| Message ID | 20241017133909.3837547-2-kevin.brodsky@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Improve arm64 pkeys handling in signal delivery | expand |
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal > frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has > apparently never been used. Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does? Same throughout the series. (Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying... and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.) > Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> Weird. Maybe there are places where this could have been used, but I guess we have managed fine without it. Or possibly some unmerged version of the SVE patches used this but it disappeared in refactoring. Either way: Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c > index 561986947530..dc998326e24d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c > @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ struct rt_sigframe_user_layout { > unsigned long end_offset; > }; > > -#define BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) > #define TERMINATOR_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct _aarch64_ctx), 16) > #define EXTRA_CONTEXT_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct extra_context), 16) > > -- > 2.43.0 > >
On 17/10/2024 17:49, Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote: >> Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal >> frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has >> apparently never been used. > Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does? > > Same throughout the series. > > (Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's > part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying... > and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take > the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.) Ah good point, I didn't consider that. Will make it explicit in patch 1 and 2. Kevin
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal > frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has > apparently never been used. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > On 17/10/2024 17:49, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:39:05PM +0100, Kevin Brodsky wrote: > >> Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal > >> frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has > >> apparently never been used. > > Nit: Should there be a statement of what the patch does? > > > > Same throughout the series. > > > > (Yes, I know it's in the subject line, but Mutt doesn't think that's > > part of the message body, so I can't see it now that I'm replying... > > and submitting-patches.rst and e.g., maintainer-tip.rst seem to take > > the same policy, albeit without quite stating it explicitly.) > > Ah good point, I didn't consider that. Will make it explicit in patch 1 > and 2. Thanks. (I have a patch for submitting-patches.rst knocking about to propose making this more explicit, but I didn't dare to post it so far...) Cheers ---Dave
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c index 561986947530..dc998326e24d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ struct rt_sigframe_user_layout { unsigned long end_offset; }; -#define BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) #define TERMINATOR_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct _aarch64_ctx), 16) #define EXTRA_CONTEXT_SIZE round_up(sizeof(struct extra_context), 16)
Commit 33f082614c34 ("arm64: signal: Allow expansion of the signal frame") introduced the BASE_SIGFRAME_SIZE macro but it has apparently never been used. Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)