[0/3] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add support for TJA1121 and errata

Message

Andrei Botila Feb. 27, 2025, 4 p.m. UTC

This patch series adds support for TJA1121 and two errata for latest
silicon version of TJA1120 and TJA1121.
Support for TJA1121 consists of naming changes since TJA1121 is based
on TJA1120 hardware with additional MACsec IP.

Andrei Botila (3):
  net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add support for TJA1121
  net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add TJA112X PHY configuration errata
  net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add TJA112XB SGMII PCS restart errata

 drivers/net/phy/Kconfig           |  2 +-
 drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Lunn Feb. 27, 2025, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #1

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 06:00:53PM +0200, Andrei Botila wrote:
> This patch series adds support for TJA1121 and two errata for latest
> silicon version of TJA1120 and TJA1121.

Should the errata fixes be back ported to stable for the TJA1120? If
so, you need to base them on net, and include a Fixes: tag. Adding the
new device is however net-next material.

	Andrew

Andrei Botila Feb. 27, 2025, 4:33 p.m. UTC | #2

On 2/27/2025 6:11 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 06:00:53PM +0200, Andrei Botila wrote:
>> This patch series adds support for TJA1121 and two errata for latest
>> silicon version of TJA1120 and TJA1121.
> 
> Should the errata fixes be back ported to stable for the TJA1120? If
> so, you need to base them on net, and include a Fixes: tag. Adding the
> new device is however net-next material.

The errata fixes don't have to be ported to stable. I've made a mistake 
by not putting 'net-next'. The entire patch series targets net-next.

Best regards,
Andrei

> 
> 	Andrew

Andrew Lunn Feb. 27, 2025, 4:58 p.m. UTC | #3

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 06:33:31PM +0200, Andrei Botila wrote:
> On 2/27/2025 6:11 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 06:00:53PM +0200, Andrei Botila wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for TJA1121 and two errata for latest
> > > silicon version of TJA1120 and TJA1121.
> > 
> > Should the errata fixes be back ported to stable for the TJA1120? If
> > so, you need to base them on net, and include a Fixes: tag. Adding the
> > new device is however net-next material.
> 
> The errata fixes don't have to be ported to stable.

An explanation why would be nice.

	Andrew