| Message ID | 20241016105950.785820-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/1] platform/x86: intel: Add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically | expand |
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:59:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically. > This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust > against mistypos in the prefix. > --- > > v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker > > Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this > to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories > in question. Anyone, any comments on this? This already passed a CI tests without failure so far. Perhaps it's good to apply to show the demand of such a feature in Kbuild in the future? Because I want to do the same for various */tests/ folders where we have tons of test*, *kunit modules effectively duplicating the folder name.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:58 AM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:59:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically. > > This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust > > against mistypos in the prefix. > > > --- > > > > v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker > > > > Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this > > to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories > > in question. > > Anyone, any comments on this? > This already passed a CI tests without failure so far. Perhaps it's good > to apply to show the demand of such a feature in Kbuild in the future? > Because I want to do the same for various */tests/ folders where we have > tons of test*, *kunit modules effectively duplicating the folder name. I do not like what you are doing here, but it is up to you whatever you do in Makefiles you maintain.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 01:49:52PM +0100, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:58 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:59:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically. > > > This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust > > > against mistypos in the prefix. > > > > > --- > > > > > > v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker > > > > > > Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this > > > to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories > > > in question. > > > > Anyone, any comments on this? > > This already passed a CI tests without failure so far. Perhaps it's good > > to apply to show the demand of such a feature in Kbuild in the future? > > Because I want to do the same for various */tests/ folders where we have > > tons of test*, *kunit modules effectively duplicating the folder name. > > I do not like what you are doing here, That's why the question is to Kbuild if it's possible to have this feature available treewide for users in a form that you like? > but it is up to you whatever you do in Makefiles you maintain. Thanks! Ilpo, what do you think about applying this in its current form?
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 01:49:52PM +0100, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:58 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:59:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically. > > > > This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust > > > > against mistypos in the prefix. > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker > > > > > > > > Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this > > > > to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories > > > > in question. > > > > > > Anyone, any comments on this? > > > This already passed a CI tests without failure so far. Perhaps it's good > > > to apply to show the demand of such a feature in Kbuild in the future? > > > Because I want to do the same for various */tests/ folders where we have > > > tons of test*, *kunit modules effectively duplicating the folder name. > > > > I do not like what you are doing here, > > That's why the question is to Kbuild if it's possible to have this feature > available treewide for users in a form that you like? > > > but it is up to you whatever you do in Makefiles you maintain. > > Thanks! Ilpo, what do you think about applying this in its current form? I applied this patch now to review-ilpo branch. Hopefully we'll one day have a generic mechanism for this but until then this will have to do.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 01:49:52PM +0100, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:58 AM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 01:59:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically. > > > > > This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust > > > > > against mistypos in the prefix. ... > > > > > v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker > > > > > > > > > > Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this > > > > > to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories > > > > > in question. > > > > > > > > Anyone, any comments on this? > > > > This already passed a CI tests without failure so far. Perhaps it's good > > > > to apply to show the demand of such a feature in Kbuild in the future? > > > > Because I want to do the same for various */tests/ folders where we have > > > > tons of test*, *kunit modules effectively duplicating the folder name. > > > > > > I do not like what you are doing here, > > > > That's why the question is to Kbuild if it's possible to have this feature > > available treewide for users in a form that you like? > > > > > but it is up to you whatever you do in Makefiles you maintain. > > > > Thanks! Ilpo, what do you think about applying this in its current form? > > I applied this patch now to review-ilpo branch. Hopefully we'll one day > have a generic mechanism for this but until then this will have to do. Yeah, that's what I want to have as well... Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile index 74db065c82d6..78acb414e154 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile @@ -17,50 +17,40 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_UNCORE_FREQ_CONTROL) += uncore-frequency/ # Intel input drivers -intel-hid-y := hid.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_HID_EVENT) += intel-hid.o -intel-vbtn-y := vbtn.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_VBTN) += intel-vbtn.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_HID_EVENT) += hid.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_VBTN) += vbtn.o # Intel miscellaneous drivers -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_ISHTP_ECLITE) += ishtp_eclite.o -intel_int0002_vgpio-y := int0002_vgpio.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_INT0002_VGPIO) += intel_int0002_vgpio.o -intel_oaktrail-y := oaktrail.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_OAKTRAIL) += intel_oaktrail.o -intel_sdsi-y := sdsi.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SDSI) += intel_sdsi.o -intel_vsec-y := vsec.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_VSEC) += intel_vsec.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_INT0002_VGPIO) += int0002_vgpio.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_ISHTP_ECLITE) += ishtp_eclite.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_OAKTRAIL) += oaktrail.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SDSI) += sdsi.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_VSEC) += vsec.o # Intel PMIC / PMC / P-Unit drivers -intel_bxtwc_tmu-y := bxtwc_tmu.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_BXTWC_PMIC_TMU) += intel_bxtwc_tmu.o -intel_crystal_cove_charger-y := crystal_cove_charger.o -obj-$(CONFIG_X86_ANDROID_TABLETS) += intel_crystal_cove_charger.o -intel_bytcrc_pwrsrc-y := bytcrc_pwrsrc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_BYTCRC_PWRSRC) += intel_bytcrc_pwrsrc.o -intel_chtdc_ti_pwrbtn-y := chtdc_ti_pwrbtn.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_CHTDC_TI_PWRBTN) += intel_chtdc_ti_pwrbtn.o -intel_chtwc_int33fe-y := chtwc_int33fe.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_CHTWC_INT33FE) += intel_chtwc_int33fe.o -intel_mrfld_pwrbtn-y := mrfld_pwrbtn.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_MRFLD_PWRBTN) += intel_mrfld_pwrbtn.o -intel_punit_ipc-y := punit_ipc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PUNIT_IPC) += intel_punit_ipc.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_BYTCRC_PWRSRC) += bytcrc_pwrsrc.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_BXTWC_PMIC_TMU) += bxtwc_tmu.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_CHTDC_TI_PWRBTN) += chtdc_ti_pwrbtn.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_CHTWC_INT33FE) += chtwc_int33fe.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_X86_ANDROID_TABLETS) += crystal_cove_charger.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_MRFLD_PWRBTN) += mrfld_pwrbtn.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PUNIT_IPC) += punit_ipc.o # TPMI drivers -intel_vsec_tpmi-y := tpmi.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TPMI) += intel_vsec_tpmi.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PLR_TPMI) += intel_plr_tpmi.o - -intel_tpmi_power_domains-y := tpmi_power_domains.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TPMI_POWER_DOMAINS) += intel_tpmi_power_domains.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_PLR_TPMI) += plr_tpmi.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TPMI_POWER_DOMAINS) += tpmi_power_domains.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TPMI) += vsec_tpmi.o # Intel Uncore drivers -intel-rst-y := rst.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RST) += intel-rst.o -intel-smartconnect-y := smartconnect.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SMARTCONNECT) += intel-smartconnect.o -intel_turbo_max_3-y := turbo_max_3.o -obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3) += intel_turbo_max_3.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RST) += rst.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SMARTCONNECT) += smartconnect.o +intel-target-$(CONFIG_INTEL_TURBO_MAX_3) += turbo_max_3.o + +# Add 'intel' prefix to each module listed in intel-target-* +define INTEL_OBJ_TARGET +intel-$(1)-y := $(1).o +obj-$(2) += intel-$(1).o +endef + +$(foreach target, $(basename $(intel-target-y)), $(eval $(call INTEL_OBJ_TARGET,$(target),y))) +$(foreach target, $(basename $(intel-target-m)), $(eval $(call INTEL_OBJ_TARGET,$(target),m))) diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c similarity index 100% rename from drivers/platform/x86/intel/intel_plr_tpmi.c rename to drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c similarity index 99% rename from drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c rename to drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c index 486ddc9b3592..c637e32048a3 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/tpmi.c +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/vsec_tpmi.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only /* - * intel-tpmi : Driver to enumerate TPMI features and create devices + * Driver to enumerate TPMI features and create devices * * Copyright (c) 2023, Intel Corporation. * All Rights Reserved.
Rework Makefile to add 'intel' prefix to the modules automatically. This removes a lot of boilerplate code in it and also makes robust against mistypos in the prefix. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- v2: fixed obvious typos (LKP), Cc'ed to Kbuild ML (Ilpo), dropped RFC marker Note to Kbuild people: TBH I rather want to have something like this to be available on the level of Kbuild for any of the subdirectories in question. drivers/platform/x86/intel/Makefile | 68 ++++++++----------- .../intel/{intel_plr_tpmi.c => plr_tpmi.c} | 0 .../x86/intel/{tpmi.c => vsec_tpmi.c} | 2 +- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) rename drivers/platform/x86/intel/{intel_plr_tpmi.c => plr_tpmi.c} (100%) rename drivers/platform/x86/intel/{tpmi.c => vsec_tpmi.c} (99%)