| Message ID | 1347374030-5832-1-git-send-email-bo.li.liu@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:33:50PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > Users report a bug, the reproducer is: > $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop0 > $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs/ > $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/dir > $ chattr +C /mnt/btrfs/dir/ > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=10; > $ lsattr /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo > ---------------C- /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo > $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo > /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 1 extent found ---> an extent > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=1 seek=5 conv=notrunc,nocreat; sync > $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo > /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 3 extents found ---> with nocow, btrfs breaks the extent into three parts > > The new created file should not only inherit the NODATACOW flag, but also > honor NODATASUM flag, because we must do COW on a file extent with checksum. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index b2c3514..9bce6e9 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4720,8 +4720,7 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, if (S_ISREG(mode)) { if (btrfs_test_opt(root, NODATASUM)) BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM; - if (btrfs_test_opt(root, NODATACOW) || - (BTRFS_I(dir)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW)) + if (btrfs_test_opt(root, NODATACOW)) BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW; } diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 00ddf22..6c867ec 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -140,8 +140,11 @@ void btrfs_inherit_iflags(struct inode *inode, struct inode *dir) BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_COMPRESS; } - if (flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) + if (flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) { BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW; + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) + BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM; + } btrfs_update_iflags(inode); }
Users report a bug, the reproducer is: $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs/ $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/dir $ chattr +C /mnt/btrfs/dir/ $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=10; $ lsattr /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo ---------------C- /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 1 extent found ---> an extent $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=1 seek=5 conv=notrunc,nocreat; sync $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 3 extents found ---> with nocow, btrfs breaks the extent into three parts The new created file should not only inherit the NODATACOW flag, but also honor NODATASUM flag, because we must do COW on a file extent with checksum. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> --- v3: fix my stupid finger error. fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)