code + * + * Copyright (C) 2024 Google LLC + */ + +#include <linux/cleanup.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/dev_printk.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> + +/* + * Some devices, such as Google Hana Chromebooks, are produced by multiple + * vendors each using their preferred components. Such components are all + * in the device tree. Instead of having all of them enabled and having each + * driver separately try and probe its device while fighting over shared + * resources, they can be marked as "fail-needs-probe" and have a prober + * figure out which one is actually used beforehand. + * + * This prober assumes such drop-in parts are on the same I2C bus, have + * non-conflicting addresses, and can be directly probed by seeing which + * address responds. + * + * TODO: + * - Support handling common regulators and GPIOs. + * - Support I2C muxes + */ + +static struct device_node *i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(struct device *dev, const char *type) +{ + struct device_node *node __free(device_node) = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, type); + if (!node) + return dev_err_ptr_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "Could not find %s device node\n", type); + + struct device_node *i2c_node __free(device_node) = of_get_parent(node); + if (!of_node_name_eq(i2c_node, "i2c")) + return dev_err_ptr_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "%s device isn't on I2C bus\n", type); + + if (!of_device_is_available(i2c_node)) + return dev_err_ptr_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "I2C controller not available\n"); + + return no_free_ptr(i2c_node); +} + +static int i2c_of_probe_enable_node(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node) +{ + int ret; + + dev_info(dev, "Enabling %pOF\n", node); + + struct of_changeset *ocs __free(kfree) = kzalloc(sizeof(*ocs), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ocs) + return -ENOMEM; + + of_changeset_init(ocs); + ret = of_changeset_update_prop_string(ocs, node, "status", "okay"); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = of_changeset_apply(ocs); + if (!ret) { + /* + * ocs is intentionally kept around as it needs to + * exist as long as the change is applied. + */ + void *ptr __always_unused = no_free_ptr(ocs); + } else { + /* ocs needs to be explicitly cleaned up before being freed. */ + of_changeset_destroy(ocs); + } + + return ret; +} + +/** + * i2c_of_probe_component() - probe for devices of "type" on the same i2c bus + * @dev: &struct device of the caller, only used for dev_* printk messages + * @type: a string to match the device node name prefix to probe for + * + * Probe for possible I2C components of the same "type" on the same I2C bus + * that have their status marked as "fail". + * + * Assumes that across the entire device tree the only instances of nodes + * prefixed with "type" are the ones that need handling for second source + * components. In other words, if type is "touchscreen", then all device + * nodes named "touchscreen*" are the ones that need probing. There cannot + * be another "touchscreen" node that is already enabled. + * + * Assumes that for each "type" of component, only one actually exists. In + * other words, only one matching and existing device will be enabled. + * + * Context: Process context only. Does non-atomic I2C transfers. + * Should only be used from a driver probe function, as the function + * can return -EPROBE_DEFER if the I2C adapter is unavailable. + * Return: 0 on success or no-op, error code otherwise. + * A no-op can happen when it seems like the device tree already + * has components of the type to be probed already enabled. This + * can happen when the device tree had not been updated to mark + * the status of the to-be-probed components as "fail". Or this + * function was already run with the same parameters and succeeded + * in enabling a component. The latter could happen if the user + * had multiple types of components to probe, and one of them down + * the list caused a deferred probe. This is expected behavior. + */ +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const char *type) +{ + struct i2c_adapter *i2c; + int ret; + + struct device_node *i2c_node __free(device_node) = i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(dev, type); + if (IS_ERR(i2c_node)) + return PTR_ERR(i2c_node); + + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(i2c_node, node) { + if (!of_node_name_prefix(node, type)) + continue; + if (!of_device_is_available(node)) + continue; + + /* + * Device tree has component already enabled. Either the + * device tree isn't supported or we already probed once. + */ + return 0; + } + + i2c = of_get_i2c_adapter_by_node(i2c_node); + if (!i2c) + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EPROBE_DEFER, "Couldn't get I2C adapter\n"); + + ret = 0; + for_each_child_of_node_scoped(i2c_node, node) { + union i2c_smbus_data data; + u32 addr; + + if (!of_node_name_prefix(node, type)) + continue; + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &addr)) + continue; + if (i2c_smbus_xfer(i2c, addr, 0, I2C_SMBUS_READ, 0, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &data) < 0) + continue; + + /* Found a device that is responding */ + ret = i2c_of_probe_enable_node(dev, node); + break; + } + + i2c_put_adapter(i2c); + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_of_probe_component); diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h index 377def497298..4c48ea93ec49 100644 --- a/include/linux/i2c.h +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h @@ -1030,6 +1030,10 @@ const struct of_device_id int of_i2c_get_board_info(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node, struct i2c_board_info *info); +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC) +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const char *type); +#endif + #else static inline struct i2c_client *of_find_i2c_device_by_node(struct device_node *node)
Some devices are designed and manufactured with some components having multiple drop-in replacement options. These components are often connected to the mainboard via ribbon cables, having the same signals and pin assignments across all options. These may include the display panel and touchscreen on laptops and tablets, and the trackpad on laptops. Sometimes which component option is used in a particular device can be detected by some firmware provided identifier, other times that information is not available, and the kernel has to try to probe each device. This change attempts to make the "probe each device" case cleaner. The current approach is to have all options added and enabled in the device tree. The kernel would then bind each device and run each driver's probe function. This works, but has been broken before due to the introduction of asynchronous probing, causing multiple instances requesting "shared" resources, such as pinmuxes, GPIO pins, interrupt lines, at the same time, with only one instance succeeding. Work arounds for these include moving the pinmux to the parent I2C controller, using GPIO hogs or pinmux settings to keep the GPIO pins in some fixed configuration, and requesting the interrupt line very late. Such configurations can be seen on the MT8183 Krane Chromebook tablets, and the Qualcomm sc8280xp-based Lenovo Thinkpad 13S. Instead of this delicate dance between drivers and device tree quirks, this change introduces a simple I2C component probe. function For a given class of devices on the same I2C bus, it will go through all of them, doing a simple I2C read transfer and see which one of them responds. It will then enable the device that responds. This requires some minor modifications in the existing device tree. The status for all the device nodes for the component options must be set to "failed-needs-probe". This makes it clear that some mechanism is needed to enable one of them, and also prevents the prober and device drivers running at the same time. Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org> --- Changes since v4: - Split code into helper functions - Use scoped helpers and __free() to reduce error path Changes since v3: - Complete kernel-doc - Return different error if I2C controller is disabled - Expand comment to explain assumptions and constraints - Split for-loop finding target node and operations on target node - Add missing i2c_put_adapter() - Move prober code to separate file Rob also asked why there was a limitation of "exactly one touchscreen will be enabled across the whole tree". The use case this prober currently targets is a component on consumer electronics (tablet or laptop) being swapped out due to cost or supply reasons. Designs with multiple components of the same type are pretty rare. The way the next patch is written also assumes this for efficiency reasons. Changes since v2: - New patch split out from "of: Introduce hardware prober driver" - Addressed Rob's comments - Move i2c prober to i2c subsystem - Use of_node_is_available() to check if node is enabled. - Use OF changeset API to update status property - Addressed Andy's comments - Probe function now accepts "struct device *dev" instead to reduce line length and dereferences - Move "ret = 0" to just before for_each_child_of_node(i2c_node, node) --- drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 + drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/i2c.h | 4 + 3 files changed, 162 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of-prober.c