Message ID | CADysL2YwpyuhgzwF6djObZQTpgdHCsLp=K7NsCJth6wAXuFV=A@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:50:24AM +0530, Gupta, Ramesh wrote: > static void flush_iopgd_range(u32 *first, u32 *last) > { > - /* FIXME: L2 cache should be taken care of if it exists */ > - do { > - asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 1 @ flush_pgd" > - : : "r" (first)); > - first += L1_CACHE_BYTES / sizeof(*first); > - } while (first <= last); > + flush_iommu_mem(first, last); > + outer_flush_range(virt_to_phys(first), virt_to_phys(last)); I think this would be safer if these operated on an area rather than a range - which means taking a start plus size. phys_addr_t phys = virt_to_phys(start); iommu_flush_area(start, size); outer_flush_range(phys, phys + size); is safer than the above if virt_to_phys() is non-linear. > *iopgd = virt_to_phys(iopte) | IOPGD_TABLE; > - flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd); > + flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd + 1); And operating on a start + size also makes this kind of stuff clearer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Russell, On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:50:24AM +0530, Gupta, Ramesh wrote: >> static void flush_iopgd_range(u32 *first, u32 *last) >> { >> - /* FIXME: L2 cache should be taken care of if it exists */ >> - do { >> - asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 1 @ flush_pgd" >> - : : "r" (first)); >> - first += L1_CACHE_BYTES / sizeof(*first); >> - } while (first <= last); >> + flush_iommu_mem(first, last); >> + outer_flush_range(virt_to_phys(first), virt_to_phys(last)); > > I think this would be safer if these operated on an area rather than a > range - which means taking a start plus size. > > phys_addr_t phys = virt_to_phys(start); > > iommu_flush_area(start, size); > outer_flush_range(phys, phys + size); > > is safer than the above if virt_to_phys() is non-linear. Agree, I will use the area. > >> *iopgd = virt_to_phys(iopte) | IOPGD_TABLE; >> - flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd); >> + flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd + 1); > > And operating on a start + size also makes this kind of stuff clearer. Sure, I will cleanup this and send an updated patch series. Thank you for the inputs. Best regards Ramesh Gupta G -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c index 6899dcd..f909019 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c @@ -469,22 +469,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap_foreach_iommu_device); */ static void flush_iopgd_range(u32 *first, u32 *last) { - /* FIXME: L2 cache should be taken care of if it exists */ - do { - asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 1 @ flush_pgd" - : : "r" (first)); - first += L1_CACHE_BYTES / sizeof(*first); - } while (first <= last); + flush_iommu_mem(first, last); + outer_flush_range(virt_to_phys(first), virt_to_phys(last)); } static void flush_iopte_range(u32 *first, u32 *last) { - /* FIXME: L2 cache should be taken care of if it exists */ - do { - asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 1 @ flush_pte" - : : "r" (first)); - first += L1_CACHE_BYTES / sizeof(*first); - } while (first <= last); + flush_iommu_mem(first, last); + outer_flush_range(virt_to_phys(first), virt_to_phys(last)); } static void iopte_free(u32 *iopte) @@ -513,7 +505,7 @@ static u32 *iopte_alloc(struct omap_iommu *obj, u32 *iopgd, u32 da) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); *iopgd = virt_to_phys(iopte) | IOPGD_TABLE; - flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd); + flush_iopgd_range(iopgd, iopgd + 1); dev_vdbg(obj->dev, "%s: a new pte:%p\n", __func__, iopte);