Message ID | 20241129231841.139239-1-pbonzini@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] Second batch of KVM changes for Linux 6.13 | expand |
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 15:18, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > This was acked on the mailing list by the RISC-V maintainer, see > https://patchew.org/linux/20240726084931.28924-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/ Please don't use random links. Maybe patchew will stay around. Maybe it won't. This is the first I ever see of it. It seems to be maintained by Red Hat, and yes, at least it contains the email message ID as part of the URL. But when I tried to go to patchew.org and then click on lkml.org, I get " https://patchew.org/lkml.org/" and a big "Not found" page. And when I clicked on "Linux", I get a working page, I can't even see the raw messages without downloading some "patch mbox". So "maintained" is perhaps too strong a word. Please use lore.kernel.org links instead. Maybe that won't stay around forever either, but at least it works. Lore also deals with a *lot* more lists, and has a lot more history. I tried to look up old stuff on patchew.org, and it just doesn't exist. Put another way: patchew is objectively *much* worse than lore. So don't try to make it a thing. Linus
The pull request you sent on Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:18:41 -0500:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git tags/for-linus
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/c4bb3a2d641c02ac2c7aa45534b4cefdf9bf416b
Thank you!
On 12/1/24 00:11, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 15:18, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> This was acked on the mailing list by the RISC-V maintainer, see >> https://patchew.org/linux/20240726084931.28924-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/ > > Please don't use random links. Maybe patchew will stay around. Maybe > it won't. This is the first I ever see of it. I'm not surprised. :) I'm going to launch into a full comparison of lore/patchwork/patchew---but the reason why I used patchew this time, is that I wanted to make sure that the one that was acked and included was the most recent submission for this series (see for example the top of https://patchew.org/linux/20240712083850.4242-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/, which was a previous version and has a link to the newest). > It seems to be maintained by Red Hat, and yes, at least it contains > the email message ID as part of the URL. > > But when I tried to go to patchew.org and then click on lkml.org, I > get " https://patchew.org/lkml.org/" and a big "Not found" page. > > And when I clicked on "Linux", I get a working page, I can't even see > the raw messages without downloading some "patch mbox". > > So "maintained" is perhaps too strong a word. Fair enough. :) I can certainly stick to lore links if you prefer that. Paolo
On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 15:21, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12/1/24 00:11, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 15:18, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> This was acked on the mailing list by the RISC-V maintainer, see > >> https://patchew.org/linux/20240726084931.28924-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/ > > > > Please don't use random links. Maybe patchew will stay around. Maybe > > it won't. This is the first I ever see of it. > > I'm not surprised. :) I'm going to launch into a full comparison of > lore/patchwork/patchew---but the reason why I used patchew this time, is > that I wanted to make sure that the one that was acked and included was > the most recent submission for this series Well, I can see the Ack from Palmer there on https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240726084931.28924-1-yongxuan.wang@sifive.com/ in the thread overview - or press "expand" there (either flat or nested) if you want to see the whole discussion rather than just the overview.. So it's not like the Ack wasn't visible there right on lore too... Linus