diff mbox

[PATCHv8,00/23] I2C big cleanup

Message ID 20120913053325.GC6504@arwen.pp.htv.fi (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Felipe Balbi Sept. 13, 2012, 5:33 a.m. UTC
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:27:22PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >
> > This is the cleanup only series.
> >   
> > Tested on omap4sdp and 3430sdp.
> 
> It would be extremely helpful if you would describe how this was tested.
> And for me, it would be a source of extreme joy if you described any PM
> testing.
> 
> I gave this some additional PM testing on 3430/n900, 3530/Overo,
> 3730/OveroSTORM, 3730/Beagle-xM and 4430/Panda.
> 
> I tested v3.6-rc5 which passed all PM tests and then added this series
> (by merging the i2c-embedded/i2c-next branch.)  PM tests then fail.
> 
> At least on 3530/Overo and 3730/Overo, CORE no longer hits retenion (or
> off) during idle.  
> 
> The easy way to notice this is to see that even when no i2c transactions
> are happening, the runtime PM status for omap_i2c.1 is remains 'active':
> 
> # cat omap_i2c.*/power/runtime_status 
> active
> suspended
> 
> Of course that means that clocks are never gated during idle, and CORE
> will never hit retention.
> 
> I noticed it because my PM tests detected that the CORE powerdomain was
> not transitioning to retention (or off) during idle.
> 
> To reproduce, simply enable UART timeouts so CORE will hit retention:
> 
> echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.0/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
> echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.1/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
> echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
> echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.3/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
> 
> and check the core_pwrm state counters:
> 
> cat /debug/pm_debug/count
> 
> wait > 3 seconds for the UART autosuspend timers to kick in.  At this
> point, CORE should be transitioning to retenion in idle (determined by
> noticing that the RET counter for core_pwrdm is increasing.)

I just ran same tests on pandaboard and i2c is suspended actually,
though no power domain transitions to RET. Do we not have retention
while idle on pandaboard ?

See below for a few results... First I ran this script to set everything
up:

#!/bin/sh

echo "mounting proc"
mount -t proc none /proc

echo "mounting sysfs"
mount -t sysfs none /sys

echo "mounting debugfs"
mount -t debugfs none /debug

echo "UART autosuspend delay"
echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.0/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.1/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/power/autosuspend_delay_ms
echo 3000 > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.3/power/autosuspend_delay_ms

echo "check omap_i2c.* status"
cat /sys/devices/platform/omap_i2c.*/power/runtime_status

echo "check CORE pm counters"
grep "^core_pwrdm" /debug/pm_debug/count

Then I triggered a few i2c transfers by reading regulator status through
sysfs:

# cat /sys/class/regulator/regulator.*/status
[  507.469299] omap_i2c omap_i2c.1: omap_i2c_runtime_resume
normal
normal
off
off
normal
normal
normal
normal
normal
off
# [  509.010711] omap_i2c omap_i2c.1: omap_i2c_runtime_suspend
cat /sys/devices/platform/omap_i2c.*/power/runtime_status
suspended
suspended
suspended
suspended

notice the prints I've added... I don't know what could go wrong only on
Overo that i2c doesn't suspend. Can you add this debugging patch just
for me to see if, at least, omap_i2c_runtime_suspend is being called ?


this is on top of Wolfram's for-next branch, btw. Maybe you should also
add:

CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE=y
CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_ALGO=y
CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_BUS=y

to your .config just in case.

cheers

Comments

Kevin Hilman Sept. 13, 2012, 2:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> writes:

[...]

> I just ran same tests on pandaboard and i2c is suspended actually,
> though no power domain transitions to RET. Do we not have retention
> while idle on pandaboard ?

Not for CORE.  Only CPUx and MPU domains will be transitioning on OMAP4,
and then, only with CPUidle enabled.

Until we have CORE retention support in mainline (we're almost there)
OMAP4 is not a useful test platform for device PM.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index c78431a..ac61664 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -1238,6 +1238,8 @@  static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
 	struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	u16 iv;
 
+	dev_info(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
+
 	_dev->iestate = omap_i2c_read_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG);
 
 	omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG, 0);
@@ -1277,6 +1279,8 @@  static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	if (_dev->iestate)
 		omap_i2c_write_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG, _dev->iestate);
 
+	dev_info(dev, "%s\n", __func__);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME */