| Message ID | 1352916505-12343-2-git-send-email-anilkumar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 11/14/2012 07:08 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote: > Add D_CAN raminit support to C_CAN driver to enable D_CAN RAM, > which holds all the message objects during transmission or > receiving of data. This initialization/de-initialization should > be done in synchronous with D_CAN clock. > > In case of AM335X-EVM (active user of D_CAN driver) message RAM is > controlled through control module register for both instances. So > control module register details is required to initialization or > de-initialization of message RAM according to instance number. > > Control module memory resource is obtained from D_CAN dt node and > instance number obtained from device tree aliases node. > > Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com> Some nitpicks inline. Marc > --- > drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 12 +++++++++++ > drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h | 3 +++ > drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c > index e5180df..c15830c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c > @@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ static inline void c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(const struct c_can_priv *priv) > pm_runtime_put_sync(priv->device); > } > > +static inline void c_can_reset_ram(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable) > +{ > + if (priv->ram_init) > + priv->ram_init(priv, enable); > +} > + > static inline int get_tx_next_msg_obj(const struct c_can_priv *priv) > { > return (priv->tx_next & C_CAN_NEXT_MSG_OBJ_MASK) + > @@ -1090,6 +1096,7 @@ static int c_can_open(struct net_device *dev) > struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); > > c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync(priv); > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, true); > > /* open the can device */ > err = open_candev(dev); > @@ -1118,6 +1125,7 @@ static int c_can_open(struct net_device *dev) > exit_irq_fail: > close_candev(dev); > exit_open_fail: > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); > c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); > return err; > } > @@ -1131,6 +1139,8 @@ static int c_can_close(struct net_device *dev) > c_can_stop(dev); > free_irq(dev->irq, dev); > close_candev(dev); > + > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); > c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); > > return 0; > @@ -1188,6 +1198,7 @@ int c_can_power_down(struct net_device *dev) > > c_can_stop(dev); > > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); > c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); > > return 0; > @@ -1206,6 +1217,7 @@ int c_can_power_up(struct net_device *dev) > WARN_ON(priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN); > > c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync(priv); > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, true); > > /* Clear PDR and INIT bits */ > val = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_CTRL_EX_REG); > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > index e5ed41d..419de5c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct c_can_priv { > void *priv; /* for board-specific data */ > u16 irqstatus; > enum c_can_dev_id type; > + u32 __iomem *raminit_ctrlreg; > + unsigned int instance; > + void (*ram_init) (const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable); > }; > > struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void); > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c > index ee141613..2e61d69 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ > > #include "c_can.h" > > +#define CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(i) (1 << (i)) > + > /* > * 16-bit c_can registers can be arranged differently in the memory > * architecture of different implementations. For example: 16-bit > @@ -68,6 +70,24 @@ static void c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_32bit(struct c_can_priv *priv, > writew(val, priv->base + 2 * priv->regs[index]); > } > > +static void c_can_hw_raminit(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable) > +{ > + u32 val; > + > + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg || (priv->instance < 0)) > + return; Can you move this sanity check to the probe function and only assign priv->ram_init if the above is true? > + > + val = readl(priv->raminit_ctrlreg); > + if (enable) { > + val &= ~CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); > + val |= CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); > + writel(val, priv->raminit_ctrlreg); > + } else { > + val &= ~CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); > + writel(val, priv->raminit_ctrlreg); > + } > +} > + > static struct platform_device_id c_can_id_table[] = { > [BOSCH_C_CAN_PLATFORM] = { > .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > @@ -99,7 +119,7 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > const struct of_device_id *match; > const struct platform_device_id *id; > struct pinctrl *pinctrl; > - struct resource *mem; > + struct resource *mem, *res; > int irq; > struct clk *clk; > > @@ -178,6 +198,18 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > priv->can.ctrlmode_supported |= CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES; > priv->read_reg = c_can_plat_read_reg_aligned_to_16bit; > priv->write_reg = c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_16bit; > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1); > + priv->raminit_ctrlreg = > + devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res); What happens if there isn't a second IORESOURCE_MEM region? devm_request will print an error in this case and any other error, too [1]. Do we need streamlining here? [1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L59 > + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg) > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to obtain control memory\n"); > + > + if (pdev->dev.of_node) > + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "d_can"); > + > + priv->instance = pdev->id; Please do not modify the pdev, better you use something like this: pdev->id < 0 ? of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "d_can") : pdev->id; > + priv->ram_init = c_can_hw_raminit; > break; > default: > ret = -EINVAL; > Marc
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 16:20:41, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 11/14/2012 07:08 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote: > > Add D_CAN raminit support to C_CAN driver to enable D_CAN RAM, > > which holds all the message objects during transmission or > > receiving of data. This initialization/de-initialization should > > be done in synchronous with D_CAN clock. > > > > In case of AM335X-EVM (active user of D_CAN driver) message RAM is > > controlled through control module register for both instances. So > > control module register details is required to initialization or > > de-initialization of message RAM according to instance number. > > > > Control module memory resource is obtained from D_CAN dt node and > > instance number obtained from device tree aliases node. > > > > Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com> > > Some nitpicks inline. Thanks for the review. > > > --- > > drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 12 +++++++++++ > > drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h | 3 +++ > > drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c > > index e5180df..c15830c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c > > @@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ static inline void c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(const struct c_can_priv *priv) > > pm_runtime_put_sync(priv->device); > > } > > > > +static inline void c_can_reset_ram(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable) > > +{ > > + if (priv->ram_init) > > + priv->ram_init(priv, enable); > > +} > > + > > static inline int get_tx_next_msg_obj(const struct c_can_priv *priv) > > { > > return (priv->tx_next & C_CAN_NEXT_MSG_OBJ_MASK) + > > @@ -1090,6 +1096,7 @@ static int c_can_open(struct net_device *dev) > > struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); > > > > c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync(priv); > > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, true); > > > > /* open the can device */ > > err = open_candev(dev); > > @@ -1118,6 +1125,7 @@ static int c_can_open(struct net_device *dev) > > exit_irq_fail: > > close_candev(dev); > > exit_open_fail: > > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); > > c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); > > return err; > > } > > @@ -1131,6 +1139,8 @@ static int c_can_close(struct net_device *dev) > > c_can_stop(dev); > > free_irq(dev->irq, dev); > > close_candev(dev); > > + > > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); > > c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); > > > > return 0; > > @@ -1188,6 +1198,7 @@ int c_can_power_down(struct net_device *dev) > > > > c_can_stop(dev); > > > > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); > > c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); > > > > return 0; > > @@ -1206,6 +1217,7 @@ int c_can_power_up(struct net_device *dev) > > WARN_ON(priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN); > > > > c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync(priv); > > + c_can_reset_ram(priv, true); > > > > /* Clear PDR and INIT bits */ > > val = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_CTRL_EX_REG); > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > > index e5ed41d..419de5c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h > > @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct c_can_priv { > > void *priv; /* for board-specific data */ > > u16 irqstatus; > > enum c_can_dev_id type; > > + u32 __iomem *raminit_ctrlreg; > > + unsigned int instance; > > + void (*ram_init) (const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable); > > }; > > > > struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void); > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c > > index ee141613..2e61d69 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c > > @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ > > > > #include "c_can.h" > > > > +#define CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(i) (1 << (i)) > > + > > /* > > * 16-bit c_can registers can be arranged differently in the memory > > * architecture of different implementations. For example: 16-bit > > @@ -68,6 +70,24 @@ static void c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_32bit(struct c_can_priv *priv, > > writew(val, priv->base + 2 * priv->regs[index]); > > } > > > > +static void c_can_hw_raminit(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable) > > +{ > > + u32 val; > > + > > + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg || (priv->instance < 0)) > > + return; > > Can you move this sanity check to the probe function and only assign > priv->ram_init if the above is true? Sure, I will change > > > + > > + val = readl(priv->raminit_ctrlreg); > > + if (enable) { > > + val &= ~CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); > > + val |= CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); > > + writel(val, priv->raminit_ctrlreg); > > + } else { > > + val &= ~CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); > > + writel(val, priv->raminit_ctrlreg); > > + } > > +} > > + > > static struct platform_device_id c_can_id_table[] = { > > [BOSCH_C_CAN_PLATFORM] = { > > .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, > > @@ -99,7 +119,7 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > const struct of_device_id *match; > > const struct platform_device_id *id; > > struct pinctrl *pinctrl; > > - struct resource *mem; > > + struct resource *mem, *res; > > int irq; > > struct clk *clk; > > > > @@ -178,6 +198,18 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > priv->can.ctrlmode_supported |= CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES; > > priv->read_reg = c_can_plat_read_reg_aligned_to_16bit; > > priv->write_reg = c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_16bit; > > + > > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1); > > + priv->raminit_ctrlreg = > > + devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res); > > What happens if there isn't a second IORESOURCE_MEM region? devm_request > will print an error in this case and any other error, too [1]. Do we > need streamlining here? > > [1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L59 I did not get what the point is. In most of the cases above two API's returns NULL. Even res is NULL nothing to worry, first condition in devm_request_and_ioremap() is NULL pointer check of res. If "res" is NULL then devm_xx will return NULL which result into printing of below warning. > > > + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg) > > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to obtain control memory\n"); I will change this warning to info if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg) dev_info(&pdev->dev, "control memory is not used for raminit\n"); > > + > > + if (pdev->dev.of_node) > > + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "d_can"); > > + > > + priv->instance = pdev->id; > > Please do not modify the pdev, better you use something like this: > > pdev->id < 0 ? of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "d_can") : > pdev->id; I will change accordingly. Thanks AnilKumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/20/2012 02:05 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: [...] >>> static struct platform_device_id c_can_id_table[] = { >>> [BOSCH_C_CAN_PLATFORM] = { >>> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, >>> @@ -99,7 +119,7 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> const struct of_device_id *match; >>> const struct platform_device_id *id; >>> struct pinctrl *pinctrl; >>> - struct resource *mem; >>> + struct resource *mem, *res; >>> int irq; >>> struct clk *clk; >>> >>> @@ -178,6 +198,18 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> priv->can.ctrlmode_supported |= CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES; >>> priv->read_reg = c_can_plat_read_reg_aligned_to_16bit; >>> priv->write_reg = c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_16bit; >>> + >>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1); >>> + priv->raminit_ctrlreg = >>> + devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res); >> >> What happens if there isn't a second IORESOURCE_MEM region? devm_request >> will print an error in this case and any other error, too [1]. Do we >> need streamlining here? >> >> [1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L59 > > I did not get what the point is. > > In most of the cases above two API's returns NULL. Even res is NULL > nothing to worry, first condition in devm_request_and_ioremap() is > NULL pointer check of res. If "res" is NULL then devm_xx will return > NULL which result into printing of below warning. > >> >>> + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg) >>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to obtain control memory\n"); > > I will change this warning to info > > if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg) > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "control memory is not used for raminit\n"); That's more descriptive, good. Marc
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c index e5180df..c15830c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c @@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ static inline void c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(const struct c_can_priv *priv) pm_runtime_put_sync(priv->device); } +static inline void c_can_reset_ram(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable) +{ + if (priv->ram_init) + priv->ram_init(priv, enable); +} + static inline int get_tx_next_msg_obj(const struct c_can_priv *priv) { return (priv->tx_next & C_CAN_NEXT_MSG_OBJ_MASK) + @@ -1090,6 +1096,7 @@ static int c_can_open(struct net_device *dev) struct c_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync(priv); + c_can_reset_ram(priv, true); /* open the can device */ err = open_candev(dev); @@ -1118,6 +1125,7 @@ static int c_can_open(struct net_device *dev) exit_irq_fail: close_candev(dev); exit_open_fail: + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); return err; } @@ -1131,6 +1139,8 @@ static int c_can_close(struct net_device *dev) c_can_stop(dev); free_irq(dev->irq, dev); close_candev(dev); + + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); return 0; @@ -1188,6 +1198,7 @@ int c_can_power_down(struct net_device *dev) c_can_stop(dev); + c_can_reset_ram(priv, false); c_can_pm_runtime_put_sync(priv); return 0; @@ -1206,6 +1217,7 @@ int c_can_power_up(struct net_device *dev) WARN_ON(priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN); c_can_pm_runtime_get_sync(priv); + c_can_reset_ram(priv, true); /* Clear PDR and INIT bits */ val = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_CTRL_EX_REG); diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h index e5ed41d..419de5c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h @@ -169,6 +169,9 @@ struct c_can_priv { void *priv; /* for board-specific data */ u16 irqstatus; enum c_can_dev_id type; + u32 __iomem *raminit_ctrlreg; + unsigned int instance; + void (*ram_init) (const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable); }; struct net_device *alloc_c_can_dev(void); diff --git a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c index ee141613..2e61d69 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ #include "c_can.h" +#define CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(i) (1 << (i)) + /* * 16-bit c_can registers can be arranged differently in the memory * architecture of different implementations. For example: 16-bit @@ -68,6 +70,24 @@ static void c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_32bit(struct c_can_priv *priv, writew(val, priv->base + 2 * priv->regs[index]); } +static void c_can_hw_raminit(const struct c_can_priv *priv, bool enable) +{ + u32 val; + + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg || (priv->instance < 0)) + return; + + val = readl(priv->raminit_ctrlreg); + if (enable) { + val &= ~CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); + val |= CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); + writel(val, priv->raminit_ctrlreg); + } else { + val &= ~CAN_RAMINIT_START_MASK(priv->instance); + writel(val, priv->raminit_ctrlreg); + } +} + static struct platform_device_id c_can_id_table[] = { [BOSCH_C_CAN_PLATFORM] = { .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, @@ -99,7 +119,7 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) const struct of_device_id *match; const struct platform_device_id *id; struct pinctrl *pinctrl; - struct resource *mem; + struct resource *mem, *res; int irq; struct clk *clk; @@ -178,6 +198,18 @@ static int __devinit c_can_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) priv->can.ctrlmode_supported |= CAN_CTRLMODE_3_SAMPLES; priv->read_reg = c_can_plat_read_reg_aligned_to_16bit; priv->write_reg = c_can_plat_write_reg_aligned_to_16bit; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1); + priv->raminit_ctrlreg = + devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res); + if (!priv->raminit_ctrlreg) + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to obtain control memory\n"); + + if (pdev->dev.of_node) + pdev->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "d_can"); + + priv->instance = pdev->id; + priv->ram_init = c_can_hw_raminit; break; default: ret = -EINVAL;
Add D_CAN raminit support to C_CAN driver to enable D_CAN RAM, which holds all the message objects during transmission or receiving of data. This initialization/de-initialization should be done in synchronous with D_CAN clock. In case of AM335X-EVM (active user of D_CAN driver) message RAM is controlled through control module register for both instances. So control module register details is required to initialization or de-initialization of message RAM according to instance number. Control module memory resource is obtained from D_CAN dt node and instance number obtained from device tree aliases node. Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@ti.com> --- drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c | 12 +++++++++++ drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.h | 3 +++ drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_platform.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)