| Message ID | 20241116101120.323174-1-stsp2@yandex.ru (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Rejected |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [net-next,v3] af_unix: pass pidfd flags via SCM_PIDFD cmsg | expand |
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:11:20 +0300 > Currently SCM_PIDFD cmsg cannot be sent via unix socket > (returns -EINVAL) and SO_PASSPIDFD doesn't support flags. > The created pidfd always has flags set to 0. > > This patch implements SCM_PIDFD cmsg in AF_UNIX socket, which > can be used to send flags to SO_PASSPIDFD-enabled recipient. > > Self-test is added for the propagation of PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag. > > This is mainly needed for the future extensions, like eg this one: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8288a08e-448b-43c2-82dc-59f87d0d9072@yandex.ru/T/#me1237e46deba8574b77834b7704e63559ffef9cb > where it was suggested to try solving the supplementary groups > problem with pidfd. > > Changes in v3: specify target tree in patch subject It seems you missed other feedback, especially __scm_recv_common() needs a small change. net-next is closed during the merge window for v6.13-rc1, so please post v4 after Dec 2nd. https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241118071654.695bb1a2@kernel.org/
18.11.2024 20:54, Kuniyuki Iwashima пишет: > From: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> > Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:11:20 +0300 >> Currently SCM_PIDFD cmsg cannot be sent via unix socket >> (returns -EINVAL) and SO_PASSPIDFD doesn't support flags. >> The created pidfd always has flags set to 0. >> >> This patch implements SCM_PIDFD cmsg in AF_UNIX socket, which >> can be used to send flags to SO_PASSPIDFD-enabled recipient. >> >> Self-test is added for the propagation of PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag. >> >> This is mainly needed for the future extensions, like eg this one: >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8288a08e-448b-43c2-82dc-59f87d0d9072@yandex.ru/T/#me1237e46deba8574b77834b7704e63559ffef9cb >> where it was suggested to try solving the supplementary groups >> problem with pidfd. >> >> Changes in v3: specify target tree in patch subject > It seems you missed other feedback, especially __scm_recv_common() > needs a small change. Yes, sorry. :( Too long quotes. And what's worse, I've just found this and many other lkml e-mails in spam. I was under deep impression that no one replies to me. Sigh. E-mail sucks. Or just me. > net-next is closed during the merge window for v6.13-rc1, so please > post v4 after Dec 2nd. > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241118071654.695bb1a2@kernel.org/ Ok, thank you!
>Currently SCM_PIDFD cmsg cannot be sent via unix socket >(returns -EINVAL) and SO_PASSPIDFD doesn't support flags. >The created pidfd always has flags set to 0. > >This patch implements SCM_PIDFD cmsg in AF_UNIX socket, which >can be used to send flags to SO_PASSPIDFD-enabled recipient. > >Self-test is added for the propagation of PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag. >This is mainly needed for the future extensions, like eg this one: >https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8288a08e-448b-43c2-82dc-59f87d0d9072@yandex.ru/T/#me1237e46deba8574b77834b7704e63559ffef9cb >where it was suggested to try solving the supplementary groups >problem with pidfd. > >Changes in v3: specify target tree in patch subject >Changes in v2: remove flags validation in scm_pidfd_recv(), as > suggested by Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> > >Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> ... >diff --git a/include/linux/pidfs.h b/include/linux/pidfs.h >index 75bdf9807802..c4c5c1a0c2ad 100644 >--- a/include/linux/pidfs.h >+++ b/include/linux/pidfs.h >@@ -2,7 +2,16 @@ > #ifndef _LINUX_PID_FS_H > #define _LINUX_PID_FS_H > >+#include <uapi/linux/pidfd.h> >+ > struct file *pidfs_alloc_file(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags); > void __init pidfs_init(void); > >+static inline int pidfd_validate_flags(unsigned int flags) >+{ >+ if (flags & ~(PIDFD_NONBLOCK | PIDFD_THREAD)) >+ return -EINVAL; >+ return 0; >+} >+ > #endif /* _LINUX_PID_FS_H */ >diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h >index d18cc47e89bd..ee27d391e5aa 100644 >--- a/include/linux/socket.h >+++ b/include/linux/socket.h >@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline size_t msg_data_left(struct msghdr *msg) > #define SCM_RIGHTS 0x01 /* rw: access rights (array of int) */ > #define SCM_CREDENTIALS 0x02 /* rw: struct ucred */ > #define SCM_SECURITY 0x03 /* rw: security label */ >-#define SCM_PIDFD 0x04 /* ro: pidfd (int) */ >+#define SCM_PIDFD 0x04 /* r: pidfd, w: pidfd_flags (int) */ > > struct ucred { > __u32 pid; >diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h >index 63129c79b8cb..4bc197548c2f 100644 >--- a/include/net/af_unix.h >+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h >@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct unix_skb_parms { > #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK > u32 secid; /* Security ID */ > #endif >+ u32 pidfd_flags; > u32 consumed; > } __randomize_layout; > >diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h >index 0d35c7c77a74..1326edcacacb 100644 >--- a/include/net/scm.h >+++ b/include/net/scm.h >@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct scm_cookie { > #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK > u32 secid; /* Passed security ID */ > #endif >+ u32 pidfd_flags; > }; > > void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm); >@@ -154,7 +155,7 @@ static __inline__ void scm_pidfd_recv(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm > if (!scm->pid) > return; > >- pidfd = pidfd_prepare(scm->pid, 0, &pidfd_file); >+ pidfd = pidfd_prepare(scm->pid, scm->pidfd_flags, &pidfd_file); > > if (put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_PIDFD, sizeof(int), &pidfd)) { > if (pidfd_file) { >diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c >index 2715afb77eab..b1100ae8ea63 100644 >--- a/kernel/pid.c >+++ b/kernel/pid.c >@@ -629,10 +629,12 @@ static int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags) > SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags) > { > int fd; >+ int err; > struct pid *p; > >- if (flags & ~(PIDFD_NONBLOCK | PIDFD_THREAD)) >- return -EINVAL; >+ err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); >+ if (err) >+ return err; > > if (pid <= 0) > return -EINVAL; >diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c >index 4f6a14babe5a..3bcdecdacd7e 100644 >--- a/net/core/scm.c >+++ b/net/core/scm.c >@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include <linux/security.h> > #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> > #include <linux/pid.h> >+#include <linux/pidfs.h> > #include <linux/nsproxy.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/errqueue.h> >@@ -210,6 +211,19 @@ int __scm_send(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *p) > p->creds.gid = gid; > break; > } >+ case SCM_PIDFD: >+ { >+ unsigned int flags; >+ >+ if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(flags))) > Hi Stas! Hmm, it is a bit unusual that SCM_PIDFD message format is different in case when you send it and when you read it. I mean that when you read it (on the receiver side) you get pidfd file descriptor number, while when you write it (on the sender side) you are only allowed to send one integer and this time it's a pidfd file descriptor flags. I personally have nothing strictly against that but just found this a bit unusual and probably confusing for userspace programmers. Compare it with SCM_CREDENTIALS, for instance, where we read/write the same structure struct ucred. >+ goto error; >+ memcpy(&flags, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), sizeof(flags)); >+ err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); pidfd_validate_flags allows PIDFD_THREAD, but what's the idea behind this if scm->pid is always a thread-group leader? (see maybe_add_creds() function). Sorry if I misunderstand something just want to ensure that we are on the same page. Kind regards, Alex
21.11.2024 15:57, Alexander Mikhalitsyn пишет: > Hi Stas! > > Hmm, it is a bit unusual that SCM_PIDFD message format is different in case > when you send it and when you read it. > > I mean that when you read it (on the receiver side) you get pidfd file descriptor number, > while when you write it (on the sender side) you are only allowed to send one integer and this time it's > a pidfd file descriptor flags. I personally have nothing strictly against that but just found this > a bit unusual and probably confusing for userspace programmers. > > Compare it with SCM_CREDENTIALS, for instance, where we read/write the same structure struct ucred. SCM_PIDFD_FLAGS can be added instead. But as you currently can't send SCM_PIDFD, and won't be able to receive SCM_PIDFD_FLAGS if it is added, then nothing prevents the reuse of an existing value. So among the possible solutions is to have SCM_PIDFD_FLAGS as an alias to SCM_PIDFD. Should I do that? >> + goto error; >> + memcpy(&flags, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), sizeof(flags)); >> + err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); > pidfd_validate_flags allows PIDFD_THREAD, but what's the idea behind this if > scm->pid is always a thread-group leader? (see maybe_add_creds() function). > > Sorry if I misunderstand something just want to ensure that we are on the same page. The idea is to cover only PIDFD_NONBLOCK for now, and add new flags after. Of course if PIDFD_NONBLOCK+future extensions sounds not very convincing, then I'll have to send those "new flag" patches together with this one. As you can see, the supplied test-case only covers PIDFD_NONBLOCK. You can decide whether or not it is valuable/acceptable on its own. Speaking of PIDFD_THREAD, one can add tid to creds for this to work. I don't need such functionality, so instead I can as well disallow sending this flag until someone else needs it. But it looks potentially useful, so adding tid can also be considered and looks simple enough. What do you think?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 01:57:32PM +0100, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote: > >Currently SCM_PIDFD cmsg cannot be sent via unix socket > >(returns -EINVAL) and SO_PASSPIDFD doesn't support flags. > >The created pidfd always has flags set to 0. > > > >This patch implements SCM_PIDFD cmsg in AF_UNIX socket, which > >can be used to send flags to SO_PASSPIDFD-enabled recipient. > > > >Self-test is added for the propagation of PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag. > > >This is mainly needed for the future extensions, like eg this one: > >https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8288a08e-448b-43c2-82dc-59f87d0d9072@yandex.ru/T/#me1237e46deba8574b77834b7704e63559ffef9cb > >where it was suggested to try solving the supplementary groups > >problem with pidfd. > > > >Changes in v3: specify target tree in patch subject > >Changes in v2: remove flags validation in scm_pidfd_recv(), as > > suggested by Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> > > > >Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> > > ... > > >diff --git a/include/linux/pidfs.h b/include/linux/pidfs.h > >index 75bdf9807802..c4c5c1a0c2ad 100644 > >--- a/include/linux/pidfs.h > >+++ b/include/linux/pidfs.h > >@@ -2,7 +2,16 @@ > > #ifndef _LINUX_PID_FS_H > > #define _LINUX_PID_FS_H > > > >+#include <uapi/linux/pidfd.h> > >+ > > struct file *pidfs_alloc_file(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags); > > void __init pidfs_init(void); > > > >+static inline int pidfd_validate_flags(unsigned int flags) > >+{ > >+ if (flags & ~(PIDFD_NONBLOCK | PIDFD_THREAD)) > >+ return -EINVAL; > >+ return 0; > >+} > >+ > > #endif /* _LINUX_PID_FS_H */ > >diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h > >index d18cc47e89bd..ee27d391e5aa 100644 > >--- a/include/linux/socket.h > >+++ b/include/linux/socket.h > >@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline size_t msg_data_left(struct msghdr *msg) > > #define SCM_RIGHTS 0x01 /* rw: access rights (array of int) */ > > #define SCM_CREDENTIALS 0x02 /* rw: struct ucred */ > > #define SCM_SECURITY 0x03 /* rw: security label */ > >-#define SCM_PIDFD 0x04 /* ro: pidfd (int) */ > >+#define SCM_PIDFD 0x04 /* r: pidfd, w: pidfd_flags (int) */ > > > > struct ucred { > > __u32 pid; > >diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h > >index 63129c79b8cb..4bc197548c2f 100644 > >--- a/include/net/af_unix.h > >+++ b/include/net/af_unix.h > >@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct unix_skb_parms { > > #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK > > u32 secid; /* Security ID */ > > #endif > >+ u32 pidfd_flags; > > u32 consumed; > > } __randomize_layout; > > > >diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h > >index 0d35c7c77a74..1326edcacacb 100644 > >--- a/include/net/scm.h > >+++ b/include/net/scm.h > >@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct scm_cookie { > > #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK > > u32 secid; /* Passed security ID */ > > #endif > >+ u32 pidfd_flags; > > }; > > > > void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm); > >@@ -154,7 +155,7 @@ static __inline__ void scm_pidfd_recv(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm > > if (!scm->pid) > > return; > > > >- pidfd = pidfd_prepare(scm->pid, 0, &pidfd_file); > >+ pidfd = pidfd_prepare(scm->pid, scm->pidfd_flags, &pidfd_file); > > > > if (put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_PIDFD, sizeof(int), &pidfd)) { > > if (pidfd_file) { > >diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c > >index 2715afb77eab..b1100ae8ea63 100644 > >--- a/kernel/pid.c > >+++ b/kernel/pid.c > >@@ -629,10 +629,12 @@ static int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags) > > SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags) > > { > > int fd; > >+ int err; > > struct pid *p; > > > >- if (flags & ~(PIDFD_NONBLOCK | PIDFD_THREAD)) > >- return -EINVAL; > >+ err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); > >+ if (err) > >+ return err; > > > > if (pid <= 0) > > return -EINVAL; > >diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c > >index 4f6a14babe5a..3bcdecdacd7e 100644 > >--- a/net/core/scm.c > >+++ b/net/core/scm.c > >@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > > #include <linux/security.h> > > #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> > > #include <linux/pid.h> > >+#include <linux/pidfs.h> > > #include <linux/nsproxy.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/errqueue.h> > >@@ -210,6 +211,19 @@ int __scm_send(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *p) > > p->creds.gid = gid; > > break; > > } > >+ case SCM_PIDFD: > >+ { > >+ unsigned int flags; > >+ > >+ if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(flags))) > > > > Hi Stas! > > Hmm, it is a bit unusual that SCM_PIDFD message format is different in case > when you send it and when you read it. > > I mean that when you read it (on the receiver side) you get pidfd file descriptor number, > while when you write it (on the sender side) you are only allowed to send one integer and this time it's > a pidfd file descriptor flags. I personally have nothing strictly against that but just found this > a bit unusual and probably confusing for userspace programmers. > > Compare it with SCM_CREDENTIALS, for instance, where we read/write the same structure struct ucred. > > >+ goto error; > >+ memcpy(&flags, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), sizeof(flags)); > >+ err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); > > pidfd_validate_flags allows PIDFD_THREAD, but what's the idea behind this if > scm->pid is always a thread-group leader? (see maybe_add_creds() function). > > Sorry if I misunderstand something just want to ensure that we are on the same page. The sender will not be put in control of what flags the pidfd will be created on the receivers side. That's just an invitation for subtle bugs. The receiver can always toggle O_NONBLOCK via a fcntl() on the pidfd once it received it. The whole flag thing should be dropped. The format change is also an api break which is another reason this won't happen.
diff --git a/include/linux/pidfs.h b/include/linux/pidfs.h index 75bdf9807802..c4c5c1a0c2ad 100644 --- a/include/linux/pidfs.h +++ b/include/linux/pidfs.h @@ -2,7 +2,16 @@ #ifndef _LINUX_PID_FS_H #define _LINUX_PID_FS_H +#include <uapi/linux/pidfd.h> + struct file *pidfs_alloc_file(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags); void __init pidfs_init(void); +static inline int pidfd_validate_flags(unsigned int flags) +{ + if (flags & ~(PIDFD_NONBLOCK | PIDFD_THREAD)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} + #endif /* _LINUX_PID_FS_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/socket.h b/include/linux/socket.h index d18cc47e89bd..ee27d391e5aa 100644 --- a/include/linux/socket.h +++ b/include/linux/socket.h @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline size_t msg_data_left(struct msghdr *msg) #define SCM_RIGHTS 0x01 /* rw: access rights (array of int) */ #define SCM_CREDENTIALS 0x02 /* rw: struct ucred */ #define SCM_SECURITY 0x03 /* rw: security label */ -#define SCM_PIDFD 0x04 /* ro: pidfd (int) */ +#define SCM_PIDFD 0x04 /* r: pidfd, w: pidfd_flags (int) */ struct ucred { __u32 pid; diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h index 63129c79b8cb..4bc197548c2f 100644 --- a/include/net/af_unix.h +++ b/include/net/af_unix.h @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct unix_skb_parms { #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK u32 secid; /* Security ID */ #endif + u32 pidfd_flags; u32 consumed; } __randomize_layout; diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h index 0d35c7c77a74..1326edcacacb 100644 --- a/include/net/scm.h +++ b/include/net/scm.h @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct scm_cookie { #ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK u32 secid; /* Passed security ID */ #endif + u32 pidfd_flags; }; void scm_detach_fds(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm); @@ -154,7 +155,7 @@ static __inline__ void scm_pidfd_recv(struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *scm if (!scm->pid) return; - pidfd = pidfd_prepare(scm->pid, 0, &pidfd_file); + pidfd = pidfd_prepare(scm->pid, scm->pidfd_flags, &pidfd_file); if (put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_PIDFD, sizeof(int), &pidfd)) { if (pidfd_file) { diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c index 2715afb77eab..b1100ae8ea63 100644 --- a/kernel/pid.c +++ b/kernel/pid.c @@ -629,10 +629,12 @@ static int pidfd_create(struct pid *pid, unsigned int flags) SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pidfd_open, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, flags) { int fd; + int err; struct pid *p; - if (flags & ~(PIDFD_NONBLOCK | PIDFD_THREAD)) - return -EINVAL; + err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); + if (err) + return err; if (pid <= 0) return -EINVAL; diff --git a/net/core/scm.c b/net/core/scm.c index 4f6a14babe5a..3bcdecdacd7e 100644 --- a/net/core/scm.c +++ b/net/core/scm.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include <linux/security.h> #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> #include <linux/pid.h> +#include <linux/pidfs.h> #include <linux/nsproxy.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/errqueue.h> @@ -210,6 +211,19 @@ int __scm_send(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct scm_cookie *p) p->creds.gid = gid; break; } + case SCM_PIDFD: + { + unsigned int flags; + + if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(flags))) + goto error; + memcpy(&flags, CMSG_DATA(cmsg), sizeof(flags)); + err = pidfd_validate_flags(flags); + if (err) + goto error; + p->pidfd_flags = flags; + break; + } default: goto error; } diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c index 039be95c40cf..d1fce437c035 100644 --- a/net/core/sock.c +++ b/net/core/sock.c @@ -2930,6 +2930,7 @@ int __sock_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct cmsghdr *cmsg, /* SCM_RIGHTS and SCM_CREDENTIALS are semantically in SOL_UNIX. */ case SCM_RIGHTS: case SCM_CREDENTIALS: + case SCM_PIDFD: break; default: return -EINVAL; diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 001ccc55ef0f..8b19dfec0221 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -1892,6 +1892,7 @@ static int unix_scm_to_skb(struct scm_cookie *scm, struct sk_buff *skb, bool sen UNIXCB(skb).uid = scm->creds.uid; UNIXCB(skb).gid = scm->creds.gid; UNIXCB(skb).fp = NULL; + UNIXCB(skb).pidfd_flags = scm->pidfd_flags; unix_get_secdata(scm, skb); if (scm->fp && send_fds) err = unix_attach_fds(scm, skb); @@ -2486,6 +2487,7 @@ int __unix_dgram_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size, memset(&scm, 0, sizeof(scm)); scm_set_cred(&scm, UNIXCB(skb).pid, UNIXCB(skb).uid, UNIXCB(skb).gid); + scm.pidfd_flags = UNIXCB(skb).pidfd_flags; unix_set_secdata(&scm, skb); if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) { @@ -2873,6 +2875,7 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state, test_bit(SOCK_PASSPIDFD, &sock->flags)) { /* Copy credentials */ scm_set_cred(&scm, UNIXCB(skb).pid, UNIXCB(skb).uid, UNIXCB(skb).gid); + scm.pidfd_flags = UNIXCB(skb).pidfd_flags; unix_set_secdata(&scm, skb); check_creds = true; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c index 7e534594167e..1e70ff253a1d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #include <stddef.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> +#include <fcntl.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <linux/socket.h> #include <unistd.h> @@ -15,6 +16,11 @@ #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/wait.h> +/* There are problems including linux/pidfd.h, so define. */ +#ifndef PIDFD_NONBLOCK +#define PIDFD_NONBLOCK O_NONBLOCK +#endif + #include "../../kselftest_harness.h" #define clean_errno() (errno == 0 ? "None" : strerror(errno)) @@ -126,7 +132,7 @@ static pid_t get_pid_from_fdinfo_file(int pidfd, const char *key, size_t keylen) return result; } -static int cmsg_check(int fd) +static int cmsg_check(int fd, unsigned int pidfd_flags) { struct msghdr msg = { 0 }; struct cmsghdr *cmsg; @@ -136,6 +142,7 @@ static int cmsg_check(int fd) char control[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct ucred)) + CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))] = { 0 }; int *pidfd = NULL; + unsigned int flags; pid_t parent_pid; int err; @@ -197,6 +204,13 @@ static int cmsg_check(int fd) return 1; } + flags = fcntl(*pidfd, F_GETFL, 0); + flags &= ~O_ACCMODE; + if (flags != pidfd_flags) { + log_err("SCM_PIDFD flags mismatch: %x != %x", flags, pidfd_flags); + return 1; + } + /* pidfd from SCM_PIDFD should point to the parent process PID */ parent_pid = get_pid_from_fdinfo_file(*pidfd, "Pid:", sizeof("Pid:") - 1); @@ -227,30 +241,49 @@ FIXTURE_VARIANT(scm_pidfd) { int type; bool abstract; + unsigned int flags; }; FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(scm_pidfd, stream_pathname) { .type = SOCK_STREAM, .abstract = 0, + .flags = 0, }; FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(scm_pidfd, stream_abstract) { .type = SOCK_STREAM, .abstract = 1, + .flags = 0, }; FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(scm_pidfd, dgram_pathname) { .type = SOCK_DGRAM, .abstract = 0, + .flags = 0, }; FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(scm_pidfd, dgram_abstract) { .type = SOCK_DGRAM, .abstract = 1, + .flags = 0, +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(scm_pidfd, stream_nonblock) +{ + .type = SOCK_STREAM, + .abstract = 0, + .flags = PIDFD_NONBLOCK, +}; + +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(scm_pidfd, dgram_nonblock) +{ + .type = SOCK_DGRAM, + .abstract = 0, + .flags = PIDFD_NONBLOCK, }; FIXTURE_SETUP(scm_pidfd) @@ -335,7 +368,7 @@ static void client(FIXTURE_DATA(scm_pidfd) *self, close(self->startup_pipe[1]); - if (cmsg_check(cfd)) { + if (cmsg_check(cfd, variant->flags)) { log_err("cmsg_check failed"); child_die(); } @@ -375,6 +408,27 @@ TEST_F(scm_pidfd, test) int err; int pfd; int child_status = 0; + char iobuf; + unsigned int pidfd_flags; + struct msghdr msg = { 0 }; + struct cmsghdr *cmsg; + struct iovec io = { + .iov_base = &iobuf, + .iov_len = sizeof(iobuf) + }; + union { + char buf[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(pidfd_flags))]; + struct cmsghdr align; + } u; + + msg.msg_iov = &io; + msg.msg_iovlen = 1; + msg.msg_control = u.buf; + msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(u.buf); + cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(&msg); + cmsg->cmsg_level = SOL_SOCKET; + cmsg->cmsg_type = SCM_PIDFD; + cmsg->cmsg_len = CMSG_LEN(sizeof(pidfd_flags)); self->server = socket(AF_UNIX, variant->type, 0); ASSERT_NE(-1, self->server); @@ -414,12 +468,16 @@ TEST_F(scm_pidfd, test) close(self->startup_pipe[0]); if (variant->type == SOCK_DGRAM) { - err = sendto(pfd, "x", sizeof(char), 0, (struct sockaddr *)&self->client_addr->listen_addr, self->client_addr->addrlen); - ASSERT_NE(-1, err); - } else { - err = send(pfd, "x", sizeof(char), 0); + err = connect(pfd, + (struct sockaddr *)&self->client_addr->listen_addr, + self->client_addr->addrlen); ASSERT_NE(-1, err); } + iobuf = 'x'; + pidfd_flags = variant->flags; + memcpy(CMSG_DATA(cmsg), &pidfd_flags, sizeof(pidfd_flags)); + err = sendmsg(pfd, &msg, 0); + ASSERT_NE(-1, err); close(pfd); waitpid(self->client_pid, &child_status, 0);
Currently SCM_PIDFD cmsg cannot be sent via unix socket (returns -EINVAL) and SO_PASSPIDFD doesn't support flags. The created pidfd always has flags set to 0. This patch implements SCM_PIDFD cmsg in AF_UNIX socket, which can be used to send flags to SO_PASSPIDFD-enabled recipient. Self-test is added for the propagation of PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag. This is mainly needed for the future extensions, like eg this one: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8288a08e-448b-43c2-82dc-59f87d0d9072@yandex.ru/T/#me1237e46deba8574b77834b7704e63559ffef9cb where it was suggested to try solving the supplementary groups problem with pidfd. Changes in v3: specify target tree in patch subject Changes in v2: remove flags validation in scm_pidfd_recv(), as suggested by Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> CC: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> CC: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> CC: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> CC: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> CC: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> CC: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de> CC: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> CC: Tycho Andersen <tandersen@netflix.com> CC: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> CC: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> CC: Gou Hao <gouhao@uniontech.com> CC: Abhishek Chauhan <quic_abchauha@quicinc.com> CC: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> CC: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> CC: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org --- include/linux/pidfs.h | 9 +++ include/linux/socket.h | 2 +- include/net/af_unix.h | 1 + include/net/scm.h | 3 +- kernel/pid.c | 6 +- net/core/scm.c | 14 ++++ net/core/sock.c | 1 + net/unix/af_unix.c | 3 + .../testing/selftests/net/af_unix/scm_pidfd.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++-- 9 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)