diff mbox series

arm64: dts: rockchip: Describe why is HWRNG disabled in RK356x base dtsi

Message ID 6b272e2f8f916c04b05db50df621659a5a7f29ab.1733149874.git.dsimic@manjaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series arm64: dts: rockchip: Describe why is HWRNG disabled in RK356x base dtsi | expand

Commit Message

Dragan Simic Dec. 2, 2024, 2:44 p.m. UTC
Despite the presence of the hardware random number generator (HWRNG) in the
different Rockchip RK356x SoC variants, it remains disabled for the RK3566
SoC because testing showed [1] that it produces unacceptably low quality of
random data, for some yet unknown reason.  The HWRNG is enabled for the RK3568
SoC, on which the testing showed good quality of the generated random data.

To avoid possible confusion in the future, [2] let's have this described
briefly in the RK356x base SoC dtsi.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/cover.1720969799.git.daniel@makrotopia.org/T/#u
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241201234613.52322-1-pbrobinson@gmail.com/T/#u

Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Dragan Simic Dec. 2, 2024, 2:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2024-12-02 15:44, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Despite the presence of the hardware random number generator (HWRNG) in 
> the
> different Rockchip RK356x SoC variants, it remains disabled for the 
> RK3566
> SoC because testing showed [1] that it produces unacceptably low 
> quality of
> random data, for some yet unknown reason.  The HWRNG is enabled for the 
> RK3568
> SoC, on which the testing showed good quality of the generated random 
> data.
> 
> To avoid possible confusion in the future, [2] let's have this 
> described
> briefly in the RK356x base SoC dtsi.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/cover.1720969799.git.daniel@makrotopia.org/T/#u
> [2] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241201234613.52322-1-pbrobinson@gmail.com/T/#u
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>

Oh, I forgot to Cc Peter as well while sending this patch, so I did
that now.  Sorry for the noise.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> index 62be06f3b863..ab8f42c0a843 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> @@ -1032,6 +1032,11 @@ sdhci: mmc@fe310000 {
>  		status = "disabled";
>  	};
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * Testing showed that the HWRNG found in RK3566 produces 
> unacceptably
> +	 * low quality of random data, so the HWRNG isn't enabled for all 
> RK356x
> +	 * SoC variants despite its presence.
> +	 */
>  	rng: rng@fe388000 {
>  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-rng";
>  		reg = <0x0 0xfe388000 0x0 0x4000>;
Diederik de Haas Dec. 2, 2024, 5:05 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

I'd have swapped 'is' and 'HWRNG' in the subject, but otherwise ...

On Mon Dec 2, 2024 at 3:44 PM CET, Dragan Simic wrote:
> Despite the presence of the hardware random number generator (HWRNG) in the
> different Rockchip RK356x SoC variants, it remains disabled for the RK3566
> SoC because testing showed [1] that it produces unacceptably low quality of
> random data, for some yet unknown reason.  The HWRNG is enabled for the RK3568
> SoC, on which the testing showed good quality of the generated random data.
>
> To avoid possible confusion in the future, [2] let's have this described
> briefly in the RK356x base SoC dtsi.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/cover.1720969799.git.daniel@makrotopia.org/T/#u
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241201234613.52322-1-pbrobinson@gmail.com/T/#u
>
> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> index 62be06f3b863..ab8f42c0a843 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
> @@ -1032,6 +1032,11 @@ sdhci: mmc@fe310000 {
>  		status = "disabled";
>  	};
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Testing showed that the HWRNG found in RK3566 produces unacceptably
> +	 * low quality of random data, so the HWRNG isn't enabled for all RK356x
> +	 * SoC variants despite its presence.
> +	 */
>  	rng: rng@fe388000 {
>  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-rng";
>  		reg = <0x0 0xfe388000 0x0 0x4000>;

Reviewed-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>

Thanks for this :-)
Dragan Simic Dec. 2, 2024, 6:33 p.m. UTC | #3
Hello Diederik,

On 2024-12-02 18:05, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> I'd have swapped 'is' and 'HWRNG' in the subject, but otherwise ...

Ah, I'd actually write it as "Describe why the HWRNG is disabled
in the RK356x base SoC dtsi", but that's way too long for a patch
summary, so I went with something shorter that also makes it sound
more like a question than a statement. :)

> On Mon Dec 2, 2024 at 3:44 PM CET, Dragan Simic wrote:
>> Despite the presence of the hardware random number generator (HWRNG) 
>> in the
>> different Rockchip RK356x SoC variants, it remains disabled for the 
>> RK3566
>> SoC because testing showed [1] that it produces unacceptably low 
>> quality of
>> random data, for some yet unknown reason.  The HWRNG is enabled for 
>> the RK3568
>> SoC, on which the testing showed good quality of the generated random 
>> data.
>> 
>> To avoid possible confusion in the future, [2] let's have this 
>> described
>> briefly in the RK356x base SoC dtsi.
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/cover.1720969799.git.daniel@makrotopia.org/T/#u
>> [2] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/20241201234613.52322-1-pbrobinson@gmail.com/T/#u
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
>> index 62be06f3b863..ab8f42c0a843 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
>> @@ -1032,6 +1032,11 @@ sdhci: mmc@fe310000 {
>>  		status = "disabled";
>>  	};
>> 
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Testing showed that the HWRNG found in RK3566 produces 
>> unacceptably
>> +	 * low quality of random data, so the HWRNG isn't enabled for all 
>> RK356x
>> +	 * SoC variants despite its presence.
>> +	 */
>>  	rng: rng@fe388000 {
>>  		compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-rng";
>>  		reg = <0x0 0xfe388000 0x0 0x4000>;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@cknow.org>
> 
> Thanks for this :-)

Thanks. :)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
index 62be06f3b863..ab8f42c0a843 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x-base.dtsi
@@ -1032,6 +1032,11 @@  sdhci: mmc@fe310000 {
 		status = "disabled";
 	};
 
+	/*
+	 * Testing showed that the HWRNG found in RK3566 produces unacceptably
+	 * low quality of random data, so the HWRNG isn't enabled for all RK356x
+	 * SoC variants despite its presence.
+	 */
 	rng: rng@fe388000 {
 		compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-rng";
 		reg = <0x0 0xfe388000 0x0 0x4000>;