Message ID | 5048457E.6050002@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:41:02PM +0800, Wang Sheng-Hui wrote: > The memory allocation failure is BUG_ON in add_excluded_extent > (following the code path). No need to BUG_ON -ENOMEM inside > btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent. This indirectly calls __set_extent_bit that does BUG_ON on memory allocation failures. This type of error condition is hard to fix, as it usually needs to do non-trivial cleanups in the function before returning -ENOMEM, so the easiset way to "handle" it is to do BUG_ON and then separately deal with it in another patch (so it does not mix with the original patch). Your patches remove (from my POV) useful marks that we have an error condition to handle, not to hide it. So, NAK from me for anything that looks like this. I'm of course glad to look at patches that replace the BUG_ON with proper error handling :) david > > Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 ++---- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index 95492cc..9b9a6fa 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -6207,8 +6207,7 @@ int btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); > > if (start >= caching_ctl->progress) { > - ret = add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); > - BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */ > + add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); > } else if (start + num_bytes <= caching_ctl->progress) { > ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(block_group, > start, num_bytes); > @@ -6222,8 +6221,7 @@ int btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > start = caching_ctl->progress; > num_bytes = ins->objectid + ins->offset - > caching_ctl->progress; > - ret = add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); > - BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */ > + add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); > } > > mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 95492cc..9b9a6fa 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -6207,8 +6207,7 @@ int btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); if (start >= caching_ctl->progress) { - ret = add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); - BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */ + add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); } else if (start + num_bytes <= caching_ctl->progress) { ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(block_group, start, num_bytes); @@ -6222,8 +6221,7 @@ int btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, start = caching_ctl->progress; num_bytes = ins->objectid + ins->offset - caching_ctl->progress; - ret = add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); - BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM */ + add_excluded_extent(root, start, num_bytes); } mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
The memory allocation failure is BUG_ON in add_excluded_extent (following the code path). No need to BUG_ON -ENOMEM inside btrfs_alloc_logged_file_extent. Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)