Message ID | 20241031133723.303835-1-ming.lei@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | block: freeze/unfreeze lockdep fixes | expand |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 09:37:16PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > Hello, > > The 1st patch removes blk_freeze_queue(). > > The 2nd patch fixes freeze uses in rbd. > > The 3rd patches fixes potential unfreeze lock verification on non-owner > context. > > The 4th patch doesn't verify io lock in elevator_init_mq() for fixing > false lockdep warning. > > V2: > - drop patch 1 and fix rbd by adding unfreeze (Christoph) > - add reviewed-by Hi Jens, This patchset fixes several lockdep false positive warnings, can you merge them if you are fine? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Zym_h_EYRVX18dSw@fedora/ thanks, Ming
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 8:24 AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 09:37:16PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The 1st patch removes blk_freeze_queue(). > > > > The 2nd patch fixes freeze uses in rbd. > > > > The 3rd patches fixes potential unfreeze lock verification on non-owner > > context. > > > > The 4th patch doesn't verify io lock in elevator_init_mq() for fixing > > false lockdep warning. > > > > V2: > > - drop patch 1 and fix rbd by adding unfreeze (Christoph) > > - add reviewed-by > > Hi Jens, > > This patchset fixes several lockdep false positive warnings, can you > merge them if you are fine? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Zym_h_EYRVX18dSw@fedora/ Hi Jens, There are lots of lockdep reports which need the fixes, so ping... Thanks,
On 11/7/24 4:21 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 8:24?AM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 09:37:16PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The 1st patch removes blk_freeze_queue(). >>> >>> The 2nd patch fixes freeze uses in rbd. >>> >>> The 3rd patches fixes potential unfreeze lock verification on non-owner >>> context. >>> >>> The 4th patch doesn't verify io lock in elevator_init_mq() for fixing >>> false lockdep warning. >>> >>> V2: >>> - drop patch 1 and fix rbd by adding unfreeze (Christoph) >>> - add reviewed-by >> >> Hi Jens, >> >> This patchset fixes several lockdep false positive warnings, can you >> merge them if you are fine? >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/Zym_h_EYRVX18dSw@fedora/ > > Hi Jens, > > There are lots of lockdep reports which need the fixes, so ping... Oops indeed, not sure why I missed this one.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 21:37:16 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > The 1st patch removes blk_freeze_queue(). > > The 2nd patch fixes freeze uses in rbd. > > The 3rd patches fixes potential unfreeze lock verification on non-owner > context. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/4] block: remove blk_freeze_queue() commit: 54027869df83aceccd18c4a799b263a2b318b065 [2/4] rbd: unfreeze queue after marking disk as dead commit: a471977780cc8ba809f84e3e2289d676063e7547 [3/4] block: always verify unfreeze lock on the owner task commit: 6a78699838a0ddeed3620ddf50c1521f1fe1e811 [4/4] block: don't verify IO lock for freeze/unfreeze in elevator_init_mq() commit: 357e1b7f730bd85a383e7afa75a3caba329c5707 Best regards,