Message ID | 20250128080751.3718762-1-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock | expand |
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 01:37:51PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for > the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new > server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() > which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A > sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due > to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is > ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server > request work due to deadlock on list lock. > > Process A Process B > > process_scheduled_works() > pdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work() > process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server() > pdr->locator_init_complete=true; > pdr_locator_work() > mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock); > > pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock); > > pdr_get_domain_list() > pr_err("PDR: %s get domain list > txn wait failed: %d\n", > req->service_name, > ret); > > Fix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration > is already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just > call schedule_work() here. > > Signed-off-by: Saranya R <quic_sarar@quicinc.com> > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com> Missing Fixes tag. > --- > drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) >
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 06:10:24PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 01:37:51PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > > When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for > > the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new > > server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() > > which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A > > sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due > > to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is > > ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server > > request work due to deadlock on list lock. > > > > Process A Process B > > > > process_scheduled_works() > > pdr_add_lookup() qmi_data_ready_work() > > process_scheduled_works() pdr_locator_new_server() > > pdr->locator_init_complete=true; > > pdr_locator_work() > > mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock); > > > > pdr_locate_service() mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock); > > > > pdr_get_domain_list() > > pr_err("PDR: %s get domain list > > txn wait failed: %d\n", > > req->service_name, > > ret); > > > > Fix it by removing the unnecessary list iteration as the list iteration > > is already being done inside locator work, so avoid it here and just > > call schedule_work() here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saranya R <quic_sarar@quicinc.com> > > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com> > > Missing Fixes tag. Sure, will add. -Mukesh > > > --- > > drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c | 8 +------- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c index 328b6153b2be..71be378d2e43 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static int pdr_locator_new_server(struct qmi_handle *qmi, { struct pdr_handle *pdr = container_of(qmi, struct pdr_handle, locator_hdl); - struct pdr_service *pds; mutex_lock(&pdr->lock); /* Create a local client port for QMI communication */ @@ -87,12 +86,7 @@ static int pdr_locator_new_server(struct qmi_handle *qmi, mutex_unlock(&pdr->lock); /* Service pending lookup requests */ - mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock); - list_for_each_entry(pds, &pdr->lookups, node) { - if (pds->need_locator_lookup) - schedule_work(&pdr->locator_work); - } - mutex_unlock(&pdr->list_lock); + schedule_work(&pdr->locator_work); return 0; }