diff mbox series

[v2,-next] i2c: qcom-cci: Remove the unused variable cci_clk_rate

Message ID 20241029020931.42311-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v2,-next] i2c: qcom-cci: Remove the unused variable cci_clk_rate | expand

Commit Message

Jiapeng Chong Oct. 29, 2024, 2:09 a.m. UTC
Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
Changes in v2:
  -Remove redundant code.

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Dmitry Baryshkov Oct. 29, 2024, 2:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
> 
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>   -Remove redundant code.
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

Fixes: 823dfb7bdb21 ("i2c: qcom-cci: Stop complaining about DT set clock rate")
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Vladimir Zapolskiy Oct. 30, 2024, 10:53 a.m. UTC | #2
On 10/29/24 04:09, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.

Variable ret is not deleted, the commit message is misleading.

> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>

With the needed change to the commit message:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Andi Shyti Oct. 31, 2024, 10:44 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Jiapeng,

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
> 
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>

thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host

Thanks,
Andi
Vladimir Zapolskiy Oct. 31, 2024, 11:13 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Andi,

On 10/31/24 12:44, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Jiapeng,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
>> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
>>
>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
>>
>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host
> 
> Thanks,
> Andi
> 

FWIW I've noticed that my Reviewed-by tag was added to the accepted change,
while it was the conditional one... Actually I don't know how to be aware
of such nuances, if only b4 tool is used, likely there is no way for it.

Hopefully I'm not too picky with it.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Vladimir Zapolskiy Oct. 31, 2024, 11:35 a.m. UTC | #5
On 10/31/24 13:13, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On 10/31/24 12:44, Andi Shyti wrote:
>> Hi Jiapeng,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
>>> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
>>>
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andi
>>
> 
> FWIW I've noticed that my Reviewed-by tag was added to the accepted change,
> while it was the conditional one... Actually I don't know how to be aware
> of such nuances, if only b4 tool is used, likely there is no way for it.
> 
> Hopefully I'm not too picky with it.

If it still matters, this one apparently unnoticed candidate would
have been a better choice:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20241031095339.76535-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Andi Shyti Oct. 31, 2024, 11:41 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi Vladimir,

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:13:24PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On 10/31/24 12:44, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Jiapeng,
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> > > Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
> > > 
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> > 
> > thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Andi
> > 
> 
> FWIW I've noticed that my Reviewed-by tag was added to the accepted change,
> while it was the conditional one... Actually I don't know how to be aware
> of such nuances, if only b4 tool is used, likely there is no way for it.

I thought the change that made your r-b conditional was the
Fixes tag, right? That is added. Have I missed anything?

(I noticed later the v3, but it's basically identical to the one
I pushed).

> Hopefully I'm not too picky with it.

Absolutely not! Please, keep pinging me if you see anything I
might have missed.

Thanks,
Andi
Vladimir Zapolskiy Oct. 31, 2024, 11:59 a.m. UTC | #7
Hi Andi,

On 10/31/24 13:41, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:13:24PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Andi,
>>
>> On 10/31/24 12:44, Andi Shyti wrote:
>>> Hi Jiapeng,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
>>>> Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>
>>> thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andi
>>>
>>
>> FWIW I've noticed that my Reviewed-by tag was added to the accepted change,
>> while it was the conditional one... Actually I don't know how to be aware
>> of such nuances, if only b4 tool is used, likely there is no way for it.
> 
> I thought the change that made your r-b conditional was the
> Fixes tag, right? That is added. Have I missed anything?

ah, no, it was about the copy-pasted commit message, which mentions a much
more popular 'ret' local variable.

> (I noticed later the v3, but it's basically identical to the one
> I pushed).
> 

Well, I believe my concern about a commit message has quite low significance,
so let it be kept as is, the most essential code change part is untouched.

>> Hopefully I'm not too picky with it.
> 
> Absolutely not! Please, keep pinging me if you see anything I
> might have missed.

Thank you!

--
Best wishes,
Vladmir
Andi Shyti Oct. 31, 2024, 12:23 p.m. UTC | #8
Hi Vladimir,

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:59:45PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 10/31/24 13:41, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 01:13:24PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> > > On 10/31/24 12:44, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:09:31AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> > > > > Variable ret is not effectively used, so delete it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > > 
> > > > thanks for your patch! Applied to i2c/i2c-host
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andi
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > FWIW I've noticed that my Reviewed-by tag was added to the accepted change,
> > > while it was the conditional one... Actually I don't know how to be aware
> > > of such nuances, if only b4 tool is used, likely there is no way for it.
> > 
> > I thought the change that made your r-b conditional was the
> > Fixes tag, right? That is added. Have I missed anything?
> 
> ah, no, it was about the copy-pasted commit message, which mentions a much
> more popular 'ret' local variable.

oh yes, the new commit message says:

"Variable cci_clk_rate is not effectively used, so delete it."

I'm sorry, I will fix it.

Thanks,
Andi
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
index 5cc791b3b57d..a0ef43e99751 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c
@@ -523,7 +523,6 @@  static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_cci_pm = {
 static int cci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
-	unsigned long cci_clk_rate = 0;
 	struct device_node *child;
 	struct resource *r;
 	struct cci *cci;
@@ -594,14 +593,6 @@  static int cci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "not enough clocks in DT\n");
 	cci->nclocks = ret;
 
-	/* Retrieve CCI clock rate */
-	for (i = 0; i < cci->nclocks; i++) {
-		if (!strcmp(cci->clocks[i].id, "cci")) {
-			cci_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(cci->clocks[i].clk);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
 	ret = cci_enable_clocks(cci);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;