Message ID | 1343997486-710-2-git-send-email-sourav.poddar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hello. On 08/03/2012 04:38 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote: > Add I2C data node in omap5 device tree file. > Tested on omap5430 sdp. > Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi > index 57e5270..6b68dfe 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi > @@ -145,6 +145,41 @@ > #interrupt-cells = <1>; > }; > > + i2c1: i2c@48070000 { > + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + ti,hwmods = "i2c1"; Address postfix in the node name and no "reg" property? WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:22:19PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 08/03/2012 04:38 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote: > > > Add I2C data node in omap5 device tree file. > > > Tested on omap5430 sdp. > > > Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> > > Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi > > index 57e5270..6b68dfe 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi > > @@ -145,6 +145,41 @@ > > #interrupt-cells = <1>; > > }; > > > > + i2c1: i2c@48070000 { > > + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + ti,hwmods = "i2c1"; > > Address postfix in the node name and no "reg" property? that's because of the ti,hwmods attribute. OMAP is still not entirely converted to DT and there's this weird ti,hwmods attribute. OMAP's hwmod framework will fill up register addresses, irqs, etc when the device is created. Oh well...
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi index 57e5270..6b68dfe 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi @@ -145,6 +145,41 @@ #interrupt-cells = <1>; }; + i2c1: i2c@48070000 { + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + ti,hwmods = "i2c1"; + }; + + i2c2: i2c@48072000 { + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + ti,hwmods = "i2c2"; + }; + + i2c3: i2c@48060000 { + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + ti,hwmods = "i2c3"; + }; + + i2c4: i2c@4807A000 { + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + ti,hwmods = "i2c4"; + }; + + i2c5: i2c@4807C000 { + compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + ti,hwmods = "i2c5"; + }; + uart1: serial@4806a000 { compatible = "ti,omap4-uart"; ti,hwmods = "uart1";