diff mbox series

[v6,6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes

Message ID 20240930125438.2501050-7-john.g.garry@oracle.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series block atomic writes for xfs | expand

Commit Message

John Garry Sept. 30, 2024, 12:54 p.m. UTC
Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
we can only write a single FS block.

For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Darrick J. Wong Sept. 30, 2024, 4:41 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:54:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
> we can only write a single FS block.
> 
> For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
> FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
> ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
>  	struct xfs_buftarg      *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
>  	size_t			count = iov_iter_count(from);
>  
> +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> +		if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +	}

Does xfs_file_write_iter need a catch-all so that we don't fall back to
buffered write for a directio write that returns ENOTBLK?

	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
		/*
		 * Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
		 * write *only* in the case that we're doing a reflink
		 * CoW.  In all other directio scenarios we do not
		 * allow an operation to fall back to buffered mode.
		 */
		ret = xfs_file_dio_write(iocb, from);
		if (ret != -ENOTBLK || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
			return ret;
	}

IIRC iomap_dio_rw can return ENOTBLK if pagecache invalidation fails for
the region that we're trying to directio write.

--D

> +
>  	/* direct I/O must be aligned to device logical sector size */
>  	if ((iocb->ki_pos | count) & target->bt_logical_sectormask)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
>
John Garry Oct. 1, 2024, 1:22 p.m. UTC | #2
On 30/09/2024 17:41, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:54:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
>> Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
>> we can only write a single FS block.
>>
>> For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
>> FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
>> ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
>> @@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
>>   	struct xfs_buftarg      *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
>>   	size_t			count = iov_iter_count(from);
>>   
>> +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
>> +		if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
> 
> Does xfs_file_write_iter need a catch-all so that we don't fall back to
> buffered write for a directio write that returns ENOTBLK?
> 
> 	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
> 		/*
> 		 * Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
> 		 * write *only* in the case that we're doing a reflink
> 		 * CoW.  In all other directio scenarios we do not
> 		 * allow an operation to fall back to buffered mode.
> 		 */
> 		ret = xfs_file_dio_write(iocb, from);
> 		if (ret != -ENOTBLK || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
> 			return ret;
> 	}
> 
> IIRC iomap_dio_rw can return ENOTBLK if pagecache invalidation fails for
> the region that we're trying to directio write.

I see where you are talking about. There is also a ENOTBLK from 
unaligned write for CoW, but we would not see that.

But I was thinking to use a common helper to catch this, like 
generic_write_checks_count() [which is called on the buffered IO path]:

----8<-----

diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 32b476bf9be0..222f25c6439c 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -1774,6 +1774,10 @@ int generic_write_checks_count(struct kiocb 
*iocb, loff_t *count)
  	if (!*count)
  		return 0;

+	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC &&
+	    !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_APPEND)
  		iocb->ki_pos = i_size_read(inode);

---->8-----

But we keep the IOCB_DIRECT flag for the buffered IO fallback (so no good).

Another option would be:

----8<-----

--- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
@@ -679,7 +679,12 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter 
*iter,
  			if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
  				trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
  								iomi.len);
-				ret = -ENOTBLK;
+				if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
+					if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
+						ret = -EAGAIN;
+				}else {
+					ret = -ENOTBLK;
+				}
  			}
  			goto out_free_dio;
  		}
---->8-----

I suggest that, as other FSes (like ext4) handle -ENOTBLK and would need 
to be changed similar to XFS. But I am not sure if changing the error 
code from -ENOTBLK for IOCB_ATOMIC is ok.

Let me know what you think about possible alternative solutions.

Thanks,
John
Darrick J. Wong Oct. 1, 2024, 2:48 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 02:22:23PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 30/09/2024 17:41, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:54:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
> > > we can only write a single FS block.
> > > 
> > > For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
> > > FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
> > > ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
> > >   	struct xfs_buftarg      *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> > >   	size_t			count = iov_iter_count(from);
> > > +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> > > +		if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
> > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > +		if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
> > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > +	}
> > 
> > Does xfs_file_write_iter need a catch-all so that we don't fall back to
> > buffered write for a directio write that returns ENOTBLK?
> > 
> > 	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
> > 		/*
> > 		 * Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
> > 		 * write *only* in the case that we're doing a reflink
> > 		 * CoW.  In all other directio scenarios we do not
> > 		 * allow an operation to fall back to buffered mode.
> > 		 */
> > 		ret = xfs_file_dio_write(iocb, from);
> > 		if (ret != -ENOTBLK || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
> > 			return ret;
> > 	}
> > 
> > IIRC iomap_dio_rw can return ENOTBLK if pagecache invalidation fails for
> > the region that we're trying to directio write.
> 
> I see where you are talking about. There is also a ENOTBLK from unaligned
> write for CoW, but we would not see that.
> 
> But I was thinking to use a common helper to catch this, like
> generic_write_checks_count() [which is called on the buffered IO path]:
> 
> ----8<-----
> 
> diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> index 32b476bf9be0..222f25c6439c 100644
> --- a/fs/read_write.c
> +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> @@ -1774,6 +1774,10 @@ int generic_write_checks_count(struct kiocb *iocb,
> loff_t *count)
>  	if (!*count)
>  		return 0;
> 
> +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC &&
> +	    !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_APPEND)
>  		iocb->ki_pos = i_size_read(inode);
> 
> ---->8-----
> 
> But we keep the IOCB_DIRECT flag for the buffered IO fallback (so no good).
> 
> Another option would be:
> 
> ----8<-----
> 
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -679,7 +679,12 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter
> *iter,
>  			if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
>  				trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
>  								iomi.len);
> -				ret = -ENOTBLK;
> +				if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> +					if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
> +						ret = -EAGAIN;

I don't follow the logic here -- all the error codes except for EAGAIN
are squashed into ENOTBLK, so why would we let them through for an
atomic write?

	if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
		trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
						iomi.len);

		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
			/*
			 * folio invalidation failed, maybe this is
			 * transient, unlock and see if the caller
			 * tries again
			 */
			return -EAGAIN;
		} else {
			/* fall back to buffered write */
			return -ENOTBLK;
		}
	}

--D

> +				}else {
> +					ret = -ENOTBLK;
> +				}
>  			}
>  			goto out_free_dio;
>  		}
> ---->8-----
> 
> I suggest that, as other FSes (like ext4) handle -ENOTBLK and would need to
> be changed similar to XFS. But I am not sure if changing the error code from
> -ENOTBLK for IOCB_ATOMIC is ok.
> 
> Let me know what you think about possible alternative solutions.
> 
> Thanks,
> John
>
John Garry Oct. 1, 2024, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #4
On 01/10/2024 15:48, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
>> @@ -679,7 +679,12 @@ __iomap_dio_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter
>> *iter,
>>   			if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
>>   				trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
>>   								iomi.len);
>> -				ret = -ENOTBLK;
>> +				if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
>> +					if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
>> +						ret = -EAGAIN;
> I don't follow the logic here -- all the error codes except for EAGAIN
> are squashed into ENOTBLK, so why would we let them through for an
> atomic write?

Right, the errors apart from EAGAIN are normally squashed to ENOTBLK; 
but I thought that since we would not do this for IOCB_ATOMIC, then just 
return the actual error from kiocb_invalidate_pages() - apart from 
ENOTBLK, which has this special treatment.

But I can always just return EAGAIN for IOCB_ATOMIC when 
kiocb_invalidate_pages() errors, as you suggest below.

> 
> 	if (ret != -EAGAIN) {
> 		trace_iomap_dio_invalidate_fail(inode, iomi.pos,
> 						iomi.len);
> 
> 		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> 			/*
> 			 * folio invalidation failed, maybe this is
> 			 * transient, unlock and see if the caller
> 			 * tries again
> 			 */
> 			return -EAGAIN;
> 		} else {
> 			/* fall back to buffered write */
> 			return -ENOTBLK;
> 		}
> 	}

Cheers,
John
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -688,6 +688,13 @@  xfs_file_dio_write(
 	struct xfs_buftarg      *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
 	size_t			count = iov_iter_count(from);
 
+	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
+		if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	/* direct I/O must be aligned to device logical sector size */
 	if ((iocb->ki_pos | count) & target->bt_logical_sectormask)
 		return -EINVAL;