diff mbox series

btrfs: add a sanity check for csum root before fill the data csum

Message ID tencent_B5CA92105D925DA2993D4FD20DDD25BF8D07@qq.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series btrfs: add a sanity check for csum root before fill the data csum | expand

Commit Message

Edward Adam Davis Oct. 23, 2024, 11:04 a.m. UTC
Syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref in btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap.
The btrfs info contains IGNOREDATACSUMS, which prevents the csum root from
being loaded.
Before filling in the csum data, check the flag BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS
to confirm that the csum root has been loaded.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5d2b33d7835870519b5f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d2b33d7835870519b5f
Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Qu Wenruo Oct. 23, 2024, 9:07 p.m. UTC | #1
在 2024/10/23 21:34, Edward Adam Davis 写道:
> Syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref in btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap.
> The btrfs info contains IGNOREDATACSUMS, which prevents the csum root from
> being loaded.
> Before filling in the csum data, check the flag BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS
> to confirm that the csum root has been loaded.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5d2b33d7835870519b5f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d2b33d7835870519b5f
> Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>

Thanks,
Qu

> ---
>   fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index 3a3427428074..1ba4d8ba902b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1602,7 +1602,8 @@ static int scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
>   	}
>
>   	/* Now fill the data csum. */
> -	if (bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
> +	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS, &fs_info->fs_state) &&
> +	    bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
>   		int sector_nr;
>   		unsigned long csum_bitmap = 0;
>
David Sterba Oct. 25, 2024, 6:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 07:04:40PM +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
> Syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref in btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap.
> The btrfs info contains IGNOREDATACSUMS, which prevents the csum root from
> being loaded.
> Before filling in the csum data, check the flag BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS
> to confirm that the csum root has been loaded.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5d2b33d7835870519b5f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d2b33d7835870519b5f
> Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>

Added to for-next, thanks.

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> index 3a3427428074..1ba4d8ba902b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
> @@ -1602,7 +1602,8 @@ static int scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Now fill the data csum. */
> -	if (bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
> +	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS, &fs_info->fs_state) &&

I've updatd the coment as this is double negation that could be
confusing on a quick read.

> +	    bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
>  		int sector_nr;
>  		unsigned long csum_bitmap = 0;
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.0
>
Qu Wenruo Oct. 25, 2024, 9:15 p.m. UTC | #3
在 2024/10/26 05:14, David Sterba 写道:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 07:04:40PM +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
>> Syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref in btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap.
>> The btrfs info contains IGNOREDATACSUMS, which prevents the csum root from
>> being loaded.
>> Before filling in the csum data, check the flag BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS
>> to confirm that the csum root has been loaded.
>>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5d2b33d7835870519b5f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d2b33d7835870519b5f
>> Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
>
> Added to for-next, thanks.

Wait for a second, I believe LiZhi Xu's solution is better.

And sorry I didn't notice that until his patch is submitted.

The problem for this fix is, although it fixes the crash, it also gives
a false feel of safety that scrub is finding nothing wrong.

But the truth is, there is no csum root, and everything can go wrong.

Thus I'd prefer LiZhi's solution which error out and terminate the scrub
immediately.

Thanks,
Qu
>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
>> index 3a3427428074..1ba4d8ba902b 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
>> @@ -1602,7 +1602,8 @@ static int scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
>>   	}
>>
>>   	/* Now fill the data csum. */
>> -	if (bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
>> +	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS, &fs_info->fs_state) &&
>
> I've updatd the coment as this is double negation that could be
> confusing on a quick read.
>
>> +	    bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
>>   		int sector_nr;
>>   		unsigned long csum_bitmap = 0;
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
>
David Sterba Oct. 29, 2024, 8:55 p.m. UTC | #4
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 07:45:18AM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2024/10/26 05:14, David Sterba 写道:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 07:04:40PM +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote:
> >> Syzbot reported a null-ptr-deref in btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap.
> >> The btrfs info contains IGNOREDATACSUMS, which prevents the csum root from
> >> being loaded.
> >> Before filling in the csum data, check the flag BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS
> >> to confirm that the csum root has been loaded.
> >>
> >> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5d2b33d7835870519b5f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> >> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5d2b33d7835870519b5f
> >> Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
> >
> > Added to for-next, thanks.
> 
> Wait for a second, I believe LiZhi Xu's solution is better.
> 
> And sorry I didn't notice that until his patch is submitted.
> 
> The problem for this fix is, although it fixes the crash, it also gives
> a false feel of safety that scrub is finding nothing wrong.
> 
> But the truth is, there is no csum root, and everything can go wrong.
> 
> Thus I'd prefer LiZhi's solution which error out and terminate the scrub
> immediately.

Ok, I've dropped this patch from for-next. Please add "btrfs: add a
sanity check for btrfs root".
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 3a3427428074..1ba4d8ba902b 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -1602,7 +1602,8 @@  static int scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(struct btrfs_block_group *bg,
 	}
 
 	/* Now fill the data csum. */
-	if (bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
+	if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_NO_DATA_CSUMS, &fs_info->fs_state) &&
+	    bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
 		int sector_nr;
 		unsigned long csum_bitmap = 0;