Message ID | 1349276133-26408-4-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Matt, On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > From: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com> > > This patch modifies the sram allocator to allocate memory > from the DA8XX shared RAM. > > Signed-off-by: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com> > [rebased onto consolidated SRAM patches] > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> > [rebased to mainline as consolidated SRAM patches were dropped] > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com> Were you able to test PM with this change or you need my help? Thanks, Sekhar
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:27:23PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Matt, > > On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > From: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com> > > > > This patch modifies the sram allocator to allocate memory > > from the DA8XX shared RAM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com> > > [rebased onto consolidated SRAM patches] > > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> > > [rebased to mainline as consolidated SRAM patches were dropped] > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com> > > Were you able to test PM with this change or you need my help? I'll try it out now and if I have problems I may need to enlist your help here. :) -Matt
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:27:23PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Matt, > > On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > From: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com> > > > > This patch modifies the sram allocator to allocate memory > > from the DA8XX shared RAM. > > > > Signed-off-by: Subhasish Ghosh <subhasish@mistralsolutions.com> > > [rebased onto consolidated SRAM patches] > > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> > > [rebased to mainline as consolidated SRAM patches were dropped] > > Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com> > > Were you able to test PM with this change or you need my help? I verified suspend/resume is working fine with this change on AM180x EVM. Will note this all in v4. -Matt
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c index b4b324f..d8d69de 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c @@ -1081,8 +1081,8 @@ static struct davinci_soc_info davinci_soc_info_da850 = { .gpio_irq = IRQ_DA8XX_GPIO0, .serial_dev = &da8xx_serial_device, .emac_pdata = &da8xx_emac_pdata, - .sram_dma = DA8XX_ARM_RAM_BASE, - .sram_len = SZ_8K, + .sram_dma = DA8XX_SHARED_RAM_BASE, + .sram_len = SZ_128K, }; void __init da850_init(void) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h index c9ee723..20553cf 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ extern unsigned int da850_max_speed; #define DA8XX_AEMIF_CS2_BASE 0x60000000 #define DA8XX_AEMIF_CS3_BASE 0x62000000 #define DA8XX_AEMIF_CTL_BASE 0x68000000 +#define DA8XX_SHARED_RAM_BASE 0x80000000 #define DA8XX_ARM_RAM_BASE 0xffff0000 void __init da830_init(void);