Message ID | 1346456995-21572-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > Old platforms using ancient gettimeoffset() and other arcane > APIs are standing in the way of cleaning up the ARM kernel. > > This is an attempt at blind-coding a generic time and clocksource > driver for the platform by way of a datasheet and looking at the > old code, it'd be great if someone who is actually using this > machine could test it. > > If noone volunteers to do this I will instead propose a patch > deleting the machine altogether. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Corrected the mask when setting clockevents from & TMCON_T1EN > to & ~TMCON_T1EN so it doesn't shut down the clock source. BTW: Greg if this would happen to work - could you try to enable CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT and CONFIG_NO_HZ as well to see if we can work fine in oneshot mode as well? Yours, Linus Walleij
On 09/01/2012 10:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >> Old platforms using ancient gettimeoffset() and other arcane >> APIs are standing in the way of cleaning up the ARM kernel. >> >> This is an attempt at blind-coding a generic time and clocksource >> driver for the platform by way of a datasheet and looking at the >> old code, it'd be great if someone who is actually using this >> machine could test it. >> >> If noone volunteers to do this I will instead propose a patch >> deleting the machine altogether. >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> --- >> ChangeLog v1->v2: >> - Corrected the mask when setting clockevents from & TMCON_T1EN >> to & ~TMCON_T1EN so it doesn't shut down the clock source. > > BTW: Greg if this would happen to work - could you try to enable > CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT and CONFIG_NO_HZ as well to see > if we can work fine in oneshot mode as well? Will do. Let you know how it goes. Regards Greg
Hi Linus, On 01/09/12 09:49, Linus Walleij wrote: > Old platforms using ancient gettimeoffset() and other arcane > APIs are standing in the way of cleaning up the ARM kernel. > > This is an attempt at blind-coding a generic time and clocksource > driver for the platform by way of a datasheet and looking at the > old code, it'd be great if someone who is actually using this > machine could test it. > > If noone volunteers to do this I will instead propose a patch > deleting the machine altogether. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Corrected the mask when setting clockevents from & TMCON_T1EN > to & ~TMCON_T1EN so it doesn't shut down the clock source. Same result, still doesn't count time. If I have a few minutes today I'll see if I can debug any. Regards Greg > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 6d6e18f..e9ce038 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -652,8 +652,9 @@ config ARCH_KS8695 > bool "Micrel/Kendin KS8695" > select CPU_ARM922T > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB > - select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET > select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H > + select CLKSRC_MMIO > + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS > help > Support for Micrel/Kendin KS8695 "Centaur" (ARM922T) based > System-on-Chip devices. > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c > index 6974c23..1ba0182 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > #include <linux/kernel.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/clockchips.h> > +#include <linux/clocksource.h> > > #include <asm/mach/time.h> > #include <asm/system_misc.h> > @@ -53,44 +55,68 @@ > /* Timer0 Timeout Counter Register */ > #define T0TC_WATCHDOG (0xff) /* Enable watchdog mode */ > > -/* > - * Returns number of ms since last clock interrupt. Note that interrupts > - * will have been disabled by do_gettimeoffset() > - */ > -static unsigned long ks8695_gettimeoffset (void) > +static void ks8695_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, > + struct clock_event_device *evt) > { > - unsigned long elapsed, tick2, intpending; > + if (mode == CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC) { > + u32 rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, HZ); > + u32 half = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate, 2); > + u32 tmcon; > + > + /* Disable timer 1 */ > + tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; > + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + > + /* Both registers need to count down */ > + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); > + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); > + > + /* Re-enable timer1 */ > + tmcon |= TMCON_T1EN; > + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + } > +} > > - /* > - * Get the current number of ticks. Note that there is a race > - * condition between us reading the timer and checking for an > - * interrupt. We solve this by ensuring that the counter has not > - * reloaded between our two reads. > - */ > - elapsed = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); > - do { > - tick2 = elapsed; > - intpending = readl_relaxed(KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTST) & (1 << KS8695_IRQ_TIMER1); > - elapsed = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); > - } while (elapsed > tick2); > - > - /* Convert to number of ticks expired (not remaining) */ > - elapsed = (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ) - elapsed; > - > - /* Is interrupt pending? If so, then timer has been reloaded already. */ > - if (intpending) > - elapsed += (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ); > - > - /* Convert ticks to usecs */ > - return (unsigned long)(elapsed * (tick_nsec / 1000)) / LATCH; > +static int ks8695_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles, > + struct clock_event_device *evt) > + > +{ > + u32 half = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cycles, 2); > + u32 tmcon; > + > + /* Disable timer 1 */ > + tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; > + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + > + /* Both registers need to count down */ > + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); > + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); > + > + /* Re-enable timer1 */ > + tmcon |= TMCON_T1EN; > + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + > + return 0; > } > > +static struct clock_event_device clockevent_ks8695 = { > + .name = "ks8695_t1tc", > + .rating = 300, /* Reasonably fast and accurate clock event */ > + .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC, > + .set_next_event = ks8695_set_next_event, > + .set_mode = ks8695_set_mode, > +}; > + > /* > * IRQ handler for the timer. > */ > static irqreturn_t ks8695_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) > { > - timer_tick(); > + struct clock_event_device *evt = &clockevent_ks8695; > + > + evt->event_handler(evt); > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > @@ -102,18 +128,42 @@ static struct irqaction ks8695_timer_irq = { > > static void ks8695_timer_setup(void) > { > - unsigned long tmout = CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ; > unsigned long tmcon; > > - /* disable timer1 */ > + /* Disable timer 0 and 1 */ > tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > - writel_relaxed(tmcon & ~TMCON_T1EN, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T0EN; > + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; > + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > > - writel_relaxed(tmout / 2, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); > - writel_relaxed(tmout / 2, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); > + /* > + * Set up timer 0 to loop indefinately, count 32 bits with TOUT0 > + * set to zero, then 1 bit with TOUT0 set to 1. The reason we are doing > + * this is that it's not allowed to set either register to 0, then the > + * behaviour is "unpredictable". This injects a faulty pulse every > + * 2^32-1 cycles but we can surely live with that rather than > + * complicating the code. > + */ > + writel_relaxed(0xFFFFFFFFU, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0TC); > + writel_relaxed(1, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0PD); > + /* Start timer 0 */ > + tmcon |= TMCON_T0EN; > + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + /* Use timer 0 as clocksource */ > + if (clocksource_mmio_init((void *) KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0TC, > + "ks8695_t0tc", KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, 300, 32, > + clocksource_mmio_readl_up)) > + pr_err("timer: failed to initialize KS8695 clock source\n"); > > - /* re-enable timer1 */ > - writel_relaxed(tmcon | TMCON_T1EN, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); > + /* > + * Use timer 1 to fire IRQs on the timeline, only support one-shot > + * mode and the system will take care of the rest. Minimum 2 cycles > + * (one on each counter) maximum 2*2^32, but the API will only > + * accept up to a 32bit full word (0xFFFFFFFFU). > + */ > + clockevents_config_and_register(&clockevent_ks8695, > + KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, 2, > + 0xFFFFFFFFU); > } > > static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void) > @@ -126,7 +176,6 @@ static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void) > > struct sys_timer ks8695_timer = { > .init = ks8695_timer_init, > - .offset = ks8695_gettimeoffset, > }; > > void ks8695_restart(char mode, const char *cmd) >
On 03/09/12 11:12, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 01/09/12 09:49, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Old platforms using ancient gettimeoffset() and other arcane >> APIs are standing in the way of cleaning up the ARM kernel. >> >> This is an attempt at blind-coding a generic time and clocksource >> driver for the platform by way of a datasheet and looking at the >> old code, it'd be great if someone who is actually using this >> machine could test it. >> >> If noone volunteers to do this I will instead propose a patch >> deleting the machine altogether. >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> --- >> ChangeLog v1->v2: >> - Corrected the mask when setting clockevents from & TMCON_T1EN >> to & ~TMCON_T1EN so it doesn't shut down the clock source. > > Same result, still doesn't count time. If I have a few minutes today > I'll see if I can debug any. The timer interrupt itself seems to be coming at about the correct rate (given CONFIG_HZ=100): # cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 7: 12036 - ks8695_tick [WAIT 10 seconds] # cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 7: 13032 - ks8695_tick Regards Greg >> --- >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 +- >> arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index 6d6e18f..e9ce038 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -652,8 +652,9 @@ config ARCH_KS8695 >> bool "Micrel/Kendin KS8695" >> select CPU_ARM922T >> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB >> - select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET >> select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H >> + select CLKSRC_MMIO >> + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS >> help >> Support for Micrel/Kendin KS8695 "Centaur" (ARM922T) based >> System-on-Chip devices. >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c >> index 6974c23..1ba0182 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ >> #include <linux/kernel.h> >> #include <linux/sched.h> >> #include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/clockchips.h> >> +#include <linux/clocksource.h> >> >> #include <asm/mach/time.h> >> #include <asm/system_misc.h> >> @@ -53,44 +55,68 @@ >> /* Timer0 Timeout Counter Register */ >> #define T0TC_WATCHDOG (0xff) /* Enable watchdog mode */ >> >> -/* >> - * Returns number of ms since last clock interrupt. Note that interrupts >> - * will have been disabled by do_gettimeoffset() >> - */ >> -static unsigned long ks8695_gettimeoffset (void) >> +static void ks8695_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, >> + struct clock_event_device *evt) >> { >> - unsigned long elapsed, tick2, intpending; >> + if (mode == CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC) { >> + u32 rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, HZ); >> + u32 half = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate, 2); >> + u32 tmcon; >> + >> + /* Disable timer 1 */ >> + tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; >> + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + >> + /* Both registers need to count down */ >> + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); >> + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); >> + >> + /* Re-enable timer1 */ >> + tmcon |= TMCON_T1EN; >> + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + } >> +} >> >> - /* >> - * Get the current number of ticks. Note that there is a race >> - * condition between us reading the timer and checking for an >> - * interrupt. We solve this by ensuring that the counter has not >> - * reloaded between our two reads. >> - */ >> - elapsed = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); >> - do { >> - tick2 = elapsed; >> - intpending = readl_relaxed(KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTST) & (1 << KS8695_IRQ_TIMER1); >> - elapsed = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); >> - } while (elapsed > tick2); >> - >> - /* Convert to number of ticks expired (not remaining) */ >> - elapsed = (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ) - elapsed; >> - >> - /* Is interrupt pending? If so, then timer has been reloaded already. */ >> - if (intpending) >> - elapsed += (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ); >> - >> - /* Convert ticks to usecs */ >> - return (unsigned long)(elapsed * (tick_nsec / 1000)) / LATCH; >> +static int ks8695_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles, >> + struct clock_event_device *evt) >> + >> +{ >> + u32 half = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cycles, 2); >> + u32 tmcon; >> + >> + /* Disable timer 1 */ >> + tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; >> + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + >> + /* Both registers need to count down */ >> + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); >> + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); >> + >> + /* Re-enable timer1 */ >> + tmcon |= TMCON_T1EN; >> + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + >> + return 0; >> } >> >> +static struct clock_event_device clockevent_ks8695 = { >> + .name = "ks8695_t1tc", >> + .rating = 300, /* Reasonably fast and accurate clock event */ >> + .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC, >> + .set_next_event = ks8695_set_next_event, >> + .set_mode = ks8695_set_mode, >> +}; >> + >> /* >> * IRQ handler for the timer. >> */ >> static irqreturn_t ks8695_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) >> { >> - timer_tick(); >> + struct clock_event_device *evt = &clockevent_ks8695; >> + >> + evt->event_handler(evt); >> return IRQ_HANDLED; >> } >> >> @@ -102,18 +128,42 @@ static struct irqaction ks8695_timer_irq = { >> >> static void ks8695_timer_setup(void) >> { >> - unsigned long tmout = CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ; >> unsigned long tmcon; >> >> - /* disable timer1 */ >> + /* Disable timer 0 and 1 */ >> tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> - writel_relaxed(tmcon & ~TMCON_T1EN, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T0EN; >> + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; >> + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> >> - writel_relaxed(tmout / 2, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); >> - writel_relaxed(tmout / 2, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); >> + /* >> + * Set up timer 0 to loop indefinately, count 32 bits with TOUT0 >> + * set to zero, then 1 bit with TOUT0 set to 1. The reason we are doing >> + * this is that it's not allowed to set either register to 0, then the >> + * behaviour is "unpredictable". This injects a faulty pulse every >> + * 2^32-1 cycles but we can surely live with that rather than >> + * complicating the code. >> + */ >> + writel_relaxed(0xFFFFFFFFU, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0TC); >> + writel_relaxed(1, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0PD); >> + /* Start timer 0 */ >> + tmcon |= TMCON_T0EN; >> + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + /* Use timer 0 as clocksource */ >> + if (clocksource_mmio_init((void *) KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0TC, >> + "ks8695_t0tc", KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, 300, 32, >> + clocksource_mmio_readl_up)) >> + pr_err("timer: failed to initialize KS8695 clock source\n"); >> >> - /* re-enable timer1 */ >> - writel_relaxed(tmcon | TMCON_T1EN, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); >> + /* >> + * Use timer 1 to fire IRQs on the timeline, only support one-shot >> + * mode and the system will take care of the rest. Minimum 2 cycles >> + * (one on each counter) maximum 2*2^32, but the API will only >> + * accept up to a 32bit full word (0xFFFFFFFFU). >> + */ >> + clockevents_config_and_register(&clockevent_ks8695, >> + KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, 2, >> + 0xFFFFFFFFU); >> } >> >> static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void) >> @@ -126,7 +176,6 @@ static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void) >> >> struct sys_timer ks8695_timer = { >> .init = ks8695_timer_init, >> - .offset = ks8695_gettimeoffset, >> }; >> >> void ks8695_restart(char mode, const char *cmd) >> > >
Hi Linus, On 09/01/2012 10:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Old platforms using ancient gettimeoffset() and other arcane >> APIs are standing in the way of cleaning up the ARM kernel. >> >> This is an attempt at blind-coding a generic time and clocksource >> driver for the platform by way of a datasheet and looking at the >> old code, it'd be great if someone who is actually using this >> machine could test it. >> >> If noone volunteers to do this I will instead propose a patch >> deleting the machine altogether. >> >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> --- >> ChangeLog v1->v2: >> - Corrected the mask when setting clockevents from & TMCON_T1EN >> to & ~TMCON_T1EN so it doesn't shut down the clock source. > > BTW: Greg if this would happen to work - could you try to enable > CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT and CONFIG_NO_HZ as well to see > if we can work fine in oneshot mode as well? It worked in oneshot mode, if I removed the clocksource init code. So that looks good too. Regards Greg
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 6d6e18f..e9ce038 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -652,8 +652,9 @@ config ARCH_KS8695 bool "Micrel/Kendin KS8695" select CPU_ARM922T select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB - select ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET select NEED_MACH_MEMORY_H + select CLKSRC_MMIO + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS help Support for Micrel/Kendin KS8695 "Centaur" (ARM922T) based System-on-Chip devices. diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c index 6974c23..1ba0182 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/clockchips.h> +#include <linux/clocksource.h> #include <asm/mach/time.h> #include <asm/system_misc.h> @@ -53,44 +55,68 @@ /* Timer0 Timeout Counter Register */ #define T0TC_WATCHDOG (0xff) /* Enable watchdog mode */ -/* - * Returns number of ms since last clock interrupt. Note that interrupts - * will have been disabled by do_gettimeoffset() - */ -static unsigned long ks8695_gettimeoffset (void) +static void ks8695_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode, + struct clock_event_device *evt) { - unsigned long elapsed, tick2, intpending; + if (mode == CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC) { + u32 rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, HZ); + u32 half = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate, 2); + u32 tmcon; + + /* Disable timer 1 */ + tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + + /* Both registers need to count down */ + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); + + /* Re-enable timer1 */ + tmcon |= TMCON_T1EN; + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + } +} - /* - * Get the current number of ticks. Note that there is a race - * condition between us reading the timer and checking for an - * interrupt. We solve this by ensuring that the counter has not - * reloaded between our two reads. - */ - elapsed = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); - do { - tick2 = elapsed; - intpending = readl_relaxed(KS8695_IRQ_VA + KS8695_INTST) & (1 << KS8695_IRQ_TIMER1); - elapsed = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC) + readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); - } while (elapsed > tick2); - - /* Convert to number of ticks expired (not remaining) */ - elapsed = (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ) - elapsed; - - /* Is interrupt pending? If so, then timer has been reloaded already. */ - if (intpending) - elapsed += (CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ); - - /* Convert ticks to usecs */ - return (unsigned long)(elapsed * (tick_nsec / 1000)) / LATCH; +static int ks8695_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles, + struct clock_event_device *evt) + +{ + u32 half = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cycles, 2); + u32 tmcon; + + /* Disable timer 1 */ + tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + + /* Both registers need to count down */ + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); + writel_relaxed(half, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); + + /* Re-enable timer1 */ + tmcon |= TMCON_T1EN; + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + + return 0; } +static struct clock_event_device clockevent_ks8695 = { + .name = "ks8695_t1tc", + .rating = 300, /* Reasonably fast and accurate clock event */ + .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC, + .set_next_event = ks8695_set_next_event, + .set_mode = ks8695_set_mode, +}; + /* * IRQ handler for the timer. */ static irqreturn_t ks8695_timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) { - timer_tick(); + struct clock_event_device *evt = &clockevent_ks8695; + + evt->event_handler(evt); return IRQ_HANDLED; } @@ -102,18 +128,42 @@ static struct irqaction ks8695_timer_irq = { static void ks8695_timer_setup(void) { - unsigned long tmout = CLOCK_TICK_RATE / HZ; unsigned long tmcon; - /* disable timer1 */ + /* Disable timer 0 and 1 */ tmcon = readl_relaxed(KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); - writel_relaxed(tmcon & ~TMCON_T1EN, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T0EN; + tmcon &= ~TMCON_T1EN; + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); - writel_relaxed(tmout / 2, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1TC); - writel_relaxed(tmout / 2, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T1PD); + /* + * Set up timer 0 to loop indefinately, count 32 bits with TOUT0 + * set to zero, then 1 bit with TOUT0 set to 1. The reason we are doing + * this is that it's not allowed to set either register to 0, then the + * behaviour is "unpredictable". This injects a faulty pulse every + * 2^32-1 cycles but we can surely live with that rather than + * complicating the code. + */ + writel_relaxed(0xFFFFFFFFU, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0TC); + writel_relaxed(1, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0PD); + /* Start timer 0 */ + tmcon |= TMCON_T0EN; + writel_relaxed(tmcon, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + /* Use timer 0 as clocksource */ + if (clocksource_mmio_init((void *) KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_T0TC, + "ks8695_t0tc", KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, 300, 32, + clocksource_mmio_readl_up)) + pr_err("timer: failed to initialize KS8695 clock source\n"); - /* re-enable timer1 */ - writel_relaxed(tmcon | TMCON_T1EN, KS8695_TMR_VA + KS8695_TMCON); + /* + * Use timer 1 to fire IRQs on the timeline, only support one-shot + * mode and the system will take care of the rest. Minimum 2 cycles + * (one on each counter) maximum 2*2^32, but the API will only + * accept up to a 32bit full word (0xFFFFFFFFU). + */ + clockevents_config_and_register(&clockevent_ks8695, + KS8695_CLOCK_RATE, 2, + 0xFFFFFFFFU); } static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void) @@ -126,7 +176,6 @@ static void __init ks8695_timer_init (void) struct sys_timer ks8695_timer = { .init = ks8695_timer_init, - .offset = ks8695_gettimeoffset, }; void ks8695_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
Old platforms using ancient gettimeoffset() and other arcane APIs are standing in the way of cleaning up the ARM kernel. This is an attempt at blind-coding a generic time and clocksource driver for the platform by way of a datasheet and looking at the old code, it'd be great if someone who is actually using this machine could test it. If noone volunteers to do this I will instead propose a patch deleting the machine altogether. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- ChangeLog v1->v2: - Corrected the mask when setting clockevents from & TMCON_T1EN to & ~TMCON_T1EN so it doesn't shut down the clock source. --- arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 +- arch/arm/mach-ks8695/time.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)