=============
From: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Updates to the mmc-twl4030 code:
- Partial workaround for the bug fixed more comprehensively
by f4223ec219313d631c3f620220ed23670c158a34 ... workaround
applies only to MMC devs using this code.
- Fix a cut'n'paste bug as noted by Adrian Hunter: the intent
was to "disable" not (re)"enable".
The reason to want this workaround is lack of faith that any
sane fix for that regulator framework bug will ever merge,
while still wanting to see things work in mainline.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
---
I suggest reverting f4223ec219313d631c3f620220ed23670c158a34
after applying this ...
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -128,6 +128,27 @@ static int twl_mmc_late_init(struct devi
reg = regulator_get(dev, "vmmc_aux");
hsmmc[i].vcc_aux = IS_ERR(reg) ? NULL : reg;
+ /* UGLY HACK: workaround regulator framework bugs.
+ * When the bootloader leaves a supply active, it's
+ * initialized with zero usecount ... and we can't
+ * disable it without first disabling it. Until the
+ * framework is fixed, we need a workaround like this
+ * (which is safe for MMC, but not in general).
+ */
+ if (regulator_is_enabled(hsmmc[i].vcc) > 0) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "APPLY REGULATOR HACK for vmmc\n");
+ regulator_enable(hsmmc[i].vcc);
+ regulator_disable(hsmmc[i].vcc);
+ }
+ if (hsmmc[i].vcc_aux) {
+ if (regulator_is_enabled(reg) > 0) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "APPLY REGULATOR HACK "
+ "for vmmc_aux\n");
+ regulator_enable(reg);
+ regulator_disable(reg);
+ }
+ }
+
break;
}
}
@@ -285,7 +306,7 @@ static int twl_mmc23_set_power(struct de
}
} else {
if (c->vcc_aux)
- ret = regulator_enable(c->vcc_aux);
+ ret = regulator_disable(c->vcc_aux);
if (ret == 0)
ret = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(c->vcc, 0);
}