diff mbox series

nvdimm: Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool()

Message ID 20240731191312.1710417-26-robh@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 795191854a8ff04a195c1cab856a61bd5677dda9
Delegated to: Ira Weiny
Headers show
Series nvdimm: Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() | expand

Commit Message

Rob Herring (Arm) July 31, 2024, 7:13 p.m. UTC
Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() to test
property presence and read boolean properties rather than
of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
callers of of_find_property() and similar functions.
of_(find|get)_property() leak the DT struct property and data pointers
which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c | 2 +-
 drivers/nvmem/layouts.c  | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Dave Jiang Aug. 7, 2024, 6:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On 7/31/24 12:13 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() to test
> property presence and read boolean properties rather than
> of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
> callers of of_find_property() and similar functions.
> of_(find|get)_property() leak the DT struct property and data pointers
> which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/nvmem/layouts.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> index 403384f25ce3..b4a1cf70e8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>  
> -	is_volatile = !!of_find_property(np, "volatile", NULL);
> +	is_volatile = of_property_read_bool(np, "volatile");
>  	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registering %s regions from %pOF\n",
>  			is_volatile ? "volatile" : "non-volatile",  np);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> index 77a4119efea8..65d39e19f6ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int nvmem_layout_bus_populate(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Make sure it has a compatible property */
> -	if (!of_get_property(layout_dn, "compatible", NULL)) {
> +	if (!of_property_present(layout_dn, "compatible")) {
>  		pr_debug("%s() - skipping %pOF, no compatible prop\n",
>  			 __func__, layout_dn);
>  		return 0;
Rob Herring (Arm) Sept. 3, 2024, 7:17 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 2:14 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() to test
> property presence and read boolean properties rather than
> of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
> callers of of_find_property() and similar functions.
> of_(find|get)_property() leak the DT struct property and data pointers
> which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/nvmem/layouts.c  | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Ping

> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> index 403384f25ce3..b4a1cf70e8b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         }
>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>
> -       is_volatile = !!of_find_property(np, "volatile", NULL);
> +       is_volatile = of_property_read_bool(np, "volatile");
>         dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registering %s regions from %pOF\n",
>                         is_volatile ? "volatile" : "non-volatile",  np);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> index 77a4119efea8..65d39e19f6ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int nvmem_layout_bus_populate(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>         int ret;
>
>         /* Make sure it has a compatible property */
> -       if (!of_get_property(layout_dn, "compatible", NULL)) {
> +       if (!of_property_present(layout_dn, "compatible")) {
>                 pr_debug("%s() - skipping %pOF, no compatible prop\n",
>                          __func__, layout_dn);
>                 return 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Ira Weiny Sept. 4, 2024, 1:50 p.m. UTC | #3
Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 2:14 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Use of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool() to test
> > property presence and read boolean properties rather than
> > of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
> > callers of of_find_property() and similar functions.
> > of_(find|get)_property() leak the DT struct property and data pointers
> > which is a problem for dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c | 2 +-
> >  drivers/nvmem/layouts.c  | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Ping

It is soaking for 6.12.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm.git/log/?h=libnvdimm-for-next

Thanks,
Ira

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> > index 403384f25ce3..b4a1cf70e8b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >         }
> >         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
> >
> > -       is_volatile = !!of_find_property(np, "volatile", NULL);
> > +       is_volatile = of_property_read_bool(np, "volatile");
> >         dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registering %s regions from %pOF\n",
> >                         is_volatile ? "volatile" : "non-volatile",  np);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> > index 77a4119efea8..65d39e19f6ec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int nvmem_layout_bus_populate(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> >         int ret;
> >
> >         /* Make sure it has a compatible property */
> > -       if (!of_get_property(layout_dn, "compatible", NULL)) {
> > +       if (!of_property_present(layout_dn, "compatible")) {
> >                 pr_debug("%s() - skipping %pOF, no compatible prop\n",
> >                          __func__, layout_dn);
> >                 return 0;
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
index 403384f25ce3..b4a1cf70e8b7 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/of_pmem.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@  static int of_pmem_region_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
 
-	is_volatile = !!of_find_property(np, "volatile", NULL);
+	is_volatile = of_property_read_bool(np, "volatile");
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registering %s regions from %pOF\n",
 			is_volatile ? "volatile" : "non-volatile",  np);
 
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
index 77a4119efea8..65d39e19f6ec 100644
--- a/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/layouts.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@  static int nvmem_layout_bus_populate(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
 	int ret;
 
 	/* Make sure it has a compatible property */
-	if (!of_get_property(layout_dn, "compatible", NULL)) {
+	if (!of_property_present(layout_dn, "compatible")) {
 		pr_debug("%s() - skipping %pOF, no compatible prop\n",
 			 __func__, layout_dn);
 		return 0;