Message ID | 20240903192524.4158713-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | net: xilinx: axienet: Enable adaptive IRQ coalescing with DIM | expand |
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:25:22PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: > To improve performance without sacrificing latency under low load, > enable DIM. While I appreciate not having to write the library myself, I > do think there are many unusual aspects to DIM, as detailed in the last > patch. > > This series depends on [1]. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240903180059.4134461-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/ Hi Sean, Unfortunately the CI doesn't understand dependencies, and so it is unable to apply this patchset :( I would suggest bundling patches for the same driver for net-next in a single patchset. And in any case, only having one active at any given time.
On 9/4/24 12:35, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:25:22PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: >> To improve performance without sacrificing latency under low load, >> enable DIM. While I appreciate not having to write the library myself, I >> do think there are many unusual aspects to DIM, as detailed in the last >> patch. >> >> This series depends on [1]. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240903180059.4134461-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/ > > Hi Sean, > > Unfortunately the CI doesn't understand dependencies, > and so it is unable to apply this patchset :( > > I would suggest bundling patches for the same driver for net-next > in a single patchset. And in any case, only having one active > at any given time. > Well, I would normally do so, but that patch is a fix and this series is an improvement. So that one goes into net and this one goes into net-next. I've been advised in the past to split up independent patches so they can be reviewed/applied individually. --Sean
On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 10:27:00AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: > On 9/4/24 12:35, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:25:22PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote: > >> To improve performance without sacrificing latency under low load, > >> enable DIM. While I appreciate not having to write the library myself, I > >> do think there are many unusual aspects to DIM, as detailed in the last > >> patch. > >> > >> This series depends on [1]. > >> > >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240903180059.4134461-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/ > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > Unfortunately the CI doesn't understand dependencies, > > and so it is unable to apply this patchset :( > > > > I would suggest bundling patches for the same driver for net-next > > in a single patchset. And in any case, only having one active > > at any given time. > > > > Well, I would normally do so, but that patch is a fix and this series is > an improvement. So that one goes into net and this one goes into net-next. > > I've been advised in the past to split up independent patches so they can be > reviewed/applied individually. Thanks Sean, Understood. Given the first point, which I had missed earlier, I'd would have suggested marking this patch-set as an RFC, then reposting it once the dependency hits net-next (via net).