Message ID | 20241011064810.5103-1-macpaul.lin@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek: tphy: add a property for power-domains | expand |
On 11/10/2024 08:48, Macpaul Lin wrote: > MediaTek TPHY should be existed in a power-domains. should be part of power domain, hm? > So we add property 'power-domains' and set 'maxItems: 1' in the > DT Schema. Entire commit msg would benefit from Google Doc/office or ChatGpt/AI grammar correction. Many of us, including myself, are not native speakers so use tools when needed for that. > > A reminder is also added to the description of 'power-domains' > property. Use imperative. See longer explanation here: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L95 Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml index 423b7c4e62f2..6be3aa4557e5 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,tphy.yaml @@ -125,6 +125,16 @@ properties: $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 default: 28 + power-domains: + description: + The TPHY of MediaTek should exist within a power domain. The + developer should be aware that the hardware design of MediaTek TPHY + does not require the addition of MTCMOS. If the power to the TPHY + is turned off, it will impact other functions. From the current + perspective of USB hardware design, even if MTCMOS is added to the + TPHY, it should remain always on. + maxItems: 1 + # Required child node: patternProperties: "^(usb|pcie|sata)-phy@[0-9a-f]+$":