| Message ID | 1728368130-37213-6-git-send-email-shawn.lin@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Handled Elsewhere, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Initial support for RK3576 UFS controller | expand |
[...] > + > +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by genpd provider drivers. > + > + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > + > + /* > + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when level is less than 5? What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > + * which has the final decision. > + */ > + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > + else > + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and especially not from a genpd consumer driver. I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > + > + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > +} > + > +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + int err; > + > + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > + return err; > + } > + > + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > + usleep_range(1, 2); > + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > + > + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > +} > + > +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + > + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually happening? > + > + return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); > +} > + > +static const struct dev_pm_ops ufs_rockchip_pm_ops = { > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_system_suspend, ufshcd_system_resume) > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend, ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume, NULL) > + .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare, > + .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete, > +}; > + > +static struct platform_driver ufs_rockchip_pltform = { > + .probe = ufs_rockchip_probe, > + .remove = ufs_rockchip_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "ufshcd-rockchip", > + .pm = &ufs_rockchip_pm_ops, > + .of_match_table = ufs_rockchip_of_match, > + }, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(ufs_rockchip_pltform); > + [...] Kind regards Uffe
Hi Shawn, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on jejb-scsi/for-next] [also build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.12-rc2 next-20241009] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Shawn-Lin/scsi-ufs-core-Add-UFSHCI_QUIRK_DME_RESET_ENABLE_AFTER_HCE/20241009-042350 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1728368130-37213-6-git-send-email-shawn.lin%40rock-chips.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] scsi: ufs: rockchip: initial support for UFS config: csky-randconfig-r073-20241010 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241010/202410100321.D89hHCPV-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: csky-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241010/202410100321.D89hHCPV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410100321.D89hHCPV-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c: In function 'ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend': >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c:293:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'ufshcd_runtime_suspend'; did you mean 'pm_runtime_suspend'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 293 | return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pm_runtime_suspend drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c: In function 'ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume': >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c:312:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'ufshcd_runtime_resume'; did you mean 'pm_runtime_resume'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 312 | return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pm_runtime_resume drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c: In function 'ufs_rockchip_system_suspend': >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c:324:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'ufshcd_system_suspend'; did you mean 'ufs_rockchip_system_suspend'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 324 | return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ufs_rockchip_system_suspend drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c: At top level: >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c:315:12: warning: 'ufs_rockchip_system_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 315 | static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c:296:12: warning: 'ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 296 | static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c:275:12: warning: 'ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 275 | static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +293 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c 274 > 275 static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) 276 { 277 struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); 278 struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); 279 struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); 280 281 clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); 282 283 /* 284 * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. 285 * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver 286 * which has the final decision. 287 */ 288 if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) 289 genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; 290 else 291 genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; 292 > 293 return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); 294 } 295 > 296 static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) 297 { 298 struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); 299 struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); 300 int err; 301 302 err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); 303 if (err) { 304 dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); 305 return err; 306 } 307 308 reset_control_assert(host->rst); 309 usleep_range(1, 2); 310 reset_control_deassert(host->rst); 311 > 312 return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); 313 } 314 > 315 static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) 316 { 317 struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); 318 struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); 319 320 /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ 321 arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, 322 host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); 323 > 324 return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); 325 } 326
Hi Ulf 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > [...] > >> + >> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > > pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > genpd provider drivers. > >> + >> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); >> + >> + /* >> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > > Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > level is less than 5? > Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, then it will restore the registers and link. And the level is changeable via sysfs. > What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > >> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver >> + * which has the final decision. >> + */ >> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) >> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >> + else >> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > > The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > > I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right way. >> + >> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); >> +} >> + >> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >> + int err; >> + >> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); >> + if (err) { >> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); >> + usleep_range(1, 2); >> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); >> + >> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); >> +} >> + >> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >> + >> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ >> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, >> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > > Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > happening? > This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS conntroller. Per your comment at patch 4, should I use GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON + arm_smccc_smc here in system suspend? >> + >> + return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); >> +} >> + >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ufs_rockchip_pm_ops = { >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_system_suspend, ufshcd_system_resume) >> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend, ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume, NULL) >> + .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare, >> + .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct platform_driver ufs_rockchip_pltform = { >> + .probe = ufs_rockchip_probe, >> + .remove = ufs_rockchip_remove, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "ufshcd-rockchip", >> + .pm = &ufs_rockchip_pm_ops, >> + .of_match_table = ufs_rockchip_of_match, >> + }, >> +}; >> +module_platform_driver(ufs_rockchip_pltform); >> + > > [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe
On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > Hi Ulf > > 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > [...] > > > >> + > >> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >> +{ > >> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > > > > pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > > genpd provider drivers. > > > >> + > >> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > > > > Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > > level is less than 5? > > > > Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on > if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to > recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the > level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, > then it will restore the registers and link. > > And the level is changeable via sysfs. Okay, thanks for clarifying. > > > What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > > > >> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > >> + * which has the final decision. > >> + */ > >> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > >> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >> + else > >> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > > > > The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > > especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > > > > I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > > if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > > > > I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with > another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right > way. I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose something for you. > > >> + > >> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > >> +{ > >> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >> + int err; > >> + > >> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > >> + if (err) { > >> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > >> + return err; > >> + } > >> + > >> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > >> + usleep_range(1, 2); > >> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > >> + > >> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > >> +{ > >> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >> + > >> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > >> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > >> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > > > > Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > > power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > > happening? > > > > This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian > that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS > conntroller. Okay, thanks for clarifying! A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some point? > > Per your comment at patch 4, should I use GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON + > arm_smccc_smc here in system suspend? > > >> + > >> + return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ufs_rockchip_pm_ops = { > >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_system_suspend, ufshcd_system_resume) > >> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend, ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume, NULL) > >> + .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare, > >> + .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static struct platform_driver ufs_rockchip_pltform = { > >> + .probe = ufs_rockchip_probe, > >> + .remove = ufs_rockchip_remove, > >> + .driver = { > >> + .name = "ufshcd-rockchip", > >> + .pm = &ufs_rockchip_pm_ops, > >> + .of_match_table = ufs_rockchip_of_match, > >> + }, > >> +}; > >> +module_platform_driver(ufs_rockchip_pltform); > >> + > > > > [...] Kind regards Uffe
Hi Ulf, 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Ulf >> >> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>> [...] >>> >>>> + >>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); >>> >>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by >>> genpd provider drivers. >>> >>>> + >>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); >>>> + >>>> + /* >>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. >>> >>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when >>> level is less than 5? >>> >> >> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on >> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to >> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the >> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, >> then it will restore the registers and link. >> >> And the level is changeable via sysfs. > > Okay, thanks for clarifying. > >> >>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? >>> >>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver >>>> + * which has the final decision. >>>> + */ >>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) >>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>> + else >>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>> >>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and >>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. >>> >>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see >>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. >>> >> >> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with >> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right >> way. > > I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand > to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose > something for you. > Much appreciate. >> >>>> + >>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>> + int err; >>>> + >>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); >>>> + if (err) { >>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); >>>> + return err; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); >>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); >>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); >>>> + >>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>> + >>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ >>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, >>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); >>> >>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the >>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually >>> happening? >>> >> >> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian >> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS >> conntroller. > > Okay, thanks for clarifying! > > A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call > to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some > point? > Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or keep power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means off and 1 means on. >> >> Per your comment at patch 4, should I use GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON + >> arm_smccc_smc here in system suspend? >> >>>> + >>>> + return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops ufs_rockchip_pm_ops = { >>>> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_system_suspend, ufshcd_system_resume) >>>> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend, ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume, NULL) >>>> + .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare, >>>> + .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static struct platform_driver ufs_rockchip_pltform = { >>>> + .probe = ufs_rockchip_probe, >>>> + .remove = ufs_rockchip_remove, >>>> + .driver = { >>>> + .name = "ufshcd-rockchip", >>>> + .pm = &ufs_rockchip_pm_ops, >>>> + .of_match_table = ufs_rockchip_of_match, >>>> + }, >>>> +}; >>>> +module_platform_driver(ufs_rockchip_pltform); >>>> + >>> >>> [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe >
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 11:20, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > Hi Ulf, > > 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ulf > >> > >> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > >>> [...] > >>> > >>>> + > >>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > >>> > >>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > >>> genpd provider drivers. > >>> > >>>> + > >>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > >>> > >>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > >>> level is less than 5? > >>> > >> > >> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on > >> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to > >> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the > >> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, > >> then it will restore the registers and link. > >> > >> And the level is changeable via sysfs. > > > > Okay, thanks for clarifying. > > > >> > >>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > >>> > >>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > >>>> + * which has the final decision. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > >>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >>>> + else > >>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >>> > >>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > >>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > >>> > >>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > >>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > >>> > >> > >> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with > >> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right > >> way. > > > > I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand > > to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose > > something for you. > > > > Much appreciate. > > >> > >>>> + > >>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>> + int err; > >>>> + > >>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > >>>> + if (err) { > >>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > >>>> + return err; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > >>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); > >>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > >>>> + > >>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > >>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > >>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > >>> > >>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > >>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > >>> happening? > >>> > >> > >> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian > >> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS > >> conntroller. > > > > Okay, thanks for clarifying! > > > > A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call > > to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some > > point? > > > > Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or > keep power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means > off and 1 means on. I see. So you need to make the call each time when entering the system suspend? Or would it be okay to just make it once, when the spm_lvl is changed? Another way to deal with it, would be to make the smc call each time the power-domain is turned-on, based on spm_lvl too of course. Would that work? [...] Kind regards Uffe
在 2024/10/18 18:03, Ulf Hansson 写道: > On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 11:20, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Ulf, >> >> 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ulf >>>> >>>> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); >>>>> >>>>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by >>>>> genpd provider drivers. >>>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. >>>>> >>>>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when >>>>> level is less than 5? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on >>>> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to >>>> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the >>>> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, >>>> then it will restore the registers and link. >>>> >>>> And the level is changeable via sysfs. >>> >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying. >>> >>>> >>>>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? >>>>> >>>>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver >>>>>> + * which has the final decision. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) >>>>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>>>> + else >>>>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>>> >>>>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and >>>>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see >>>>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with >>>> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right >>>> way. >>> >>> I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand >>> to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose >>> something for you. >>> >> >> Much appreciate. >> >>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>> + int err; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); >>>>>> + if (err) { >>>>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); >>>>>> + return err; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); >>>>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); >>>>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ >>>>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, >>>>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); >>>>> >>>>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the >>>>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually >>>>> happening? >>>>> >>>> >>>> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian >>>> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS >>>> conntroller. >>> >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying! >>> >>> A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call >>> to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some >>> point? >>> >> >> Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or >> keep power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means >> off and 1 means on. > > I see. So you need to make the call each time when entering the system suspend? > > Or would it be okay to just make it once, when the spm_lvl is changed? Thers is no nofity when changing spm_lvl. > > Another way to deal with it, would be to make the smc call each time > the power-domain is turned-on, based on spm_lvl too of course. > > Would that work? Yes, that works. Another option is to cache power-domain states and check spm_lvl locally. If it doesn't change, we skip smc call. > > [...] > > Kind regards > Uffe >
On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 02:43, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > 在 2024/10/18 18:03, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 11:20, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ulf, > >> > >> 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: > >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ulf > >>>> > >>>> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > >>>>> [...] > >>>>> > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > >>>>> > >>>>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > >>>>> genpd provider drivers. > >>>>> > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + /* > >>>>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > >>>>> level is less than 5? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on > >>>> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to > >>>> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the > >>>> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, > >>>> then it will restore the registers and link. > >>>> > >>>> And the level is changeable via sysfs. > >>> > >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > >>>>> > >>>>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > >>>>>> + * which has the final decision. > >>>>>> + */ > >>>>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > >>>>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >>>>>> + else > >>>>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >>>>> > >>>>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > >>>>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > >>>>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with > >>>> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right > >>>> way. > >>> > >>> I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand > >>> to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose > >>> something for you. > >>> > >> > >> Much appreciate. > >> > >>>> > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > >>>>>> +} > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>>>> + int err; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > >>>>>> + if (err) { > >>>>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > >>>>>> + return err; > >>>>>> + } > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > >>>>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); > >>>>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > >>>>>> +} > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > >>>>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > >>>>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > >>>>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > >>>>> happening? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian > >>>> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS > >>>> conntroller. > >>> > >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying! > >>> > >>> A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call > >>> to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some > >>> point? > >>> > >> > >> Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or > >> keep power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means > >> off and 1 means on. > > > > I see. So you need to make the call each time when entering the system suspend? > > > > Or would it be okay to just make it once, when the spm_lvl is changed? > > Thers is no nofity when changing spm_lvl. > > > > > Another way to deal with it, would be to make the smc call each time > > the power-domain is turned-on, based on spm_lvl too of course. > > > > Would that work? > > Yes, that works. Another option is to cache power-domain states and > check spm_lvl locally. If it doesn't change, we skip smc call. Apologize for the delay! I needed to think a bit more carefully about how to suggest moving this forward. My conclusion is that we need to extend the PM domain infrastructure (genpd in particular), to allow drivers to dynamically inform whether it's okay to turn on/off the PM domain in runtime. There is a similar thing already available, which is to use dev PM qos along with the genpd governor, but that would not work in this case because it may prevent runtime suspend for the device in question too. I have therefore cooked a patch for genpd, see below. I think you can fold it into your next version of the series. See also additional suggestions below the patch. From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:55:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] pmdomain: core: Introduce dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on() For some usecases a consumer driver requires its device to remain power-on from the PM domain perspective during runtime. Using dev PM qos along with the genpd governors, doesn't work for this case as would potentially prevent the device from being runtime suspended too. To support these usecases, let's introduce dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on() to allow consumers drivers to dynamically control the behaviour in genpd for a device that is attached to it. Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> --- drivers/pmdomain/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pm_domain.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/core.c b/drivers/pmdomain/core.c index a6c8b85dd024..e86e270b7eb9 100644 --- a/drivers/pmdomain/core.c +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/core.c @@ -697,6 +697,36 @@ bool dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode(struct device *dev) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode); +/** + * dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on() - Control if the PM domain can be powered off. + * + * @dev: Device for which the PM domain may need to stay on for. + * @on: Value to set or unset for the condition. + * + * For some usecases a consumer driver requires its device to remain power-on + * from the PM domain perspective during runtime. This function allows the + * behaviour to be dynamically controlled for a device attached to a genpd. + * + * It is assumed that the users guarantee that the genpd wouldn't be detached + * while this routine is getting called. + * + * Return: Returns 0 on success and negative error values on failures. + */ +int dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on(struct device *dev, bool on) +{ + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd; + + genpd = dev_to_genpd_safe(dev); + if (!genpd) + return -ENODEV; + + genpd_lock(genpd); + dev_gpd_data(dev)->rpm_always_on = on; + genpd_unlock(genpd); + + return 0; +} + static int _genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed) { unsigned int state_idx = genpd->state_idx; @@ -868,6 +898,10 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool one_dev_on, if (!pm_runtime_suspended(pdd->dev) || irq_safe_dev_in_sleep_domain(pdd->dev, genpd)) not_suspended++; + + /* The device may need its PM domain to stay powered on. */ + if (to_gpd_data(pdd)->rpm_always_on) + return -EBUSY; } if (not_suspended > 1 || (not_suspended == 1 && !one_dev_on)) diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h index 45646bfcaf1a..d4c4a7cf34bd 100644 --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ struct generic_pm_domain_data { unsigned int rpm_pstate; unsigned int opp_token; bool hw_mode; + bool rpm_always_on; void *data; }; @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ ktime_t dev_pm_genpd_get_next_hrtimer(struct device *dev); void dev_pm_genpd_synced_poweroff(struct device *dev); int dev_pm_genpd_set_hwmode(struct device *dev, bool enable); bool dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode(struct device *dev); +int dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on(struct device *dev, bool on); extern struct dev_power_governor simple_qos_governor; extern struct dev_power_governor pm_domain_always_on_gov; @@ -375,6 +377,11 @@ static inline bool dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode(struct device *dev) return false; } +static inline int dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on(struct device *dev, bool on) +{ + return -EOPNOTSUPP; +} + #define simple_qos_governor (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL)) #define pm_domain_always_on_gov (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL)) #endif
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 05:20:08PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ulf > > > > > > 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > > > > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > > > > + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > > > > > > > > pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > > > > genpd provider drivers. > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > > > > > + > > > > > + /* > > > > > + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > > > > > > > > Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > > > > level is less than 5? > > > > > > > > > > Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on > > > if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to > > > recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the > > > level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, > > > then it will restore the registers and link. > > > > > > And the level is changeable via sysfs. > > > > Okay, thanks for clarifying. > > > > > > > > > What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > > > > > > > > > + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > > > > > + * which has the final decision. > > > > > + */ > > > > > + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > > > > > + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > > > > > + else > > > > > + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > > > > > > > > The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > > > > especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > > > > > > > > I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > > > > if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > > > > > > > > > > I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with > > > another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right > > > way. > > > > I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand > > to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose > > something for you. > > > > Much appreciate. > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > > > > > +} > > > > > + > > > > > +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > > > > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > > > > + int err; > > > > > + > > > > > + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > > > > > + if (err) { > > > > > + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > > > > > + return err; > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > > > > > + usleep_range(1, 2); > > > > > + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > > > > > + > > > > > + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > > > > > +} > > > > > + > > > > > +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > > > > > +{ > > > > > + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > > > > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > > > > + > > > > > + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > > > > > + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > > > > > + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > > > > > > > > Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > > > > power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > > > > happening? > > > > > > > > > > This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian > > > that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS > > > conntroller. > > > > Okay, thanks for clarifying! > > > > A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call > > to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some > > point? > > > > Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or keep > power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means > off and 1 means on. > We had a requirement to notify the genpd provider from consumer to not turn off the power domain during system suspend. So Ulf came up with an API for consumers, device_set_wakeup_path() setting the 'dev->power.wakeup_path' which will be honored by the genpd core. Will that work for you? PS: The API naming suggests that the device will be used in wakeup path, which may not be true here but the end result will be the same. - Mani
Le 08/10/2024 à 08:15, Shawn Lin a écrit : > RK3576 SoC contains a UFS controller, add initial support fot it. s/fot/for/ > The features are: > (1) support UFS 2.0 features > (2) High speed up to HS-G3 > (3) 2RX-2TX lanes > (4) auto H8 entry and exit > > Software limitation: > (1) HCE procedure: enbale controller->enbale intr->dme_reset->dme_enable s/enbale/enable/ x 2 > (2) disable unipro timeout values before power mode change > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> > No need for an extra empty line > --- ... > +static int ufs_rockchip_common_init(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + struct device *dev = hba->dev; > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host; > + int err; > + > + host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!host) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + /* system control register for hci */ > + host->ufs_sys_ctrl = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "hci_grf"); > + if (IS_ERR(host->ufs_sys_ctrl)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->ufs_sys_ctrl), > + "cannot ioremap for hci system control register\n"); > + > + /* system control register for mphy */ > + host->ufs_phy_ctrl = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mphy_grf"); > + if (IS_ERR(host->ufs_phy_ctrl)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->ufs_phy_ctrl), > + "cannot ioremap for mphy system control register\n"); > + > + /* mphy base register */ > + host->mphy_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mphy"); > + if (IS_ERR(host->mphy_base)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->mphy_base), > + "cannot ioremap for mphy base register\n"); > + > + host->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev); > + if (IS_ERR(host->rst)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->rst), > + "failed to get reset control\n"); > + > + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > + usleep_range(1, 2); > + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > + > + host->ref_out_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "ref_out"); > + if (IS_ERR(host->ref_out_clk)) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->ref_out_clk), > + "ref_out unavailable\n"); > + > + host->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > + if (IS_ERR(host->rst_gpio)) > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(host->rst_gpio), > + "invalid reset-gpios property in node\n"); > + > + host->clks[0].id = "core"; > + host->clks[1].id = "pclk"; > + host->clks[2].id = "pclk_mphy"; > + err = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, UFS_MAX_CLKS, host->clks); > + if (err) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to get clocks\n"); > + > + err = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(UFS_MAX_CLKS, host->clks); This has to be undone somewhere, likely at the end of ufs_rockchip_remove(). > + if (err) > + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to enable clocks\n"); > + > + host->hba = hba; > + > + ufshcd_set_variant(hba, host); > + > + return 0; > +} ... > +static const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops ufs_hba_rk3576_vops = { > + .name = "rk3576", > + .init = ufs_rockchip_rk3576_init, > + .device_reset = ufs_rockchip_device_reset, > + .hce_enable_notify = ufs_rockchip_hce_enable_notify, > + .phy_initialization = ufs_rockchip_rk3576_phy_init, > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id ufs_rockchip_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3576-ufshc", .data = &ufs_hba_rk3576_vops}, Missing space before ending } > + {}, No need for an extra , here. > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ufs_rockchip_of_match); ... > +static void ufs_rockchip_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct ufs_hba *hba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > + > + pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev); > + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev); > + ufshcd_remove(hba); > + ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba); > + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); No need for clk_disable_unprepare(), ref_out_clk comes from devm_clk_get_enabled(), so the framework will already call clk_disable_unprepare(). > +} ... CJ
在 2024/11/1 23:12, Ulf Hansson 写道: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 02:43, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> >> 在 2024/10/18 18:03, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>> On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 11:20, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ulf, >>>> >>>> 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>>>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ulf >>>>>> >>>>>> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by >>>>>>> genpd provider drivers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + /* >>>>>>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when >>>>>>> level is less than 5? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on >>>>>> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to >>>>>> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the >>>>>> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, >>>>>> then it will restore the registers and link. >>>>>> >>>>>> And the level is changeable via sysfs. >>>>> >>>>> Okay, thanks for clarifying. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver >>>>>>>> + * which has the final decision. >>>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) >>>>>>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>>>>>> + else >>>>>>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and >>>>>>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see >>>>>>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with >>>>>> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right >>>>>> way. >>>>> >>>>> I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand >>>>> to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose >>>>> something for you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Much appreciate. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); >>>>>>>> +} >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>>>> + int err; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); >>>>>>>> + if (err) { >>>>>>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); >>>>>>>> + return err; >>>>>>>> + } >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); >>>>>>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); >>>>>>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); >>>>>>>> +} >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ >>>>>>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, >>>>>>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the >>>>>>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually >>>>>>> happening? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian >>>>>> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS >>>>>> conntroller. >>>>> >>>>> Okay, thanks for clarifying! >>>>> >>>>> A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call >>>>> to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some >>>>> point? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or >>>> keep power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means >>>> off and 1 means on. >>> >>> I see. So you need to make the call each time when entering the system suspend? >>> >>> Or would it be okay to just make it once, when the spm_lvl is changed? >> >> Thers is no nofity when changing spm_lvl. >> >>> >>> Another way to deal with it, would be to make the smc call each time >>> the power-domain is turned-on, based on spm_lvl too of course. >>> >>> Would that work? >> >> Yes, that works. Another option is to cache power-domain states and >> check spm_lvl locally. If it doesn't change, we skip smc call. > > Apologize for the delay! I needed to think a bit more carefully about > how to suggest moving this forward. > > My conclusion is that we need to extend the PM domain infrastructure > (genpd in particular), to allow drivers to dynamically inform whether > it's okay to turn on/off the PM domain in runtime. > > There is a similar thing already available, which is to use dev PM qos > along with the genpd governor, but that would not work in this case > because it may prevent runtime suspend for the device in question too. > I have therefore cooked a patch for genpd, see below. I think you can > fold it into your next version of the series. See also additional > suggestions below the patch. Thanks, Ulf. I'll fold it into my v4 series and fix the code in UFS driver and genpd provider according to your suggestions. > > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:55:56 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] pmdomain: core: Introduce dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on() > > For some usecases a consumer driver requires its device to remain power-on > from the PM domain perspective during runtime. Using dev PM qos along with > the genpd governors, doesn't work for this case as would potentially > prevent the device from being runtime suspended too. > > To support these usecases, let's introduce dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on() to > allow consumers drivers to dynamically control the behaviour in genpd for a > device that is attached to it. > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/pmdomain/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/core.c b/drivers/pmdomain/core.c > index a6c8b85dd024..e86e270b7eb9 100644 > --- a/drivers/pmdomain/core.c > +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/core.c > @@ -697,6 +697,36 @@ bool dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode(struct device *dev) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode); > > +/** > + * dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on() - Control if the PM domain can be powered off. > + * > + * @dev: Device for which the PM domain may need to stay on for. > + * @on: Value to set or unset for the condition. > + * > + * For some usecases a consumer driver requires its device to remain power-on > + * from the PM domain perspective during runtime. This function allows the > + * behaviour to be dynamically controlled for a device attached to a genpd. > + * > + * It is assumed that the users guarantee that the genpd wouldn't be detached > + * while this routine is getting called. > + * > + * Return: Returns 0 on success and negative error values on failures. > + */ > +int dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on(struct device *dev, bool on) > +{ > + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd; > + > + genpd = dev_to_genpd_safe(dev); > + if (!genpd) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + genpd_lock(genpd); > + dev_gpd_data(dev)->rpm_always_on = on; > + genpd_unlock(genpd); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int _genpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool timed) > { > unsigned int state_idx = genpd->state_idx; > @@ -868,6 +898,10 @@ static int genpd_power_off(struct > generic_pm_domain *genpd, bool one_dev_on, > if (!pm_runtime_suspended(pdd->dev) || > irq_safe_dev_in_sleep_domain(pdd->dev, genpd)) > not_suspended++; > + > + /* The device may need its PM domain to stay powered on. */ > + if (to_gpd_data(pdd)->rpm_always_on) > + return -EBUSY; > } > > if (not_suspended > 1 || (not_suspended == 1 && !one_dev_on)) > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_domain.h b/include/linux/pm_domain.h > index 45646bfcaf1a..d4c4a7cf34bd 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pm_domain.h > +++ b/include/linux/pm_domain.h > @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ struct generic_pm_domain_data { > unsigned int rpm_pstate; > unsigned int opp_token; > bool hw_mode; > + bool rpm_always_on; > void *data; > }; > > @@ -292,6 +293,7 @@ ktime_t dev_pm_genpd_get_next_hrtimer(struct device *dev); > void dev_pm_genpd_synced_poweroff(struct device *dev); > int dev_pm_genpd_set_hwmode(struct device *dev, bool enable); > bool dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode(struct device *dev); > +int dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on(struct device *dev, bool on); > > extern struct dev_power_governor simple_qos_governor; > extern struct dev_power_governor pm_domain_always_on_gov; > @@ -375,6 +377,11 @@ static inline bool dev_pm_genpd_get_hwmode(struct > device *dev) > return false; > } > > +static inline int dev_pm_genpd_rpm_always_on(struct device *dev, bool on) > +{ > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > +} > + > #define simple_qos_governor (*(struct dev_power_governor *)(NULL)) > #define pm_domain_always_on_gov (*(struct > dev_power_governor *)(NULL)) > #endif
在 2024/11/3 20:02, Manivannan Sadhasivam 写道: > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 05:20:08PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Ulf >>>> >>>> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); >>>>> >>>>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by >>>>> genpd provider drivers. >>>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. >>>>> >>>>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when >>>>> level is less than 5? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on >>>> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to >>>> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the >>>> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, >>>> then it will restore the registers and link. >>>> >>>> And the level is changeable via sysfs. >>> >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying. >>> >>>> >>>>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? >>>>> >>>>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver >>>>>> + * which has the final decision. >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) >>>>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>>>> + else >>>>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; >>>>> >>>>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and >>>>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see >>>>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with >>>> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right >>>> way. >>> >>> I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand >>> to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose >>> something for you. >>> >> >> Much appreciate. >> >>>> >>>>>> + >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>> + int err; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); >>>>>> + if (err) { >>>>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); >>>>>> + return err; >>>>>> + } >>>>>> + >>>>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); >>>>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); >>>>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); >>>>>> +} >>>>>> + >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ >>>>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, >>>>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); >>>>> >>>>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the >>>>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually >>>>> happening? >>>>> >>>> >>>> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian >>>> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS >>>> conntroller. >>> >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying! >>> >>> A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call >>> to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some >>> point? >>> >> >> Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or keep >> power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means >> off and 1 means on. >> > > We had a requirement to notify the genpd provider from consumer to not turn off > the power domain during system suspend. So Ulf came up with an API for > consumers, device_set_wakeup_path() setting the 'dev->power.wakeup_path' which > will be honored by the genpd core. Will that work for you? Yes, that works. And we may need a symmetrical call, for instance, device_clr_wakeup_path() to allow genpd provider to turn off the power domain as well. > > PS: The API naming suggests that the device will be used in wakeup path, which > may not be true here but the end result will be the same. > > - Mani >
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 07:38, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > 在 2024/11/3 20:02, Manivannan Sadhasivam 写道: > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 05:20:08PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > >> Hi Ulf, > >> > >> 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: > >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Ulf > >>>> > >>>> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > >>>>> [...] > >>>>> > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > >>>>> > >>>>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > >>>>> genpd provider drivers. > >>>>> > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + /* > >>>>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > >>>>> level is less than 5? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on > >>>> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to > >>>> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the > >>>> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, > >>>> then it will restore the registers and link. > >>>> > >>>> And the level is changeable via sysfs. > >>> > >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > >>>>> > >>>>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > >>>>>> + * which has the final decision. > >>>>>> + */ > >>>>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > >>>>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >>>>>> + else > >>>>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > >>>>> > >>>>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > >>>>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > >>>>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with > >>>> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right > >>>> way. > >>> > >>> I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand > >>> to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose > >>> something for you. > >>> > >> > >> Much appreciate. > >> > >>>> > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > >>>>>> +} > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>>>> + int err; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > >>>>>> + if (err) { > >>>>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > >>>>>> + return err; > >>>>>> + } > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > >>>>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); > >>>>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > >>>>>> +} > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > >>>>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > >>>>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > >>>>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > >>>>> happening? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian > >>>> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS > >>>> conntroller. > >>> > >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying! > >>> > >>> A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call > >>> to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some > >>> point? > >>> > >> > >> Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or keep > >> power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means > >> off and 1 means on. > >> > > > > We had a requirement to notify the genpd provider from consumer to not turn off > > the power domain during system suspend. So Ulf came up with an API for > > consumers, device_set_wakeup_path() setting the 'dev->power.wakeup_path' which > > will be honored by the genpd core. Will that work for you? > > Yes, that works. And we may need a symmetrical call, for instance, > device_clr_wakeup_path() to allow genpd provider to turn off the power > domain as well. The PM core clears the flag in device_prepare(). The flag is typically supposed to be set from a ->suspend() callback, so there should be no need for an additional function that clears the flag, I think. [...] Kind regards Uffe
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:51:45AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 07:38, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > > > 在 2024/11/3 20:02, Manivannan Sadhasivam 写道: > > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 05:20:08PM +0800, Shawn Lin wrote: > > >> Hi Ulf, > > >> > > >> 在 2024/10/18 17:07, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > >>> On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 03:21, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi Ulf > > >>>> > > >>>> 在 2024/10/9 21:15, Ulf Hansson 写道: > > >>>>> [...] > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) > > >>>>>> +{ > > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > >>>>>> + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); > > >>>>> > > >>>>> pd_to_genpd() isn't safe to use like this. It's solely to be used by > > >>>>> genpd provider drivers. > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + /* > > >>>>>> + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Can you elaborate on why we must not power-off the power-domain when > > >>>>> level is less than 5? > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Because ufshcd driver assume the controller is active and the link is on > > >>>> if level is less than 5. So the default resume policy will not try to > > >>>> recover the registers until the first error happened. Otherwise if the > > >>>> level is >=5, it assumes the controller is off and the link is down, > > >>>> then it will restore the registers and link. > > >>>> > > >>>> And the level is changeable via sysfs. > > >>> > > >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying. > > >>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> What happens if we power-off anyway when the level is less than 5? > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver > > >>>>>> + * which has the final decision. > > >>>>>> + */ > > >>>>>> + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) > > >>>>>> + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > > >>>>>> + else > > >>>>>> + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The genpd->flags is not supposed to be changed like this - and > > >>>>> especially not from a genpd consumer driver. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I am trying to understand a bit more of the use case here. Let's see > > >>>>> if that helps me to potentially suggest an alternative approach. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I was not familiar with the genpd part, so I haven't come up with > > >>>> another solution. It would be great if you can guide me to the right > > >>>> way. > > >>> > > >>> I have been playing with the existing infrastructure we have at hand > > >>> to support this, but I need a few more days to be able to propose > > >>> something for you. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Much appreciate. > > >> > > >>>> > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); > > >>>>>> +} > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) > > >>>>>> +{ > > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > >>>>>> + int err; > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); > > >>>>>> + if (err) { > > >>>>>> + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); > > >>>>>> + return err; > > >>>>>> + } > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + reset_control_assert(host->rst); > > >>>>>> + usleep_range(1, 2); > > >>>>>> + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); > > >>>>>> +} > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) > > >>>>>> +{ > > >>>>>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > >>>>>> + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); > > >>>>>> + > > >>>>>> + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ > > >>>>>> + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, > > >>>>>> + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Can you please elaborate on what goes on here? Is this turning off the > > >>>>> power-domain that the dev is attached to - or what is actually > > >>>>> happening? > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> This smc call is trying to ask firmware not to turn off the power-domian > > >>>> that the UFS is attached to and also not to turn off the power of UFS > > >>>> conntroller. > > >>> > > >>> Okay, thanks for clarifying! > > >>> > > >>> A follow up question, don't you need to make a corresponding smc call > > >>> to inform the FW that it's okay to turn off the power-domain at some > > >>> point? > > >>> > > >> > > >> Yes. Each time entering sleep, we teach FW if it need to turn off or keep > > >> power-domain, for instance "hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0" , 0 means > > >> off and 1 means on. > > >> > > > > > > We had a requirement to notify the genpd provider from consumer to not turn off > > > the power domain during system suspend. So Ulf came up with an API for > > > consumers, device_set_wakeup_path() setting the 'dev->power.wakeup_path' which > > > will be honored by the genpd core. Will that work for you? > > > > Yes, that works. And we may need a symmetrical call, for instance, > > device_clr_wakeup_path() to allow genpd provider to turn off the power > > domain as well. > > The PM core clears the flag in device_prepare(). The flag is typically > supposed to be set from a ->suspend() callback, so there should be no > need for an additional function that clears the flag, I think. > Yeah, that's my understanding as well though I didn't look into PM core deeply. - Mani
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig b/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig index 580c8d0..191fbd7 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig @@ -142,3 +142,15 @@ config SCSI_UFS_SPRD Select this if you have UFS controller on Unisoc chipset. If unsure, say N. + +config SCSI_UFS_ROCKCHIP + tristate "Rockchip UFS host controller driver" + depends on SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM && (ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST) + help + This selects the Rockchip specific additions to UFSHCD platform driver. + UFS host on Rockchip needs some vendor specific configuration before + accessing the hardware which includes PHY configuration and vendor + specific registers. + + Select this if you have UFS controller on Rockchip chipset. + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile b/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile index 4573aea..2f97feb 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/Makefile @@ -10,5 +10,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM) += ufshcd-pltfrm.o obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_HISI) += ufs-hisi.o obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_MEDIATEK) += ufs-mediatek.o obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_RENESAS) += ufs-renesas.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_ROCKCHIP) += ufs-rockchip.o obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_SPRD) += ufs-sprd.o obj-$(CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_TI_J721E) += ti-j721e-ufs.o diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..98bd646 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Rockchip UFS Host Controller driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2024 Rockchip Electronics Co.Ltd. + */ + +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/gpio.h> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> +#include <soc/rockchip/rockchip_sip.h> + +#include <ufs/ufshcd.h> +#include <ufs/unipro.h> +#include "ufshcd-pltfrm.h" +#include "ufs-rockchip.h" + +static int ufs_rockchip_hce_enable_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba, + enum ufs_notify_change_status status) +{ + int err = 0; + + if (status == POST_CHANGE) + err = ufshcd_vops_phy_initialization(hba); + + return err; +} + +static void ufs_rockchip_set_pm_lvl(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + hba->rpm_lvl = UFS_PM_LVL_5; + hba->spm_lvl = UFS_PM_LVL_5; +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_rk3576_phy_init(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(PA_LOCAL_TX_LCC_ENABLE, 0x0), 0x0); + /* enable the mphy DME_SET cfg */ + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x200, 0x0), 0x40); + for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + /* Configuration M-TX */ + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0xaa, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0x06); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0xa9, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0x02); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0xad, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0x44); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0xac, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0xe6); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0xab, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0x07); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x94, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0x93); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x93, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0xc9); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x7f, SEL_TX_LANE0 + i), 0x00); + /* Configuration M-RX */ + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x12, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0x06); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x11, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0x00); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x1d, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0x58); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x1c, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0x8c); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x1b, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0x02); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x25, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0xf6); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x2f, SEL_RX_LANE0 + i), 0x69); + } + /* disable the mphy DME_SET cfg */ + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(0x200, 0x0), 0x00); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x80, 0x08C); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0xB5, 0x110); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0xB5, 0x250); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x134); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x274); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x38, 0x0E0); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x38, 0x220); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x50, 0x164); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x50, 0x2A4); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x80, 0x178); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x80, 0x2B8); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x18, 0x1B0); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x18, 0x2F0); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x128); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x268); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x20, 0x12C); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x20, 0x26C); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0xC0, 0x120); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0xC0, 0x260); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x094); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x1B4); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x03, 0x2F4); + + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0xC0, 0x08C); + usleep_range(1, 2); + ufs_sys_writel(host->mphy_base, 0x00, 0x08C); + + usleep_range(200, 250); + /* start link up */ + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(MIB_T_DBG_CPORT_TX_ENDIAN, 0), 0x0); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(MIB_T_DBG_CPORT_RX_ENDIAN, 0), 0x0); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(N_DEVICEID, 0), 0x0); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(N_DEVICEID_VALID, 0), 0x1); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(T_PEERDEVICEID, 0), 0x1); + ufshcd_dme_set(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(T_CONNECTIONSTATE, 0), 0x1); + + return 0; +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_common_init(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + struct device *dev = hba->dev; + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev); + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host; + int err; + + host = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!host) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* system control register for hci */ + host->ufs_sys_ctrl = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "hci_grf"); + if (IS_ERR(host->ufs_sys_ctrl)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->ufs_sys_ctrl), + "cannot ioremap for hci system control register\n"); + + /* system control register for mphy */ + host->ufs_phy_ctrl = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mphy_grf"); + if (IS_ERR(host->ufs_phy_ctrl)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->ufs_phy_ctrl), + "cannot ioremap for mphy system control register\n"); + + /* mphy base register */ + host->mphy_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mphy"); + if (IS_ERR(host->mphy_base)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->mphy_base), + "cannot ioremap for mphy base register\n"); + + host->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev); + if (IS_ERR(host->rst)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->rst), + "failed to get reset control\n"); + + reset_control_assert(host->rst); + usleep_range(1, 2); + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); + + host->ref_out_clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "ref_out"); + if (IS_ERR(host->ref_out_clk)) + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(host->ref_out_clk), + "ref_out unavailable\n"); + + host->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); + if (IS_ERR(host->rst_gpio)) + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(host->rst_gpio), + "invalid reset-gpios property in node\n"); + + host->clks[0].id = "core"; + host->clks[1].id = "pclk"; + host->clks[2].id = "pclk_mphy"; + err = devm_clk_bulk_get_optional(dev, UFS_MAX_CLKS, host->clks); + if (err) + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to get clocks\n"); + + err = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(UFS_MAX_CLKS, host->clks); + if (err) + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to enable clocks\n"); + + host->hba = hba; + + ufshcd_set_variant(hba, host); + + return 0; +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_rk3576_init(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + struct device *dev = hba->dev; + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + int ret; + + hba->quirks = UFSHCD_QUIRK_SKIP_DEF_UNIPRO_TIMEOUT_SETTING | + UFSHCI_QUIRK_DME_RESET_ENABLE_AFTER_HCE; + + /* Enable BKOPS when suspend */ + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_AUTO_BKOPS_SUSPEND; + /* Enable putting device into deep sleep */ + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_DEEPSLEEP; + /* Enable devfreq of UFS */ + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_CLK_SCALING; + /* Enable WriteBooster */ + hba->caps |= UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN; + + host->pd_id = RK3576_PD_UFS; + + ret = ufs_rockchip_common_init(hba); + if (ret) + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "ufs common init fail\n"); + + return 0; +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba) +{ + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + + /* Active the reset-gpios */ + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(host->rst_gpio, 1); + usleep_range(20, 25); + + /* Inactive the reset-gpios */ + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(host->rst_gpio, 0); + usleep_range(20, 25); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops ufs_hba_rk3576_vops = { + .name = "rk3576", + .init = ufs_rockchip_rk3576_init, + .device_reset = ufs_rockchip_device_reset, + .hce_enable_notify = ufs_rockchip_hce_enable_notify, + .phy_initialization = ufs_rockchip_rk3576_phy_init, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id ufs_rockchip_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3576-ufshc", .data = &ufs_hba_rk3576_vops}, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ufs_rockchip_of_match); + +static int ufs_rockchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops *vops; + struct ufs_hba *hba; + int err; + + vops = device_get_match_data(dev); + if (!vops) + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "ufs_hba_variant_ops not defined.\n"); + + err = ufshcd_pltfrm_init(pdev, vops); + if (err) + return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "ufshcd_pltfrm_init failed\n"); + + hba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + /* Set the default desired pm level in case no users set via sysfs */ + ufs_rockchip_set_pm_lvl(hba); + + return 0; +} + +static void ufs_rockchip_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct ufs_hba *hba = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + + pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev); + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev); + ufshcd_remove(hba); + ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba); + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) +{ + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(dev->pm_domain); + + clk_disable_unprepare(host->ref_out_clk); + + /* + * Shouldn't power down if rpm_lvl is less than level 5. + * This flag will be passed down to platform power-domain driver + * which has the final decision. + */ + if (hba->rpm_lvl < UFS_PM_LVL_5) + genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; + else + genpd->flags &= ~GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON; + + return ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev); +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) +{ + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + int err; + + err = clk_prepare_enable(host->ref_out_clk); + if (err) { + dev_err(hba->dev, "failed to enable ref out clock %d\n", err); + return err; + } + + reset_control_assert(host->rst); + usleep_range(1, 2); + reset_control_deassert(host->rst); + + return ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev); +} + +static int ufs_rockchip_system_suspend(struct device *dev) +{ + struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct ufs_rockchip_host *host = ufshcd_get_variant(hba); + + /* Pass down desired spm_lvl to Firmware */ + arm_smccc_smc(ROCKCHIP_SIP_SUSPEND_MODE, ROCKCHIP_SLEEP_PD_CONFIG, + host->pd_id, hba->spm_lvl < 5 ? 1 : 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL); + + return ufshcd_system_suspend(dev); +} + +static const struct dev_pm_ops ufs_rockchip_pm_ops = { + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_system_suspend, ufshcd_system_resume) + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ufs_rockchip_runtime_suspend, ufs_rockchip_runtime_resume, NULL) + .prepare = ufshcd_suspend_prepare, + .complete = ufshcd_resume_complete, +}; + +static struct platform_driver ufs_rockchip_pltform = { + .probe = ufs_rockchip_probe, + .remove = ufs_rockchip_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "ufshcd-rockchip", + .pm = &ufs_rockchip_pm_ops, + .of_match_table = ufs_rockchip_of_match, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(ufs_rockchip_pltform); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Rockchip UFS Host Driver"); diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.h b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..37c45a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.h @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ +/* + * Rockchip UFS Host Controller driver + * + * Copyright (C) 2024 Rockchip Electronics Co.Ltd. + */ + +#ifndef _UFS_ROCKCHIP_H_ +#define _UFS_ROCKCHIP_H_ + +#define UFS_MAX_CLKS 3 + +#define SEL_TX_LANE0 0x0 +#define SEL_TX_LANE1 0x1 +#define SEL_TX_LANE2 0x2 +#define SEL_TX_LANE3 0x3 +#define SEL_RX_LANE0 0x4 +#define SEL_RX_LANE1 0x5 +#define SEL_RX_LANE2 0x6 +#define SEL_RX_LANE3 0x7 + +#define MIB_T_DBG_CPORT_TX_ENDIAN 0xc022 +#define MIB_T_DBG_CPORT_RX_ENDIAN 0xc023 + +#define RK3576_PD_UFS 0x7 + +struct ufs_rockchip_host { + struct ufs_hba *hba; + void __iomem *ufs_phy_ctrl; + void __iomem *ufs_sys_ctrl; + void __iomem *mphy_base; + struct gpio_desc *rst_gpio; + struct reset_control *rst; + struct clk *ref_out_clk; + struct clk_bulk_data clks[UFS_MAX_CLKS]; + uint64_t caps; + uint64_t pd_id; +}; + +#define ufs_sys_writel(base, val, reg) \ + writel((val), (base) + (reg)) +#define ufs_sys_readl(base, reg) readl((base) + (reg)) +#define ufs_sys_set_bits(base, mask, reg) \ + ufs_sys_writel( \ + (base), ((mask) | (ufs_sys_readl((base), (reg)))), (reg)) +#define ufs_sys_ctrl_clr_bits(base, mask, reg) \ + ufs_sys_writel((base), \ + ((~(mask)) & (ufs_sys_readl((base), (reg)))), \ + (reg)) + +#endif /* _UFS_ROCKCHIP_H_ */
RK3576 SoC contains a UFS controller, add initial support fot it. The features are: (1) support UFS 2.0 features (2) High speed up to HS-G3 (3) 2RX-2TX lanes (4) auto H8 entry and exit Software limitation: (1) HCE procedure: enbale controller->enbale intr->dme_reset->dme_enable (2) disable unipro timeout values before power mode change Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> --- Changes in v3: - reword Kconfig description - elaborate more about controller in commit msg - use rockchip,rk3576-ufshc for compatible - remove useless header file - remove inline for ufshcd_is_device_present - use usleep_range instead - remove initialization, reverse Xmas order - remove useless varibles - check vops for null - other small fixes for err path - remove pm_runtime_set_active - fix the active and inactive reset-gpios logic - fix rpm_lvl and spm_lvl to 5 and move to end of probe path - remove unnecessary system PM callbacks - use UFSHCI_QUIRK_DME_RESET_ENABLE_AFTER_HCE instead of UFSHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_HCE Changes in v2: None drivers/ufs/host/Kconfig | 12 ++ drivers/ufs/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c | 346 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.h | 51 ++++++ 4 files changed, 410 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.c create mode 100644 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-rockchip.h