Message ID | 1352121653-30904-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:20:53 +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips > on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by calling intel_finish_fb() on > the current front buffer. But the pending flips were actually tracked > in the BO of the previous front buffer, so the call to intel_finish_fb() > never did anything useful. > > intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips() is the current _working_ way to wait > for pending page flips. So use it in intel_pipe_set_base() too. Some > refactoring was necessary to avoid locking struct_mutex twice. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:20:53PM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips > on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by calling intel_finish_fb() on > the current front buffer. But the pending flips were actually tracked > in the BO of the previous front buffer, so the call to intel_finish_fb() > never did anything useful. > > intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips() is the current _working_ way to wait > for pending page flips. So use it in intel_pipe_set_base() too. Some > refactoring was necessary to avoid locking struct_mutex twice. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > --- > v2: Shuffle the code around so that intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips() > just wraps intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(). Sorry for the long delay in looking at this. One bikeshed here: I prefer the patch changelog before the sob lines so that it gets included in the commit message - most often it's rather interesting read, especially for patches that take a few revisions to get right. More substantial comment below. > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 1a38267..a18e6e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -2228,6 +2228,46 @@ static void intel_crtc_update_sarea_pos(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) > } > } > > +static bool intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > +{ > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + unsigned long flags; > + bool pending; > + > + if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged)) > + return false; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags); > + pending = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->unpin_work != NULL; > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); > + > + return pending; > +} > + > +static void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > +{ > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + > + if (crtc->fb == NULL) > + return; > + > + wait_event(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, > + !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc)); I think we also need to add a dev_priv->mm.wedged check here, since the gpu might die and never execute the pageflip. Otoh we don't complete any pageflips that never executed due to a gpu hang, so maybe also add a big FIXME. But with the wedged check we should at least not hang in an non-interruptible wait. The other thing is that the wait_even in finish_fb is not superflous, since we should never see a framebuffer with pending flips for _this_ crtc (it could have a pending flip on another crtc). So I think that code in finish_fb should die, leaving just the comment and the finish_gpu call. Cheers, Daniel PS: Testcase would be awesome, but I have no ideas beyond what we already have in flip_test unfortunately ...
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:21:28PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:20:53PM +0200, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > > > intel_pipe_set_base() never actually waited for any pending page flips > > on the CRTC. It looks like it tried to, by calling intel_finish_fb() on > > the current front buffer. But the pending flips were actually tracked > > in the BO of the previous front buffer, so the call to intel_finish_fb() > > never did anything useful. > > > > intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips() is the current _working_ way to wait > > for pending page flips. So use it in intel_pipe_set_base() too. Some > > refactoring was necessary to avoid locking struct_mutex twice. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > v2: Shuffle the code around so that intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips() > > just wraps intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(). > > Sorry for the long delay in looking at this. One bikeshed here: I prefer > the patch changelog before the sob lines so that it gets included in the > commit message - most often it's rather interesting read, especially for > patches that take a few revisions to get right. More substantial comment > below. > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index 1a38267..a18e6e6 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -2228,6 +2228,46 @@ static void intel_crtc_update_sarea_pos(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) > > } > > } > > > > +static bool intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > +{ > > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > + unsigned long flags; > > + bool pending; > > + > > + if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged)) > > + return false; > > + > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags); > > + pending = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->unpin_work != NULL; > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); > > + > > + return pending; > > +} > > + > > +static void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > +{ > > + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > + > > + if (crtc->fb == NULL) > > + return; > > + > > + wait_event(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, > > + !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc)); > > I think we also need to add a dev_priv->mm.wedged check here, since the > gpu might die and never execute the pageflip. Otoh we don't complete any > pageflips that never executed due to a gpu hang, so maybe also add a big > FIXME. But with the wedged check we should at least not hang in an > non-interruptible wait. > > The other thing is that the wait_even in finish_fb is not superflous, > since we should never see a framebuffer with pending flips for _this_ crtc > (it could have a pending flip on another crtc). So I think that code in > finish_fb should die, leaving just the comment and the finish_gpu call. > > Cheers, Daniel > > PS: Testcase would be awesome, but I have no ideas beyond what we already > have in flip_test unfortunately ... Ok, the patch is actually correct, I just couldn't read C code for a moment. Still I think a v3 with the superflous wait_event in finish_fb ditched would look nice. Now Chris reminded me that you have a few other patches around this in the "drm/i915: i915_gem_execbuffer_wait_for_flips and other flip stuff" thread. And I have a few reset state transition improvements in the pipeline for 3.9 at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/log/?h=robustify-reset-transitions Can you please rebase that entire patch series on top of those patches? For patch 3 I think we should go with option b) and outright kill the wait-for-flips in the execbuf ioctl. Maybe harrass Jesse and Kristian for a formal ack on that one. Also, if you can throw an additional patch on top to properly clear any outstanding flips when the gpu hangs, that would be awesome - since currently pageflips will get busted if the gpu hangs. And if you could throw a testcase in for fun ... Cheers, Daniel PS: The testcase should be easy to pull of by adapting ZZ_hangman with a different workload. Like flip_test ...
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 1a38267..a18e6e6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -2228,6 +2228,46 @@ static void intel_crtc_update_sarea_pos(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) } } +static bool intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + unsigned long flags; + bool pending; + + if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged)) + return false; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags); + pending = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->unpin_work != NULL; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); + + return pending; +} + +static void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(struct drm_crtc *crtc) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + + if (crtc->fb == NULL) + return; + + wait_event(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, + !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc)); + + intel_finish_fb(crtc->fb); +} + +static void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(struct drm_crtc *crtc) +{ + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; + + mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); + intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(crtc); + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); +} + static int intel_pipe_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y, struct drm_framebuffer *fb) @@ -2261,8 +2301,7 @@ intel_pipe_set_base(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y, return ret; } - if (crtc->fb) - intel_finish_fb(crtc->fb); + intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips_locked(crtc); ret = dev_priv->display.update_plane(crtc, fb, x, y); if (ret) { @@ -2901,39 +2940,6 @@ static void ironlake_fdi_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc) udelay(100); } -static bool intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc) -{ - struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - unsigned long flags; - bool pending; - - if (atomic_read(&dev_priv->mm.wedged)) - return false; - - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags); - pending = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->unpin_work != NULL; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); - - return pending; -} - -static void intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(struct drm_crtc *crtc) -{ - struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - - if (crtc->fb == NULL) - return; - - wait_event(dev_priv->pending_flip_queue, - !intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(crtc)); - - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); - intel_finish_fb(crtc->fb); - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); -} - static bool ironlake_crtc_driving_pch(struct drm_crtc *crtc) { struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;