diff mbox series

[v5,1/4] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint

Message ID 1723534943-28499-2-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Add dbi2 and atu for i.MX8M PCIe EP | expand

Commit Message

Richard Zhu Aug. 13, 2024, 7:42 a.m. UTC
Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.

For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
driver. This method is not good.

In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit is
preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.

These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according base
addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are provided, i.MX
PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.

Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml  | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Aug. 13, 2024, 8:52 a.m. UTC | #1
On 13/08/2024 09:42, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> 
> For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> driver. This method is not good.
> 
> In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit is
> preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> 
> These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according base
> addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are provided, i.MX
> PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>

This is some random tagging! You add tags, then drop, then add other
people. No, it does not work like this.

Where was this tag given?

Where are other tags?

Why did you drop them? Why this is not explained?

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Rob Herring Aug. 13, 2024, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:42:20 +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> 
> For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> driver. This method is not good.
> 
> In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit is
> preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> 
> These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according base
> addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are provided, i.MX
> PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml  | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Missing tags:

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Richard Zhu Aug. 14, 2024, 1:49 a.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Sent: 2024年8月14日 0:33
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: shawnguo@kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> conor+dt@kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel@pengutronix.de; l.stach@pengutronix.de; krzk+dt@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and
> "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint
> 
> 
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 15:42:20 +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> >
> > For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> > driver. This method is not good.
> >
> > In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> > Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit
> > is preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> >
> > These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> > properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according
> > base addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are
> > provided, i.MX PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml  | 13
> > +++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
> Missing tags:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Hi Rob:
Oops, I'm really sorry about that I missing this reviewed-by tag in v5 by
 my mistake.
Thank you very much for your notice and kindly help.

Hi Shawn:
Can you help to pick-up Rob's reviewed-by tag?
Thanks in advanced.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> 
>
Shawn Guo Aug. 31, 2024, 12:59 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:49:30AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> > 
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> > 
> > Missing tags:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Hi Rob:
> Oops, I'm really sorry about that I missing this reviewed-by tag in v5 by
>  my mistake.
> Thank you very much for your notice and kindly help.
> 
> Hi Shawn:
> Can you help to pick-up Rob's reviewed-by tag?
> Thanks in advanced.

Hmm, this one should go via PCI tree.

Shawn
Richard Zhu Sept. 2, 2024, 2:08 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Shawn:
Thanks for your help.

Hi Krzysztof:
Can you help to pick up the #1 patch?
Thanks in advanced.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@yeah.net>
> Sent: 2024年8月31日 21:00
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>; shawnguo@kernel.org;
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de;
> l.stach@pengutronix.de; krzk+dt@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and
> "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint
> 
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:49:30AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions.
> > > However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
> > > The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they
> apply.
> > >
> > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> > >
> > > Missing tags:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > Hi Rob:
> > Oops, I'm really sorry about that I missing this reviewed-by tag in v5
> > by  my mistake.
> > Thank you very much for your notice and kindly help.
> >
> > Hi Shawn:
> > Can you help to pick-up Rob's reviewed-by tag?
> > Thanks in advanced.
> 
> Hmm, this one should go via PCI tree.
> 
> Shawn
Frank Li Sept. 4, 2024, 1:38 p.m. UTC | #6
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:08:05AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> Hi Shawn:
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Hi Krzysztof:
> Can you help to pick up the #1 patch?
> Thanks in advanced.

Add Bjorn Helgaas, I am not sure why origial To/Cc list have not bjorn.

Bjorn:
	Could you please take care this patch, which already acked by Rob?
	We don't want to missed this merge windows for this trivial binding
change.

Frank

>
> Best Regards
> Richard Zhu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@yeah.net>
> > Sent: 2024年8月31日 21:00
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>; shawnguo@kernel.org;
> > linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> > imx@lists.linux.dev; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de;
> > l.stach@pengutronix.de; krzk+dt@kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and
> > "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 01:49:30AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions.
> > > > However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
> > > > The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they
> > apply.
> > > >
> > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> > > >
> > > > Missing tags:
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Hi Rob:
> > > Oops, I'm really sorry about that I missing this reviewed-by tag in v5
> > > by  my mistake.
> > > Thank you very much for your notice and kindly help.
> > >
> > > Hi Shawn:
> > > Can you help to pick-up Rob's reviewed-by tag?
> > > Thanks in advanced.
> >
> > Hmm, this one should go via PCI tree.
> >
> > Shawn
>
Krzysztof Wilczyński Sept. 6, 2024, 6:31 a.m. UTC | #7
Hello,

> Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> 
> For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> driver. This method is not good.
> 
> In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit is
> preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> 
> These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according base
> addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are provided, i.MX
> PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.

Applied to dt-bindings, thank you!

[1/1] dt-bindings: PCI: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint
      https://git.kernel.org/pci/pci/c/2f309c988b7c

	Krzysztof
Niklas Cassel Oct. 9, 2024, 3 p.m. UTC | #8
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:42:20PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> 
> For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> driver. This method is not good.
> 
> In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit is
> preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> 
> These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according base
> addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are provided, i.MX
> PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml  | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> index a06f75df8458..84ca12e8b25b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ allOf:
>      then:
>        properties:
>          reg:
> -          minItems: 2
> -          maxItems: 2
> +          minItems: 4
> +          maxItems: 4

Now it seems like this patch has already been picked up,
but how is this not breaking DT backwards compatibility?

You are here increasing minItems, which means that an older DT
should now fail to validate using the new schema?

I thought that it was only acceptable to add new optional properties
after the DT binding has been accepted.

What am I missing?


If the specific compatible isn't used by any DTS in a released kernel,
then I think that the commit log should have clearly stated so,
and explained that that is the reason why it is okay to break DT backwards
compatibility.


Kind regards,
Niklas

>          reg-names:
>            items:
>              - const: dbi
>              - const: addr_space
> +            - const: dbi2
> +            - const: atu
>  
>    - if:
>        properties:
> @@ -129,8 +131,11 @@ examples:
>  
>      pcie_ep: pcie-ep@33800000 {
>        compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-pcie-ep";
> -      reg = <0x33800000 0x000400000>, <0x18000000 0x08000000>;
> -      reg-names = "dbi", "addr_space";
> +      reg = <0x33800000 0x100000>,
> +            <0x18000000 0x8000000>,
> +            <0x33900000 0x100000>,
> +            <0x33b00000 0x100000>;
> +      reg-names = "dbi", "addr_space", "dbi2", "atu";
>        clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_HSIO_ROOT>,
>                 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_HSIO_AXI>,
>                 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_PCIE_ROOT>;
> -- 
> 2.37.1
>
Richard Zhu Oct. 10, 2024, 2:17 a.m. UTC | #9
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> Sent: 2024年10月9日 23:00
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> Cc: robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> shawnguo@kernel.org; l.stach@pengutronix.de; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; imx@lists.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and
> "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint
> 
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:42:20PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> >
> > For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> > driver. This method is not good.
> >
> > In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> > Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit
> > is preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> >
> > These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> > properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according
> > base addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are
> > provided, i.MX PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml  | 13
> > +++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > index a06f75df8458..84ca12e8b25b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ allOf:
> >      then:
> >        properties:
> >          reg:
> > -          minItems: 2
> > -          maxItems: 2
> > +          minItems: 4
> > +          maxItems: 4
> 
> Now it seems like this patch has already been picked up, but how is this not
> breaking DT backwards compatibility?
> 
> You are here increasing minItems, which means that an older DT should now fail
> to validate using the new schema?
> 
> I thought that it was only acceptable to add new optional properties after the
> DT binding has been accepted.
> 
> What am I missing?
> 
> 
> If the specific compatible isn't used by any DTS in a released kernel, then I think
> that the commit log should have clearly stated so, and explained that that is the
> reason why it is okay to break DT backwards compatibility.
> 
Hi Niklas:
Thanks for your comments and concerns.
Up to now, the pcie_ep of i.MX8MP is only present in i.mx8mp.dtsi file.
And it isn't used by any DTS in the release kernels.
So, this series wouldn't break DT backwards compatibility.

Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> 
> Kind regards,
> Niklas
> 
> >          reg-names:
> >            items:
> >              - const: dbi
> >              - const: addr_space
> > +            - const: dbi2
> > +            - const: atu
> >
> >    - if:
> >        properties:
> > @@ -129,8 +131,11 @@ examples:
> >
> >      pcie_ep: pcie-ep@33800000 {
> >        compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-pcie-ep";
> > -      reg = <0x33800000 0x000400000>, <0x18000000 0x08000000>;
> > -      reg-names = "dbi", "addr_space";
> > +      reg = <0x33800000 0x100000>,
> > +            <0x18000000 0x8000000>,
> > +            <0x33900000 0x100000>,
> > +            <0x33b00000 0x100000>;
> > +      reg-names = "dbi", "addr_space", "dbi2", "atu";
> >        clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_HSIO_ROOT>,
> >                 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_HSIO_AXI>,
> >                 <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_PCIE_ROOT>;
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
Niklas Cassel Oct. 10, 2024, 9:33 a.m. UTC | #10
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 02:17:25AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > Sent: 2024年10月9日 23:00
> > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > Cc: robh@kernel.org; krzk+dt@kernel.org; conor+dt@kernel.org;
> > shawnguo@kernel.org; l.stach@pengutronix.de; devicetree@vger.kernel.org;
> > linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kernel@pengutronix.de; imx@lists.linux.dev
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: imx6q-pcie: Add reg-name "dbi2" and
> > "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 03:42:20PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > Add reg-name: "dbi2", "atu" for i.MX8M PCIe Endpoint.
> > >
> > > For i.MX8M PCIe EP, the dbi2 and atu addresses are pre-defined in the
> > > driver. This method is not good.
> > >
> > > In commit b7d67c6130ee ("PCI: imx6: Add iMX95 Endpoint (EP) support"),
> > > Frank suggests to fetch the dbi2 and atu from DT directly. This commit
> > > is preparation to do that for i.MX8M PCIe EP.
> > >
> > > These changes wouldn't break driver function. When "dbi2" and "atu"
> > > properties are present, i.MX PCIe driver would fetch the according
> > > base addresses from DT directly. If only two reg properties are
> > > provided, i.MX PCIe driver would fall back to the old method.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml  | 13
> > > +++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > index a06f75df8458..84ca12e8b25b 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
> > > @@ -65,12 +65,14 @@ allOf:
> > >      then:
> > >        properties:
> > >          reg:
> > > -          minItems: 2
> > > -          maxItems: 2
> > > +          minItems: 4
> > > +          maxItems: 4
> > 
> > Now it seems like this patch has already been picked up, but how is this not
> > breaking DT backwards compatibility?
> > 
> > You are here increasing minItems, which means that an older DT should now fail
> > to validate using the new schema?
> > 
> > I thought that it was only acceptable to add new optional properties after the
> > DT binding has been accepted.
> > 
> > What am I missing?
> > 
> > 
> > If the specific compatible isn't used by any DTS in a released kernel, then I think
> > that the commit log should have clearly stated so, and explained that that is the
> > reason why it is okay to break DT backwards compatibility.
> > 
> Hi Niklas:
> Thanks for your comments and concerns.
> Up to now, the pcie_ep of i.MX8MP is only present in i.mx8mp.dtsi file.
> And it isn't used by any DTS in the release kernels.
> So, this series wouldn't break DT backwards compatibility.

Ok, this information should have been in the commit message IMO.
(Too late now, but for the next patch affecting i.mx8mp.dtsi)

In the normal case, someone reviewing a DT binding patch will of course
assume there thre is actually a DTS using the binding, thus in the
(non-normal) case where there is no DTS using the binding, I think that
you should explicitly mention that in the commit message.


Kind regards,
Niklas
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
index a06f75df8458..84ca12e8b25b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/fsl,imx6q-pcie-ep.yaml
@@ -65,12 +65,14 @@  allOf:
     then:
       properties:
         reg:
-          minItems: 2
-          maxItems: 2
+          minItems: 4
+          maxItems: 4
         reg-names:
           items:
             - const: dbi
             - const: addr_space
+            - const: dbi2
+            - const: atu
 
   - if:
       properties:
@@ -129,8 +131,11 @@  examples:
 
     pcie_ep: pcie-ep@33800000 {
       compatible = "fsl,imx8mp-pcie-ep";
-      reg = <0x33800000 0x000400000>, <0x18000000 0x08000000>;
-      reg-names = "dbi", "addr_space";
+      reg = <0x33800000 0x100000>,
+            <0x18000000 0x8000000>,
+            <0x33900000 0x100000>,
+            <0x33b00000 0x100000>;
+      reg-names = "dbi", "addr_space", "dbi2", "atu";
       clocks = <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_HSIO_ROOT>,
                <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_HSIO_AXI>,
                <&clk IMX8MP_CLK_PCIE_ROOT>;