Message ID | 20250127-msm8226-modem-v3-4-67e968787eef@lucaweiss.eu (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Modem support for MSM8226 | expand |
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:45:36PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote: > For example MSM8974 has mx voltage rail exposed as regulator and only cx > voltage rail is exposed as power domain. This power domain (cx) is > attached internally in power domain and cannot be attached in this driver. > > Fixes: 8750cf392394 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Allow replacing regulators with power domains") > Co-developed-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> Reviewed-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > index e78bd986dc3f256effce4470222c0a5faeea86ec..0e1b0934ceedd13d5790b798afc95d68a8314c75 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > @@ -1831,6 +1831,13 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, > while (pd_names[num_pds]) > num_pds++; > > + /* Handle single power domain */ > + if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { > + devs[0] = dev; > + pm_runtime_enable(dev); > + return 1; > + } > + > for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) { > devs[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, pd_names[i]); > if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(devs[i])) { > @@ -1851,8 +1858,15 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, > static void q6v5_pds_detach(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct device **pds, > size_t pd_count) > { > + struct device *dev = qproc->dev; > int i; > > + /* Handle single power domain */ > + if (pd_count == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { > + pm_runtime_disable(dev); > + return; > + } > + > for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) > dev_pm_domain_detach(pds[i], false); > } > @@ -2449,13 +2463,13 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8974_mss = { > .supply = "pll", > .uA = 100000, > }, > - {} > - }, > - .fallback_proxy_supply = (struct qcom_mss_reg_res[]) { > { > .supply = "mx", > .uV = 1050000, > }, > + {} > + }, > + .fallback_proxy_supply = (struct qcom_mss_reg_res[]) { > { > .supply = "cx", > .uA = 100000, > > -- > 2.48.1 >
On 27.01.2025 11:45 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: > For example MSM8974 has mx voltage rail exposed as regulator and only cx > voltage rail is exposed as power domain. This power domain (cx) is > attached internally in power domain and cannot be attached in this driver. > > Fixes: 8750cf392394 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Allow replacing regulators with power domains") > Co-developed-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > index e78bd986dc3f256effce4470222c0a5faeea86ec..0e1b0934ceedd13d5790b798afc95d68a8314c75 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > @@ -1831,6 +1831,13 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, > while (pd_names[num_pds]) > num_pds++; > > + /* Handle single power domain */ > + if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { > + devs[0] = dev; > + pm_runtime_enable(dev); This call can fail Konrad
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 11:45:51AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 27.01.2025 11:45 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: > > For example MSM8974 has mx voltage rail exposed as regulator and only cx > > voltage rail is exposed as power domain. This power domain (cx) is > > attached internally in power domain and cannot be attached in this driver. > > > > Fixes: 8750cf392394 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Allow replacing regulators with power domains") > > Co-developed-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> > > --- > > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > > index e78bd986dc3f256effce4470222c0a5faeea86ec..0e1b0934ceedd13d5790b798afc95d68a8314c75 100644 > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c > > @@ -1831,6 +1831,13 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, > > while (pd_names[num_pds]) > > num_pds++; > > > > + /* Handle single power domain */ > > + if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { > > + devs[0] = dev; > > + pm_runtime_enable(dev); > > This call can fail > It returns void though? :D void pm_runtime_enable(struct device *dev); Stephan
On 28.01.2025 11:55 AM, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 11:45:51AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 27.01.2025 11:45 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> For example MSM8974 has mx voltage rail exposed as regulator and only cx >>> voltage rail is exposed as power domain. This power domain (cx) is >>> attached internally in power domain and cannot be attached in this driver. >>> >>> Fixes: 8750cf392394 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Allow replacing regulators with power domains") >>> Co-developed-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@gmail.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> >>> --- >>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >>> index e78bd986dc3f256effce4470222c0a5faeea86ec..0e1b0934ceedd13d5790b798afc95d68a8314c75 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c >>> @@ -1831,6 +1831,13 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, >>> while (pd_names[num_pds]) >>> num_pds++; >>> >>> + /* Handle single power domain */ >>> + if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { >>> + devs[0] = dev; >>> + pm_runtime_enable(dev); >> >> This call can fail >> > > It returns void though? :D > > void pm_runtime_enable(struct device *dev); *wipes glasses very hard* oh.. Konrad
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c index e78bd986dc3f256effce4470222c0a5faeea86ec..0e1b0934ceedd13d5790b798afc95d68a8314c75 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c @@ -1831,6 +1831,13 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, while (pd_names[num_pds]) num_pds++; + /* Handle single power domain */ + if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { + devs[0] = dev; + pm_runtime_enable(dev); + return 1; + } + for (i = 0; i < num_pds; i++) { devs[i] = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, pd_names[i]); if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(devs[i])) { @@ -1851,8 +1858,15 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs, static void q6v5_pds_detach(struct q6v5 *qproc, struct device **pds, size_t pd_count) { + struct device *dev = qproc->dev; int i; + /* Handle single power domain */ + if (pd_count == 1 && dev->pm_domain) { + pm_runtime_disable(dev); + return; + } + for (i = 0; i < pd_count; i++) dev_pm_domain_detach(pds[i], false); } @@ -2449,13 +2463,13 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res msm8974_mss = { .supply = "pll", .uA = 100000, }, - {} - }, - .fallback_proxy_supply = (struct qcom_mss_reg_res[]) { { .supply = "mx", .uV = 1050000, }, + {} + }, + .fallback_proxy_supply = (struct qcom_mss_reg_res[]) { { .supply = "cx", .uA = 100000,