Message ID | 1453d9d1513fa03098f5bf4d2fbecb29f7fd1332.1732488201.git.wqu@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | btrfs: use PTR_ERR() instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() for btrfs_get_extent() | expand |
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index e629d2ee152a..438974d4def4 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static int submit_one_sector(struct btrfs_inode *inode, em = btrfs_get_extent(inode, NULL, filepos, sectorsize); if (IS_ERR(em)) - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(em); + return PTR_ERR(em); extent_offset = filepos - em->start; em_end = extent_map_end(em);
The function btrfs_get_extent() will only return an PTR_ERR() or a valid extent map pointer. It will not return NULL. Thus the usage of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() inside submit_one_sector() is not needed, use plain PTR_ERR() instead, and that is the only usage of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() after btrfs_get_extent(). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)