[1/1] HID: Fix missing Unifying device issue

Message ID	1348222894-6767-1-git-send-email-nlopezcasad@logitech.com (mailing list archive)
State	New, archived
Delegated to:	Jiri Kosina
Headers	show Return-Path: <linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org> From: Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@logitech.com> To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@gmail.com>, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 685360@bugs.debian.org, john.ettedgui@gmail.com, barz621@gmail.com, joy@debbugs.entuzijast.net, dh.herrmann@googlemail.com, Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@logitech.com> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] HID: Fix missing Unifying device issue Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:21:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1348222894-6767-1-git-send-email-nlopezcasad@logitech.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c index 4d524b5..9500f2f 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.c @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static struct hid_ll_driver logi_dj_ll_driver; static int logi_dj_output_hidraw_report(struct hid_device *hid, u8 * buf, size_t count, unsigned char report_type); +static int logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev); static void logi_dj_recv_destroy_djhid_device(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, struct dj_report *dj_report) @@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_device(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, if (dj_report->report_params[DEVICE_PAIRED_PARAM_SPFUNCTION] & SPFUNCTION_DEVICE_LIST_EMPTY) { dbg_hid("%s: device list is empty\n", __func__); + djrcv_dev->querying_devices = false; return; } @@ -243,6 +245,12 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_add_djhid_device(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, return; } + if (djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report->device_index]) { + /* The device is already known. No need to reallocate it. */ + dbg_hid("%s: device is already known\n", __func__); + return; + } + dj_hiddev = hid_allocate_device(); if (IS_ERR(dj_hiddev)) { dev_err(&djrcv_hdev->dev, "%s: hid_allocate_device failed\n", @@ -306,6 +314,7 @@ static void delayedwork_callback(struct work_struct *work) struct dj_report dj_report; unsigned long flags; int count; + int retval; dbg_hid("%s\n", __func__); @@ -338,6 +347,25 @@ static void delayedwork_callback(struct work_struct *work) logi_dj_recv_destroy_djhid_device(djrcv_dev, &dj_report); break; default: + /* A normal report (i. e. not belonging to a pair/unpair notification) + * arriving here, means that the report arrived but we did not have a + * paired dj_device associated to the report's device_index, this + * means that the original "device paired" notification corresponding + * to this dj_device never arrived to this driver. The reason is that + * hid-core discards all packets coming from a device while probe() is + * executing. */ + if (!djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report.device_index]) { + /* ok, we don't know the device, just re-ask the + * receiver for the list of connected devices. */ + retval = logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices(djrcv_dev); + if (!retval) { + /* everything went fine, so just leave */ + break; + } + dev_err(&djrcv_dev->hdev->dev, + "%s:logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices " + "error:%d\n", __func__, retval); + } dbg_hid("%s: unexpected report type\n", __func__); } } @@ -368,6 +396,12 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_forward_null_report(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, if (!djdev) { dbg_hid("djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report->device_index]" " is NULL, index %d\n", dj_report->device_index); + kfifo_in(&djrcv_dev->notif_fifo, dj_report, sizeof(struct dj_report)); + + if (schedule_work(&djrcv_dev->work) == 0) { + dbg_hid("%s: did not schedule the work item, was already " + "queued\n", __func__); + } return; } @@ -398,6 +432,12 @@ static void logi_dj_recv_forward_report(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, if (dj_device == NULL) { dbg_hid("djrcv_dev->paired_dj_devices[dj_report->device_index]" " is NULL, index %d\n", dj_report->device_index); + kfifo_in(&djrcv_dev->notif_fifo, dj_report, sizeof(struct dj_report)); + + if (schedule_work(&djrcv_dev->work) == 0) { + dbg_hid("%s: did not schedule the work item, was already " + "queued\n", __func__); + } return; } @@ -439,6 +479,10 @@ static int logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev) struct dj_report *dj_report; int retval; + /* no need to protect djrcv_dev->querying_devices */ + if (djrcv_dev->querying_devices) + return 0; + dj_report = kzalloc(sizeof(struct dj_report), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dj_report) return -ENOMEM; @@ -450,6 +494,7 @@ static int logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev) return retval; } + static int logi_dj_recv_switch_to_dj_mode(struct dj_receiver_dev *djrcv_dev, unsigned timeout) { diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h index fd28a5e..4a40003 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-dj.h @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct dj_receiver_dev { struct work_struct work; struct kfifo notif_fifo; spinlock_t lock; + bool querying_devices; }; struct dj_device {

[1/1] HID: Fix missing Unifying device issue

Commit Message

Comments

Patch