Message ID | 20241016123036.21366-6-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | x86/mce: Clean up some x86/mce code | expand |
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > index 4284749ec803..ffa28769dea6 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > @@ -120,20 +120,20 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void) > { > int mce_numrecords, mce_poolsz, order; > struct gen_pool *gpool; > - int ret = -ENOMEM; > void *mce_pool; > + int ret; > Nit: Maybe move the uninitialized ret along with the other ints in the first line? I had suggested something very similar but Boris felt that the current code as-is reads better. But that was in a slightly different context. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240307170901.GBZen0re6AvpscLaTM@fat_crate.local/ > order = order_base_2(sizeof(struct mce_evt_llist)); > gpool = gen_pool_create(order, -1); > if (!gpool) > - return ret; > + return -ENOMEM; > > mce_numrecords = max(MCE_MIN_ENTRIES, num_possible_cpus() * MCE_PER_CPU); > mce_poolsz = mce_numrecords * (1 << order); > mce_pool = kmalloc(mce_poolsz, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!mce_pool) { > gen_pool_destroy(gpool); > - return ret; > + return -ENOMEM; > } > ret = gen_pool_add(gpool, (unsigned long)mce_pool, mce_poolsz, -1); > if (ret) { > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void) > > mce_evt_pool = gpool; > > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > int mce_gen_pool_init(void)
> From: Mehta, Sohil <sohil.mehta@intel.com> > [...] > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > > index 4284749ec803..ffa28769dea6 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c > > @@ -120,20 +120,20 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void) { > > int mce_numrecords, mce_poolsz, order; > > struct gen_pool *gpool; > > - int ret = -ENOMEM; > > void *mce_pool; > > + int ret; > > > > Nit: Maybe move the uninitialized ret along with the other ints in the first > line? OK, that will save one line of code. I'll update this in the next version. > I had suggested something very similar but Boris felt that the current code as- > is reads better. But that was in a slightly different context. > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240307170901.GBZen0re6AvpscLaTM@fat_crat > e.local/ Thanks for sharing this ...
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c index 4284749ec803..ffa28769dea6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/genpool.c @@ -120,20 +120,20 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void) { int mce_numrecords, mce_poolsz, order; struct gen_pool *gpool; - int ret = -ENOMEM; void *mce_pool; + int ret; order = order_base_2(sizeof(struct mce_evt_llist)); gpool = gen_pool_create(order, -1); if (!gpool) - return ret; + return -ENOMEM; mce_numrecords = max(MCE_MIN_ENTRIES, num_possible_cpus() * MCE_PER_CPU); mce_poolsz = mce_numrecords * (1 << order); mce_pool = kmalloc(mce_poolsz, GFP_KERNEL); if (!mce_pool) { gen_pool_destroy(gpool); - return ret; + return -ENOMEM; } ret = gen_pool_add(gpool, (unsigned long)mce_pool, mce_poolsz, -1); if (ret) { @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int mce_gen_pool_create(void) mce_evt_pool = gpool; - return ret; + return 0; } int mce_gen_pool_init(void)