| Message ID | 20241021063903.793166-4-trunixs.kim@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Document ExynosAutoV920 watchdog bindings | expand |
On 21/10/2024 08:39, Taewan Kim wrote: > From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> > > Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com> > --- > .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) How did this happen that this patch was taken to watchdog? There is no Ack here from me. Drop this patch from watchdog, I do no agree to take it via that tree. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzystof, > On 21/10/2024 08:39, Taewan Kim wrote: > > From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> > > > > Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> > > Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com> > > --- > > .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > > How did this happen that this patch was taken to watchdog? There is no > Ack here from me. > > Drop this patch from watchdog, I do no agree to take it via that tree. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Seems like you are having a hard day. The 3 patches are dropped. I presume that you will take them all through your tree then? Kind regards, Wim. PS: the patches are: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: Document ExynosAutoV920 watchdog bindings [PATCH v3 2/3] watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: add support for exynosautov920 SoC [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: add watchdog DT node
Hi Krzystof, > On 07/11/2024 11:33, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > > Hi Krzystof, > > > >> On 21/10/2024 08:39, Taewan Kim wrote: > >>> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> > >>> > >>> Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> > >>> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com> > >>> --- > >>> .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) > >> > >> How did this happen that this patch was taken to watchdog? There is no > >> Ack here from me. > >> > >> Drop this patch from watchdog, I do no agree to take it via that tree. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Krzysztof > >> > > > > Seems like you are having a hard day. > > The 3 patches are dropped. I presume that you will take them all through your tree then? > > I meant only this one patch, not entire patchset. The bindings and > watchdog driver are for you. I commented only about this patch here - DTS. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > I added the first two patches again. Even when it sounds more logical to me to keep the 3 together. But that's a never ending discussion, so we won't go into that :-). Kind regards, Wim.
On 07/11/2024 11:33, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Krzystof, > >> On 21/10/2024 08:39, Taewan Kim wrote: >>> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> >>> >>> Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) >> >> How did this happen that this patch was taken to watchdog? There is no >> Ack here from me. >> >> Drop this patch from watchdog, I do no agree to take it via that tree. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> > > Seems like you are having a hard day. > The 3 patches are dropped. I presume that you will take them all through your tree then? I meant only this one patch, not entire patchset. The bindings and watchdog driver are for you. I commented only about this patch here - DTS. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 07/11/2024 12:33, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: >>> Seems like you are having a hard day. >>> The 3 patches are dropped. I presume that you will take them all through your tree then? >> >> I meant only this one patch, not entire patchset. The bindings and >> watchdog driver are for you. I commented only about this patch here - DTS. >> >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> > > I added the first two patches again. Even when it sounds more logical to me to keep the 3 together. Thank you. > But that's a never ending discussion, so we won't go into that :-). DTS is hardware description independent from Linux, therefore always goes separate way than Linux drivers. Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi index 91882b37fdb3..2b3e8debda3d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi @@ -172,6 +172,26 @@ chipid@10000000 { reg = <0x10000000 0x24>; }; + watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-wdt"; + reg = <0x10060000 0x100>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 953 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&xtcxo>, <&xtcxo>; + clock-names = "watchdog", "watchdog_src"; + samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_system_controller>; + samsung,cluster-index = <0>; + }; + + watchdog_cl1: watchdog@10070000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-wdt"; + reg = <0x10070000 0x100>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 952 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&xtcxo>, <&xtcxo>; + clock-names = "watchdog", "watchdog_src"; + samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_system_controller>; + samsung,cluster-index = <1>; + }; + gic: interrupt-controller@10400000 { compatible = "arm,gic-v3"; #interrupt-cells = <3>;