diff mbox series

[v4,1/1] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: add watchdog DT node

Message ID 20241206025139.2148833-2-trunixs.kim@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [v4,1/1] arm64: dts: exynosautov920: add watchdog DT node | expand

Commit Message

김태완 Dec. 6, 2024, 2:51 a.m. UTC
From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>

Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>
---
 .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 6, 2024, 8:48 a.m. UTC | #1
On 06/12/2024 03:51, Taewan Kim wrote:
> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> 
> Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
> index c759134c909e..7b9591255e91 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
> @@ -183,6 +183,26 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10020000 {
>  				      "noc";
>  		};
>  
> +		watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {

You need to do careful rebase, not just accept whatever tools shown you.

This is now placed in incorrect order - not keeping sorting by unit address.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
김태완 Dec. 11, 2024, 1:50 a.m. UTC | #2
on 11/12/2024 01:50 UTC+09:00, Taewan Kim wrote:
>> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
>>
>> Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> index c759134c909e..7b9591255e91 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> @@ -183,6 +183,26 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10020000 {
>>  				      "noc";
>>  		};
>>
>> +		watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {
>
>You need to do careful rebase, not just accept whatever tools shown you.
>
>This is now placed in incorrect order - not keeping sorting by unit address.

I seems to me that the addresses are sorted correctly in order. 
Could you kindly check again?

        clock-controller@1002_0000
                  watchdog@1006_0000 
                  watchdog@1007_0000
    interrupt-controller@1040_0000

And if there are any rules I might not be aware of, please let me know.

Best regards,
Taewan Kim
Krzysztof Kozlowski Dec. 11, 2024, 7:50 a.m. UTC | #3
On 11/12/2024 02:50, 김태완 wrote:
> on 11/12/2024 01:50 UTC+09:00, Taewan Kim wrote:
>>> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>>> index c759134c909e..7b9591255e91 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>>> @@ -183,6 +183,26 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10020000 {
>>>  				      "noc";
>>>  		};
>>>
>>> +		watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {
>>
>> You need to do careful rebase, not just accept whatever tools shown you.
>>
>> This is now placed in incorrect order - not keeping sorting by unit address.
> 
> I seems to me that the addresses are sorted correctly in order. 
> Could you kindly check again?
> 
>         clock-controller@1002_0000
>                   watchdog@1006_0000 
>                   watchdog@1007_0000
>     interrupt-controller@1040_0000
> 
> And if there are any rules I might not be aware of, please let me know.


You are right, I got impression last was 1004, but that's 1040. Thanks
for correcting me. I applied now.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
index c759134c909e..7b9591255e91 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
@@ -183,6 +183,26 @@  cmu_misc: clock-controller@10020000 {
 				      "noc";
 		};
 
+		watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-wdt";
+			reg = <0x10060000 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 953 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&xtcxo>, <&xtcxo>;
+			clock-names = "watchdog", "watchdog_src";
+			samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_system_controller>;
+			samsung,cluster-index = <0>;
+		};
+
+		watchdog_cl1: watchdog@10070000 {
+			compatible = "samsung,exynosautov920-wdt";
+			reg = <0x10070000 0x100>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 952 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			clocks = <&xtcxo>, <&xtcxo>;
+			clock-names = "watchdog", "watchdog_src";
+			samsung,syscon-phandle = <&pmu_system_controller>;
+			samsung,cluster-index = <1>;
+		};
+
 		gic: interrupt-controller@10400000 {
 			compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
 			#interrupt-cells = <3>;