diff mbox series

tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier

Message ID 20241128025551.2868-1-liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series tools/bpf: bpftool:Fix the wrong format specifier | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

liujing Nov. 28, 2024, 2:55 a.m. UTC 
The output format of unsigned int should be %u, and the output
format of int should be %d, so fix it.

Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov Nov. 28, 2024, 3:07 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 6:56 PM liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> The output format of unsigned int should be %u, and the output
> format of int should be %d, so fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>

same issue. full name pls.

pw-bot: cr
Quentin Monnet Nov. 28, 2024, 9:58 a.m. UTC | #2 
Please drop the "tools/bpf: " part of the prefix in your patch title,
it's enough to keep "bpftool: ".


2024-11-28 10:55 UTC+0800 ~ liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> The output format of unsigned int should be %u, and the output
> format of int should be %d, so fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: liujing <liujing@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> 
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c
> index 5f65140b003b..97e1e1dbc842 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int do_xdp_dump_one(struct nlattr *attr, unsigned int ifindex,
>  	NET_START_OBJECT;
>  	if (name)
>  		NET_DUMP_STR("devname", "%s", name);
> -	NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%d)", ifindex);
> +	NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%u)", ifindex);
>  
>  	if (mode == XDP_ATTACHED_MULTI) {
>  		if (json_output) {
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int do_filter_dump(struct tcmsg *info, struct nlattr **tb, const char *kind,
>  		NET_START_OBJECT;
>  		if (devname[0] != '\0')
>  			NET_DUMP_STR("devname", "%s", devname);
> -		NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%u)", ifindex);
> +		NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%d)", ifindex);
>  		NET_DUMP_STR("kind", " %s", kind);
>  		ret = do_bpf_filter_dump(tb[TCA_OPTIONS]);
>  		NET_END_OBJECT_FINAL;


Thanks for this. The second chunk is not enough to fix the format
specifier cleanly, because NET_DUMP_UINT() may end up calling:

	jsonw_printf(self, "%"PRIu64, num);

So you probably need to add a NET_DUMP_INT() wrapper and call it here.

There's also another occurrence of the macro called on a signed
"ifindex" in net.c, in __show_dev_tc_bpf(), using "(%u)". Let's fix it
in the same patch, please?

Thanks,
Quentin
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c
index 5f65140b003b..97e1e1dbc842 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/netlink_dumper.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@  static int do_xdp_dump_one(struct nlattr *attr, unsigned int ifindex,
 	NET_START_OBJECT;
 	if (name)
 		NET_DUMP_STR("devname", "%s", name);
-	NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%d)", ifindex);
+	NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%u)", ifindex);
 
 	if (mode == XDP_ATTACHED_MULTI) {
 		if (json_output) {
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@  int do_filter_dump(struct tcmsg *info, struct nlattr **tb, const char *kind,
 		NET_START_OBJECT;
 		if (devname[0] != '\0')
 			NET_DUMP_STR("devname", "%s", devname);
-		NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%u)", ifindex);
+		NET_DUMP_UINT("ifindex", "(%d)", ifindex);
 		NET_DUMP_STR("kind", " %s", kind);
 		ret = do_bpf_filter_dump(tb[TCA_OPTIONS]);
 		NET_END_OBJECT_FINAL;