diff mbox series

[bpf-next/net,v5,3/3] selftests/bpf: Add mptcp subflow subtest

Message ID 20240910-upstream-bpf-next-20240506-mptcp-subflow-test-v5-3-2c664a7da47c@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Matthieu Baerts
Headers show
Series selftests/bpf: new MPTCP subflow subtest | expand

Commit Message

Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Sept. 10, 2024, 2:13 p.m. UTC 
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

This patch adds a subtest named test_subflow in test_mptcp to load and
verify the newly added MPTCP subflow BPF program. To goal is to make
sure it is possible to set different socket options per subflows, while
the userspace socket interface only lets the application to set the same
socket options for the whole MPTCP connection and its multiple subflows.

To check that, a client and a server are started in a dedicated netns,
with veth interfaces to simulate multiple paths. They will exchange data
to allow the creation of an additional subflow.

When the different subflows are being created, the new MPTCP subflow BPF
program will set some socket options: marks and TCP CC. The validation
is done by the same program, when the userspace checks the value of the
modified socket options. On the userspace side, it will see that the
default values are still being used on the MPTCP connection, while the
BPF program will see different options set per subflow of the same MPTCP
connection.

Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/76
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
---
Notes:
 - v2 -> v3:
   - Use './mptcp_pm_nl_ctl' instead of 'ip mptcp', not supported by the
     BPF CI running IPRoute 5.5.0.
   - Use SYS_NOFAIL() in _ss_search() instead of calling system()
 - v3 -> v4:
   - Drop './mptcp_pm_nl_ctl', but skip this new test if 'ip mptcp' is
     not supported.
 - v4 -> v5:
   - Note that this new test is no longer skipped on the BPF CI, because
     'ip mptcp' is now supported after the switch from Ubuntu 20.04 to
     22.04.
   - Update the commit message, reflecting the latest version.
   - The validations are no longer done using 'ss', but using the new
     BPF program added in the previous patch, to reduce the use of
     external dependences.
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)

Comments

Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Sept. 10, 2024, 2:55 p.m. UTC | #1 
Hello,

On 10/09/2024 16:13, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> 
> This patch adds a subtest named test_subflow in test_mptcp to load and
> verify the newly added MPTCP subflow BPF program. To goal is to make
> sure it is possible to set different socket options per subflows, while
> the userspace socket interface only lets the application to set the same
> socket options for the whole MPTCP connection and its multiple subflows.
> 
> To check that, a client and a server are started in a dedicated netns,
> with veth interfaces to simulate multiple paths. They will exchange data
> to allow the creation of an additional subflow.

(...)

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> index d2ca32fa3b21..c30f032edaca 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
> @@ -335,10 +339,132 @@ static void test_mptcpify(void)
>  	close(cgroup_fd);
>  }

(...)

> +static void wait_for_new_subflows(int fd)
> +{
> +	socklen_t len;
> +	u8 subflows;
> +	int err, i;
> +
> +	len = sizeof(subflows);
> +	/* Wait max 1 sec for new subflows to be created */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> +		err = getsockopt(fd, SOL_MPTCP, MPTCP_INFO, &subflows, &len);
> +		if (!err && subflows > 0)
> +			break;
> +
> +		sleep(0.1);

As reported by the CI, we are not in Python, usleep() should be used
here. I missed that one during my review. I will send a new version with
the fix tomorrow. Sorry for the noise.

Cheers,
Matt
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
index d2ca32fa3b21..c30f032edaca 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/mptcp.c
@@ -9,8 +9,12 @@ 
 #include "network_helpers.h"
 #include "mptcp_sock.skel.h"
 #include "mptcpify.skel.h"
+#include "mptcp_subflow.skel.h"
 
 #define NS_TEST "mptcp_ns"
+#define ADDR_1	"10.0.1.1"
+#define ADDR_2	"10.0.1.2"
+#define PORT_1	10001
 
 #ifndef IPPROTO_MPTCP
 #define IPPROTO_MPTCP 262
@@ -335,10 +339,132 @@  static void test_mptcpify(void)
 	close(cgroup_fd);
 }
 
+static int endpoint_init(char *flags)
+{
+	SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link add veth1 type veth peer name veth2", NS_TEST);
+	SYS(fail, "ip -net %s addr add %s/24 dev veth1", NS_TEST, ADDR_1);
+	SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev veth1 up", NS_TEST);
+	SYS(fail, "ip -net %s addr add %s/24 dev veth2", NS_TEST, ADDR_2);
+	SYS(fail, "ip -net %s link set dev veth2 up", NS_TEST);
+	if (SYS_NOFAIL("ip -net %s mptcp endpoint add %s %s", NS_TEST, ADDR_2, flags)) {
+		printf("'ip mptcp' not supported, skip this test.\n");
+		test__skip();
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+fail:
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static void wait_for_new_subflows(int fd)
+{
+	socklen_t len;
+	u8 subflows;
+	int err, i;
+
+	len = sizeof(subflows);
+	/* Wait max 1 sec for new subflows to be created */
+	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+		err = getsockopt(fd, SOL_MPTCP, MPTCP_INFO, &subflows, &len);
+		if (!err && subflows > 0)
+			break;
+
+		sleep(0.1);
+	}
+}
+
+static void run_subflow(void)
+{
+	int server_fd, client_fd, err;
+	char new[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
+	char cc[TCP_CA_NAME_MAX];
+	unsigned int mark;
+	socklen_t len;
+
+	server_fd = start_mptcp_server(AF_INET, ADDR_1, PORT_1, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(server_fd, "start_mptcp_server"))
+		return;
+
+	client_fd = connect_to_fd(server_fd, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(client_fd, "connect_to_fd"))
+		goto close_server;
+
+	send_byte(client_fd);
+	wait_for_new_subflows(client_fd);
+
+	len = sizeof(mark);
+	err = getsockopt(client_fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_MARK, &mark, &len);
+	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "getsockopt(client_fd, SO_MARK)"))
+		ASSERT_EQ(mark, 0, "mark");
+
+	len = sizeof(new);
+	err = getsockopt(client_fd, SOL_TCP, TCP_CONGESTION, new, &len);
+	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "getsockopt(client_fd, TCP_CONGESTION)")) {
+		get_msk_ca_name(cc);
+		ASSERT_STREQ(new, cc, "cc");
+	}
+
+	close(client_fd);
+close_server:
+	close(server_fd);
+}
+
+static void test_subflow(void)
+{
+	int cgroup_fd, prog_fd, err;
+	struct mptcp_subflow *skel;
+	struct nstoken *nstoken;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/mptcp_subflow");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(cgroup_fd, "join_cgroup: mptcp_subflow"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = mptcp_subflow__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_load: mptcp_subflow"))
+		goto close_cgroup;
+
+	skel->bss->pid = getpid();
+
+	err = mptcp_subflow__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach: mptcp_subflow"))
+		goto skel_destroy;
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.mptcp_subflow);
+	err = bpf_prog_attach(prog_fd, cgroup_fd, BPF_CGROUP_SOCK_OPS, 0);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "prog_attach"))
+		goto skel_destroy;
+
+	nstoken = create_netns();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(nstoken, "create_netns: mptcp_subflow"))
+		goto skel_destroy;
+
+	if (endpoint_init("subflow") < 0)
+		goto close_netns;
+
+	link = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs._getsockopt_subflow,
+					  cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "getsockopt prog"))
+		goto close_netns;
+
+	run_subflow();
+
+	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+close_netns:
+	cleanup_netns(nstoken);
+skel_destroy:
+	mptcp_subflow__destroy(skel);
+close_cgroup:
+	close(cgroup_fd);
+}
+
 void test_mptcp(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("base"))
 		test_base();
 	if (test__start_subtest("mptcpify"))
 		test_mptcpify();
+	if (test__start_subtest("subflow"))
+		test_subflow();
 }