| Message ID | 20120813203300.GA8891@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
On 08/13/2012 03:33 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:47:38PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/13/2012 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:42:21PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >>>> On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: >>>>> This patch series adds support for device tree based probing of >>>>> the PCIe controller found on Tegra SoCs. >>>> >>>> Thierry, I just tested all Tegra boards in v3.6-rc1, and noticed >>>> that PCIe doesn't work on TrimSlice when booting use device tree. >>>> I think I found the cause, and I can't see why the same problem >>>> doesn't affect this series. Perhaps you can enlighten me? >> ... >>>> PCI: Device 0000:01:00.0 not available because of resource >>>> collisions >> ... >>> I've looked into this a bit, and it seems like ARM is using an >>> open- coded version of the pci_enable_resources() function here, >>> with the only difference being the unconditional enabling of both >>> I/O and memory- mapped access for bridges. On Tegra there is >>> already a PCI fixup to do this, so pci_enable_resources() can be >>> used as-is. I came up with the attached patch but haven't been able >>> to test it yet. >> >> Thanks very much for looking into this. >> >> The patch did alter the behavior a little for TrimSlice, but didn't >> solve the problem. The old error messages: >> >>> [ 2.173971] PCI: Device 0000:01:00.0 not available because of resource collisions >>> [ 2.181453] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): enable failure >>> [ 2.188254] r8169: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -22 >> >> Were replaced with the following with your patch: >> >>> [ 2.174010] r8169 0000:01:00.0: device not available (can't reserve [io 0x0000-0x00ff]) >>> [ 2.182098] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): enable failure >>> [ 2.188900] r8169: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -22 >> >> This message appears from drivers/pci/setup-res.c pci_enable_resources() >> due to: >> >>> if (!r->parent) { >>> dev_err(&dev->dev, "device not available " >>> "(can't reserve %pR)\n", r); >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } > > Looking at the code some more, this may be caused by the pci_remap_io() > patch series, so you might want to revert that patch and see if it fixes > the I/O resources. > Humm... But this patch deals with the i/o space and it is failing below on the memory space. >> That check doesn't appear in ARM's custom pcibios_enable_device(). >> Disabling that check yields: >> >>> [ 2.174192] r8169 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0143) >>> [ 2.180041] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: can't reserve [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.188386] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): could not request regions >>> [ 2.196140] r8169: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -16 >> >> I think that's because the pci_dev's resources are initially assigned >> PCI-aperture-relative addresses, and then these are later patched up to >> take account of where the aperture is mapped into the CPU's address space. >> >> Boot log using board files: >> >>> [ 1.146145] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 10: [io 0x0000-0x00ff] >>> [ 1.151745] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 1.159007] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 20: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 1.166270] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 30: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff pref] >> ... >>> [ 1.217829] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xa0000000-0xa001ffff pref] >>> [ 1.225264] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0xa0020000-0xa0023fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 1.233236] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xa0024000-0xa0024fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 1.241206] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [io 0x1000-0x10ff] >> ... (I added some extra printks:) >>> [ 1.488007] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: requesting [io 0x1000-0x10ff] >>> [ 1.501483] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: requesting [mem 0xa0024000-0xa0024fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 1.516611] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: requesting [mem 0xa0020000-0xa0023fff 64bit pref] >> >> whereas for a device tree boot: >> >> (same): >>> [ 2.112217] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 10: [io 0x0000-0x00ff] >>> [ 2.117635] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.124690] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 20: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.131731] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 30: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff pref] >> ... (request region happens early) >>> [ 2.179838] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: requesting [io 0x0000-0x00ff] >>> [ 2.193312] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: requesting [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.201397] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: can't reserve [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.209742] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): could not request regions >> ... (same, just happens too late) >>> [ 2.236818] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xa0000000-0xa001ffff pref] >>> [ 2.244027] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0xa0020000-0xa0023fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.251794] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xa0024000-0xa0024fff 64bit pref] >>> [ 2.259542] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [io 0x1000-0x10ff] >> >> I suspect this is all still related to the PCI devices themselves being >> probed much earlier in the overall PCI initialization sequence when the >> PCI controller is probed later in the boot sequence, whereas PCI device >> probe is deferred until the overall PCI initialization sequence is >> complete if the PCI controller is probed very early in the boot sequence. >> >> Does anyone know where/what that "probe now" vs. "probe later" decision >> point is? I'll try and track it down if nobody beats me to it. > > There's the io_offset and mem_offset fields that I've completely ignored > up to now. Can you try the patch below to see if it changes anything? > I'm sorry but I can't test any of this myself right now. Arnd and I discussed io_offset some. I don't think either of us can figure out when it should be anything but 0 at least if pci i/o bus addresses start at 0. I don't think mem_offset is the issue. I think perhaps you need to set pcibios_min_mem to the memory window base (0xa0000000), but that's just a guess. Rob > > Thierry > > > > _______________________________________________ > devicetree-discuss mailing list > devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 04:38:45PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 08/13/2012 03:33 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:47:38PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 08/13/2012 11:40 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:42:21PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>>> On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >>>>> This patch series adds support for device tree based probing of > >>>>> the PCIe controller found on Tegra SoCs. > >>>> > >>>> Thierry, I just tested all Tegra boards in v3.6-rc1, and noticed > >>>> that PCIe doesn't work on TrimSlice when booting use device tree. > >>>> I think I found the cause, and I can't see why the same problem > >>>> doesn't affect this series. Perhaps you can enlighten me? > >> ... > >>>> PCI: Device 0000:01:00.0 not available because of resource > >>>> collisions > >> ... > >>> I've looked into this a bit, and it seems like ARM is using an > >>> open- coded version of the pci_enable_resources() function here, > >>> with the only difference being the unconditional enabling of both > >>> I/O and memory- mapped access for bridges. On Tegra there is > >>> already a PCI fixup to do this, so pci_enable_resources() can be > >>> used as-is. I came up with the attached patch but haven't been able > >>> to test it yet. > >> > >> Thanks very much for looking into this. > >> > >> The patch did alter the behavior a little for TrimSlice, but didn't > >> solve the problem. The old error messages: > >> > >>> [ 2.173971] PCI: Device 0000:01:00.0 not available because of resource collisions > >>> [ 2.181453] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): enable failure > >>> [ 2.188254] r8169: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -22 > >> > >> Were replaced with the following with your patch: > >> > >>> [ 2.174010] r8169 0000:01:00.0: device not available (can't reserve [io 0x0000-0x00ff]) > >>> [ 2.182098] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): enable failure > >>> [ 2.188900] r8169: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -22 > >> > >> This message appears from drivers/pci/setup-res.c pci_enable_resources() > >> due to: > >> > >>> if (!r->parent) { > >>> dev_err(&dev->dev, "device not available " > >>> "(can't reserve %pR)\n", r); > >>> return -EINVAL; > >>> } > > > > Looking at the code some more, this may be caused by the pci_remap_io() > > patch series, so you might want to revert that patch and see if it fixes > > the I/O resources. > > > > Humm... But this patch deals with the i/o space and it is failing below > on the memory space. But above it also fails for I/O. Looking at this some more, it seems like your patch isn't at fault. Rather there seems to be a general resource assignment problem. > > >> That check doesn't appear in ARM's custom pcibios_enable_device(). > >> Disabling that check yields: > >> > >>> [ 2.174192] r8169 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0143) > >>> [ 2.180041] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: can't reserve [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.188386] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): could not request regions > >>> [ 2.196140] r8169: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -16 > >> > >> I think that's because the pci_dev's resources are initially assigned > >> PCI-aperture-relative addresses, and then these are later patched up to > >> take account of where the aperture is mapped into the CPU's address space. > >> > >> Boot log using board files: > >> > >>> [ 1.146145] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 10: [io 0x0000-0x00ff] > >>> [ 1.151745] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 1.159007] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 20: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 1.166270] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 30: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff pref] > >> ... > >>> [ 1.217829] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xa0000000-0xa001ffff pref] > >>> [ 1.225264] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0xa0020000-0xa0023fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 1.233236] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xa0024000-0xa0024fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 1.241206] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [io 0x1000-0x10ff] > >> ... (I added some extra printks:) > >>> [ 1.488007] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: requesting [io 0x1000-0x10ff] > >>> [ 1.501483] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: requesting [mem 0xa0024000-0xa0024fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 1.516611] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: requesting [mem 0xa0020000-0xa0023fff 64bit pref] > >> > >> whereas for a device tree boot: > >> > >> (same): > >>> [ 2.112217] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 10: [io 0x0000-0x00ff] > >>> [ 2.117635] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 18: [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.124690] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 20: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.131731] pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 30: [mem 0x00000000-0x0001ffff pref] > >> ... (request region happens early) > >>> [ 2.179838] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: requesting [io 0x0000-0x00ff] > >>> [ 2.193312] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: requesting [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.201397] r8169 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: can't reserve [mem 0x00000000-0x00000fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.209742] r8169 0000:01:00.0: (unregistered net_device): could not request regions > >> ... (same, just happens too late) > >>> [ 2.236818] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0xa0000000-0xa001ffff pref] > >>> [ 2.244027] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 4: assigned [mem 0xa0020000-0xa0023fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.251794] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 2: assigned [mem 0xa0024000-0xa0024fff 64bit pref] > >>> [ 2.259542] pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [io 0x1000-0x10ff] > >> > >> I suspect this is all still related to the PCI devices themselves being > >> probed much earlier in the overall PCI initialization sequence when the > >> PCI controller is probed later in the boot sequence, whereas PCI device > >> probe is deferred until the overall PCI initialization sequence is > >> complete if the PCI controller is probed very early in the boot sequence. > >> > >> Does anyone know where/what that "probe now" vs. "probe later" decision > >> point is? I'll try and track it down if nobody beats me to it. > > > > There's the io_offset and mem_offset fields that I've completely ignored > > up to now. Can you try the patch below to see if it changes anything? > > I'm sorry but I can't test any of this myself right now. > > Arnd and I discussed io_offset some. I don't think either of us can > figure out when it should be anything but 0 at least if pci i/o bus > addresses start at 0. > > I don't think mem_offset is the issue. I think perhaps you need to set > pcibios_min_mem to the memory window base (0xa0000000), but that's just > a guess. I'm having trouble understanding how that's supposed to work for regions of prefetchable memory. At least on Tegra these can arbitrarily assigned and I thought I had seen other platforms where this was also the case. However the pcibios_min_mem (or the equivalent macro PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM) is used while assigning the resources in the __pci_assign_resources() in drivers/pci/setup-res.c, so it may influence things. But I think the more fundamental issue here is that BARs are assigned properly, only they are assigned too late in the DT case as opposed to the board files case. I don't understand why that happens. Thierry
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c index 3463fb5..9b9b3e0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pcie.c @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys) pp->res[0].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM; if (request_resource(&iomem_resource, &pp->res[0])) panic("Request PCIe Memory resource failed\n"); - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->res[0], sys->mem_offset); + pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->res[0], pp->res[0].start); /* * IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys) pp->res[1].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH; if (request_resource(&iomem_resource, &pp->res[1])) panic("Request PCIe Prefetch Memory resource failed\n"); - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->res[1], sys->mem_offset); + pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->res[1], pp->res[1].start); return 1; }