| Message ID | 1353029819-21809-3-git-send-email-ricardo.neri@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 07:36:59PM -0600, Ricardo Neri wrote: > This relocates and renames the platform devices for ASoC HDMI drivers > to give them a more logical structure. Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On 2012-11-16 03:36, Ricardo Neri wrote: > This relocates and renames the platform devices for ASoC HDMI drivers > to give them a more logical structure. > > The previous omap-hdmi-audio device is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio-card > and is relocated to the SDP4430 and Pandaboard board files. This is to > better illustrate the fact that it describes the whole HDMI audio > functionality on such boards, including the companion chip. > > The previous omap-hdmi-audio-dai is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio. The -dai > part is removed to not have references to ASoC concepts in the OMAPDSS > HDMI driver. Also, as it will be used by the ASoC HDMI CPU DAI driver, > the name refers only to OMAP HDMI audio functionality, irrespective of the > board. > > The names of the ASoC drivers are also updated accordingly. And same thing here as with the previous patch. Do the move and rename in separate patches for clarity. > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 17 ----------------- > drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c | 2 +- > sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c | 4 ++-- > sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > index 3669c12..97bdff3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c > @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@ static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec = { > .id = -1, > }; > > +static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card = { > + .name = "omap-hdmi-audio-card", > + .id = -1, > +}; > + > static struct omap_abe_twl6040_data sdp4430_abe_audio_data = { > .card_name = "SDP4430", > .has_hs = ABE_TWL6040_LEFT | ABE_TWL6040_RIGHT, > @@ -423,6 +428,7 @@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_devices[] __initdata = { > &sdp4430_dmic_codec, > &sdp4430_abe_audio, > &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec, > + &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card, > }; I don't know anything at all about the audio drivers, but this doesn't feel good to me. The HDMI audio is tied to the HDMI video, both of which are parts of OMAP SoC. So if you have two boards with HDMI video (and thus audio), the device data related to HDMI video and audio are identical except for a few HW details like the GPIOs for the TPD chip. So is there any reason to add hdmi audio devices in each board file? It sounds to me that a common place to add the device for all boards would make more sense. This could, perhaps, be arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c which handles adding the HDMI device, or some other similar file (although you just removed it from such a file, the devices.c...). And actually, why isn't the card driver added in the hdmi video driver, like the omap-hdmi-audio-dai? You say the omap-hdmi-audio-card covers also the TPD chip, but why does HDMI audio even need to cover that chip? It has no relevance to the audio side, as long as the video driver enables it properly, right? Perhaps I'm missing something here, as I don't have any knowledge of the audio side, though. What do the different audio devices represent? So I'm not saying your approach is wrong, I just don't understand it =). Tomi
On 11/16/2012 01:52 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-11-16 03:36, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> This relocates and renames the platform devices for ASoC HDMI drivers >> to give them a more logical structure. >> >> The previous omap-hdmi-audio device is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio-card >> and is relocated to the SDP4430 and Pandaboard board files. This is to >> better illustrate the fact that it describes the whole HDMI audio >> functionality on such boards, including the companion chip. >> >> The previous omap-hdmi-audio-dai is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio. The -dai >> part is removed to not have references to ASoC concepts in the OMAPDSS >> HDMI driver. Also, as it will be used by the ASoC HDMI CPU DAI driver, >> the name refers only to OMAP HDMI audio functionality, irrespective of the >> board. >> >> The names of the ASoC drivers are also updated accordingly. > > And same thing here as with the previous patch. Do the move and rename > in separate patches for clarity. OK. I'll do. > >> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@ti.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 ++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 6 ++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 17 ----------------- >> drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c | 2 +- >> sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c | 4 ++-- >> sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c | 2 +- >> 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c >> index 3669c12..97bdff3 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c >> @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@ static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec = { >> .id = -1, >> }; >> >> +static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card = { >> + .name = "omap-hdmi-audio-card", >> + .id = -1, >> +}; >> + >> static struct omap_abe_twl6040_data sdp4430_abe_audio_data = { >> .card_name = "SDP4430", >> .has_hs = ABE_TWL6040_LEFT | ABE_TWL6040_RIGHT, >> @@ -423,6 +428,7 @@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_devices[] __initdata = { >> &sdp4430_dmic_codec, >> &sdp4430_abe_audio, >> &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec, >> + &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card, >> }; > > I don't know anything at all about the audio drivers, but this doesn't > feel good to me. The HDMI audio is tied to the HDMI video, both of which > are parts of OMAP SoC. So if you have two boards with HDMI video (and > thus audio), the device data related to HDMI video and audio are > identical except for a few HW details like the GPIOs for the TPD chip. > > So is there any reason to add hdmi audio devices in each board file? It > sounds to me that a common place to add the device for all boards would > make more sense. This could, perhaps, be arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c > which handles adding the HDMI device, or some other similar file > (although you just removed it from such a file, the devices.c...). In ASoC, we have three drivers for ASoC HDMI audio. The CPU-DAI driver deals with the CPU audio interface. So, I regard the OMAP HDMI IP as the CPU DAI. A device is needed to probe the driver, but as HDMI audio and video are the same physical component, it made sense to have the HDMI video driver to create it. Furthermore, except for the TPD handling the HDMI driver deals only with OMAP stuff. Also, we will have a single node for HDMI when DT comes. Thus, the device for the ASoC CPU DAI has to be created somewhere. We also have codec. ASoC codecs are chips like TWL6040 that render/capture audio. For ASoC HDMI, a TV or a home theater unit could be regarded as the codec. Strictly speaking, it is not a device mounted on the board such as TWL6040 but does the same work and we have to represent it for ASoC to use. Finally we have the ASoC machine (or board) driver, that glues together the DAI and codec. > > And actually, why isn't the card driver added in the hdmi video driver, > like the omap-hdmi-audio-dai? The card driver represents a board. It made sense to me to relocate it into the board files. Furthermore, when HDMI DT is supported in the feature, the node for this machine driver will be in the DT; so, we will not needed and we would end up relocating it anyways. > > You say the omap-hdmi-audio-card covers also the TPD chip, but why does > HDMI audio even need to cover that chip? It has no relevance to the > audio side, as long as the video driver enables it properly, right? Yes, audio does not have anything to do with the TPD chip, but we do need an ASoC machine driver. Thus, the only components that are there to describe an ASoC machine driver are the OMAP, TPD and the HDMI connector. Indeed, to not tie the ASoC machine driver to a specific companion chip (as commented by Liam), I just used the -card suffix. > > Perhaps I'm missing something here, as I don't have any knowledge of the > audio side, though. What do the different audio devices represent? I hope the explanation above provides more clarity to you. I think HDMI does not fit seamlessly into the ASoC driver model, as we don't have a real codec and no machine driver seems to be needed. This is the best I could get. :/ :) > > So I'm not saying your approach is wrong, I just don't understand it =). :) BR, Ricardo > > Tomi > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2012-11-16 20:05, Ricardo Neri wrote: > I hope the explanation above provides more clarity to you. I think HDMI > does not fit seamlessly into the ASoC driver model, as we don't have a > real codec and no machine driver seems to be needed. This is the best I > could get. :/ :) Ok. I can't say I fully grasp everything about the audio architecture, but this clarified it anyway. So I'm fine with the three audio related devices. But I still have the following points: The name of the codec platform_device is "hdmi-audio-codec". Isn't that too generic name? Shouldn't it be "omap-hdmi-audio-codec"? Then again, you said in this case it represents the tv-set. If so, should it be a generic codec driver, without any reference to omap? I still don't understand why the codec and machine drivers need to be created in the board file. That just forces us to replicate the same code for all OMAP boards that have OMAP HDMI output. Why not create the devices in some common code, for example arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c? With DT this should be similar: OMAP's hdmi devices should be presented in the omap4.dtsi file, not in each individual board dts. Although the DT data should represent the hardware, and if the code and machine devices are not really there in the HW, then... I don't know =). And something that confuses me: sound/soc/codecs/omap-hdmi.c contains a codec and dai drivers, but sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c also contains a dai driver. The latter actually contains two dai drivers, the other a platform driver and the other a snd_soc_dai_driver. But I guess this is asoc details, and not relevant to this disuccsion =). Tomi
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > I still don't understand why the codec and machine drivers need to be > created in the board file. That just forces us to replicate the same > code for all OMAP boards that have OMAP HDMI output. Why not create the > devices in some common code, for example arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c? Yes, this would be more sensible if there's no board specifics involved. > With DT this should be similar: OMAP's hdmi devices should be presented > in the omap4.dtsi file, not in each individual board dts. Although the > DT data should represent the hardware, and if the code and machine > devices are not really there in the HW, then... I don't know =). Well, in a case like this where the sound card is essentially autoprobed based on the detection of the hardware at runtime the sound card probably shouldn't appear in the device tree at all - you'll probably want something to say there's a physical HDMI port it's worth looking at there but everything else should be figured out at runtime. > And something that confuses me: sound/soc/codecs/omap-hdmi.c contains a > codec and dai drivers, but sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c also contains a > dai driver. The latter actually contains two dai drivers, the other a > platform driver and the other a snd_soc_dai_driver. But I guess this is > asoc details, and not relevant to this disuccsion =). There's an interaface on each end of the link, they're wired together to communicate between the two devices.
Hi Tomi, Sorry for the delayed response. On 11/19/2012 06:58 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-11-16 20:05, Ricardo Neri wrote: > >> I hope the explanation above provides more clarity to you. I think HDMI >> does not fit seamlessly into the ASoC driver model, as we don't have a >> real codec and no machine driver seems to be needed. This is the best I >> could get. :/ :) > > Ok. I can't say I fully grasp everything about the audio architecture, > but this clarified it anyway. > > So I'm fine with the three audio related devices. But I still have the > following points: > > The name of the codec platform_device is "hdmi-audio-codec". Isn't that > too generic name? Shouldn't it be "omap-hdmi-audio-codec"? Then again, > you said in this case it represents the tv-set. If so, should it be a > generic codec driver, without any reference to omap? Yes, it could be a generic codec driver. However, I was envisioning that this component to further represent the TV-set by exposing the audio capabilities of the HDMI sink as represented in the EDID. For instance, exposing to ALSA only the sample rates supported by the sink even if the HDMI IP in the OMAP supports more than that. For this, I was planing to rely on omap_dss_get_device and omap_dss_driver.read_edid. Thus, the HDMI codec could not be generic unless there is a more generic support from the video drivers for this (framebuffer/drm maybe?). > > I still don't understand why the codec and machine drivers need to be > created in the board file. That just forces us to replicate the same > code for all OMAP boards that have OMAP HDMI output. Why not create the > devices in some common code, for example arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c? > > With DT this should be similar: OMAP's hdmi devices should be presented > in the omap4.dtsi file, not in each individual board dts. Although the > DT data should represent the hardware, and if the code and machine > devices are not really there in the HW, then... I don't know =). > > And something that confuses me: sound/soc/codecs/omap-hdmi.c contains a > codec and dai drivers, but sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c also contains a > dai driver. The latter actually contains two dai drivers, the other a > platform driver and the other a snd_soc_dai_driver. But I guess this is > asoc details, and not relevant to this disuccsion =). As Mark, pointed out, there is an interface on each end of the link. BR, Ricardo > > Tomi > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Tomi, Mark, On 11/19/2012 07:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> I still don't understand why the codec and machine drivers need to be >> created in the board file. That just forces us to replicate the same >> code for all OMAP boards that have OMAP HDMI output. Why not create the >> devices in some common code, for example arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c? > > Yes, this would be more sensible if there's no board specifics involved. I think they are truly board-specific. For instance, there could be some board that does not have the OMAP HDMI IP wired to an external connector. We don't want the drivers to be probed in that case. If they are in common code, the devices will be created even if a board does not have HDMI output. > >> With DT this should be similar: OMAP's hdmi devices should be presented >> in the omap4.dtsi file, not in each individual board dts. Although the >> DT data should represent the hardware, and if the code and machine >> devices are not really there in the HW, then... I don't know =). > > Well, in a case like this where the sound card is essentially autoprobed > based on the detection of the hardware at runtime the sound card > probably shouldn't appear in the device tree at all - you'll probably > want something to say there's a physical HDMI port it's worth looking at > there but everything else should be figured out at runtime. Yes, I was planning to rely on the DSS DT entries in the omap4.dtsi file. However, no HDMI audio support should be probed if the board does not have an HDMI connector. Also, the TPD chip should appear on the Pandaboard/SDP4430 dts files. Only if both conditions are met, probe the HDMI audio drivers, this conditions will be checked at run time by the ASoC HDMI machine driver. Something like this: sound_hdmi { compatible = "ti,omap-hdmi-card-audio"; ti,model = "OMAP4HDMI"; ti,hdmi_audio = <&hdmi>; ti,level_shifter = <&tpd12s015>; }; The ASoC machine driver would create the platform device for the HDMI codec if the DT has the required nodes. > >> And something that confuses me: sound/soc/codecs/omap-hdmi.c contains a >> codec and dai drivers, but sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c also contains a >> dai driver. The latter actually contains two dai drivers, the other a >> platform driver and the other a snd_soc_dai_driver. But I guess this is >> asoc details, and not relevant to this disuccsion =). > > There's an interaface on each end of the link, they're wired together to > communicate between the two devices. BR, Ricardo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:20:00PM -0600, Ricardo Neri wrote: > On 11/19/2012 07:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >Yes, this would be more sensible if there's no board specifics involved. > I think they are truly board-specific. For instance, there could be > some board that does not have the OMAP HDMI IP wired to an external > connector. We don't want the drivers to be probed in that case. If > they are in common code, the devices will be created even if a board > does not have HDMI output. That's just a case of having a flag in the platform data for the device saying "don't use this port" as opposed to having the entire ASoC device instantiation infrastructure in there which is rather Linux specific. > Something like this: > sound_hdmi { > compatible = "ti,omap-hdmi-card-audio"; > ti,model = "OMAP4HDMI"; > ti,hdmi_audio = <&hdmi>; > ti,level_shifter = <&tpd12s015>; > }; > The ASoC machine driver would create the platform device for the > HDMI codec if the DT has the required nodes. Why not just make this a property of the main HDMI controller - the compatible property here looks like it's describing the Linux specifics not the hardware?
On 2012-11-22 02:20, Ricardo Neri wrote: > Hi Tomi, Mark, > > On 11/19/2012 07:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> >>> I still don't understand why the codec and machine drivers need to be >>> created in the board file. That just forces us to replicate the same >>> code for all OMAP boards that have OMAP HDMI output. Why not create the >>> devices in some common code, for example arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c? >> >> Yes, this would be more sensible if there's no board specifics involved. > > I think they are truly board-specific. For instance, there could be some I don't =). > board that does not have the OMAP HDMI IP wired to an external > connector. We don't want the drivers to be probed in that case. If they > are in common code, the devices will be created even if a board does not > have HDMI output. The HDMI devices are still there in the HW even if we don't have a HDMI connector. I don't see any problem with probing the HDMI audio driver even in that case. But of course the user space shouldn't see a usable HDMI display/audio if there's no connector. For display side this is managed so that the HDMI IP driver is always loaded, but a HDMI panel driver is only there if the board file tells that we have a connector. I guess this could be optimized by having a "disabled" flag for HDMI IP driver, so that it wouldn't even need to allocate any private data structures of such. But the savings would be quite minimal. >>> With DT this should be similar: OMAP's hdmi devices should be presented >>> in the omap4.dtsi file, not in each individual board dts. Although the >>> DT data should represent the hardware, and if the code and machine >>> devices are not really there in the HW, then... I don't know =). >> >> Well, in a case like this where the sound card is essentially autoprobed >> based on the detection of the hardware at runtime the sound card >> probably shouldn't appear in the device tree at all - you'll probably >> want something to say there's a physical HDMI port it's worth looking at >> there but everything else should be figured out at runtime. > > Yes, I was planning to rely on the DSS DT entries in the omap4.dtsi > file. However, no HDMI audio support should be probed if the board does > not have an HDMI connector. Also, the TPD chip should appear on the > Pandaboard/SDP4430 dts files. Only if both conditions are met, probe the > HDMI audio drivers, this conditions will be checked at run time by the > ASoC HDMI machine driver. > > Something like this: > > sound_hdmi { > compatible = "ti,omap-hdmi-card-audio"; > ti,model = "OMAP4HDMI"; > > ti,hdmi_audio = <&hdmi>; > ti,level_shifter = <&tpd12s015>; > }; > > The ASoC machine driver would create the platform device for the HDMI > codec if the DT has the required nodes. The TPD chip really shouldn't be here in. It's an external component, not related to audio in any way. I think the HDMI audio driver should be only concerned about the HDMI IP. The HDMI IP video driver shouldn't care about TPD chip either, but for now we need to manage it somewhere, and that's the easiest place for it. So... I'm not sure how this should be managed, but I am 99% sure that there's nothing board specific with HDMI audio, and thus it should be managed in common .c files in arch code or dss code, or .dts files. If we add the hdmi display in the .dts files, I think the audio should just work. Or is there something in ASoC that forces us to represent it in the .dts? I don't think there's really anything related to HW to describe there related to HDMI audio. If we have HDMI video output, we also have the audio, as simple as that. Tomi
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Or is there something in ASoC that forces us to represent it in the > .dts? I don't think there's really anything related to HW to describe There shouldn't be.
Hi Mark, On 11/21/2012 07:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:20:00PM -0600, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> On 11/19/2012 07:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Yes, this would be more sensible if there's no board specifics involved. > >> I think they are truly board-specific. For instance, there could be >> some board that does not have the OMAP HDMI IP wired to an external >> connector. We don't want the drivers to be probed in that case. If >> they are in common code, the devices will be created even if a board >> does not have HDMI output. > > That's just a case of having a flag in the platform data for the device > saying "don't use this port" Ok. I guess I can put code so that the devices for ASoC are created only if there are HDMI displays in the omapdss_board_info.devices array. > as opposed to having the entire ASoC device > instantiation infrastructure in there which is rather Linux specific. But the board files are only for Linux, right? The ASoC drivers will always be initialized anyways. They will reach probe only if the devices are present. > >> Something like this: > >> sound_hdmi { >> compatible = "ti,omap-hdmi-card-audio"; >> ti,model = "OMAP4HDMI"; > >> ti,hdmi_audio = <&hdmi>; >> ti,level_shifter = <&tpd12s015>; >> }; > >> The ASoC machine driver would create the platform device for the >> HDMI codec if the DT has the required nodes. > > Why not just make this a property of the main HDMI controller - the > compatible property here looks like it's describing the Linux specifics > not the hardware? I see. So it seems that there will be nothing to add for DT support for HDMI from ASoC. Display code is able to take care of it. BTW, thanks for pointing out the issue with the compatible property, I have not noticed it. BR, Ricardo > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/22/2012 06:52 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2012-11-22 02:20, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> Hi Tomi, Mark, >> >> On 11/19/2012 07:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>> >>>> I still don't understand why the codec and machine drivers need to be >>>> created in the board file. That just forces us to replicate the same >>>> code for all OMAP boards that have OMAP HDMI output. Why not create the >>>> devices in some common code, for example arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c? >>> >>> Yes, this would be more sensible if there's no board specifics involved. >> >> I think they are truly board-specific. For instance, there could be some > > I don't =). > >> board that does not have the OMAP HDMI IP wired to an external >> connector. We don't want the drivers to be probed in that case. If they >> are in common code, the devices will be created even if a board does not >> have HDMI output. > > The HDMI devices are still there in the HW even if we don't have a HDMI > connector. I don't see any problem with probing the HDMI audio driver > even in that case. > > But of course the user space shouldn't see a usable HDMI display/audio > if there's no connector. For display side this is managed so that the > HDMI IP driver is always loaded, but a HDMI panel driver is only there > if the board file tells that we have a connector. > > I guess this could be optimized by having a "disabled" flag for HDMI IP > driver, so that it wouldn't even need to allocate any private data > structures of such. But the savings would be quite minimal. Maybe, just create the devices for ASoC only if it sees a HDMI dss device in the omapdss_board_info? > >>>> With DT this should be similar: OMAP's hdmi devices should be presented >>>> in the omap4.dtsi file, not in each individual board dts. Although the >>>> DT data should represent the hardware, and if the code and machine >>>> devices are not really there in the HW, then... I don't know =). >>> >>> Well, in a case like this where the sound card is essentially autoprobed >>> based on the detection of the hardware at runtime the sound card >>> probably shouldn't appear in the device tree at all - you'll probably >>> want something to say there's a physical HDMI port it's worth looking at >>> there but everything else should be figured out at runtime. >> >> Yes, I was planning to rely on the DSS DT entries in the omap4.dtsi >> file. However, no HDMI audio support should be probed if the board does >> not have an HDMI connector. Also, the TPD chip should appear on the >> Pandaboard/SDP4430 dts files. Only if both conditions are met, probe the >> HDMI audio drivers, this conditions will be checked at run time by the >> ASoC HDMI machine driver. >> >> Something like this: >> >> sound_hdmi { >> compatible = "ti,omap-hdmi-card-audio"; >> ti,model = "OMAP4HDMI"; >> >> ti,hdmi_audio = <&hdmi>; >> ti,level_shifter = <&tpd12s015>; >> }; >> >> The ASoC machine driver would create the platform device for the HDMI >> codec if the DT has the required nodes. > > The TPD chip really shouldn't be here in. It's an external component, > not related to audio in any way. I think the HDMI audio driver should be > only concerned about the HDMI IP. OK. So display code will handle all the DT details for the audio drivers to use. > The HDMI IP video driver shouldn't > care about TPD chip either, but for now we need to manage it somewhere, > and that's the easiest place for it. BTW, I have a draft for this, but more urgent things have been consuming my bandwidth. :/ BR, Ricardo > > So... I'm not sure how this should be managed, but I am 99% sure that > there's nothing board specific with HDMI audio, and thus it should be > managed in common .c files in arch code or dss code, or .dts files. If > we add the hdmi display in the .dts files, I think the audio should just > work. > > Or is there something in ASoC that forces us to represent it in the > .dts? I don't think there's really anything related to HW to describe > there related to HDMI audio. If we have HDMI video output, we also have > the audio, as simple as that. > > Tomi > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:03:53PM -0600, Ricardo Neri wrote: > On 11/21/2012 07:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >instantiation infrastructure in there which is rather Linux specific. > But the board files are only for Linux, right? The ASoC drivers will > always be initialized anyways. They will reach probe only if the > devices are present. Could you be more specific please?
On 11/22/2012 08:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:03:53PM -0600, Ricardo Neri wrote: >> On 11/21/2012 07:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> instantiation infrastructure in there which is rather Linux specific. > >> But the board files are only for Linux, right? The ASoC drivers will >> always be initialized anyways. They will reach probe only if the >> devices are present. > > Could you be more specific please? > Sorry, I meant that the drivers will try to register anyways. The will only probe if there is a matching device for them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c index 3669c12..97bdff3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c @@ -388,6 +388,11 @@ static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec = { .id = -1, }; +static struct platform_device sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card = { + .name = "omap-hdmi-audio-card", + .id = -1, +}; + static struct omap_abe_twl6040_data sdp4430_abe_audio_data = { .card_name = "SDP4430", .has_hs = ABE_TWL6040_LEFT | ABE_TWL6040_RIGHT, @@ -423,6 +428,7 @@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_devices[] __initdata = { &sdp4430_dmic_codec, &sdp4430_abe_audio, &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_codec, + &sdp4430_hdmi_audio_card, }; static struct omap_musb_board_data musb_board_data = { diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c index bfcd397..e03eae1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c @@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ static struct platform_device panda_hdmi_audio_codec = { .id = -1, }; +static struct platform_device panda_hdmi_audio_card = { + .name = "omap-hdmi-audio-card", + .id = -1, +}; + static struct platform_device btwilink_device = { .name = "btwilink", .id = -1, @@ -141,6 +146,7 @@ static struct platform_device *panda_devices[] __initdata = { &wl1271_device, &panda_abe_audio, &panda_hdmi_audio_codec, + &panda_hdmi_audio_card, &btwilink_device, }; diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c index 417a87d..bea0b40 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c @@ -352,22 +352,6 @@ static void __init omap_init_dmic(void) static inline void omap_init_dmic(void) {} #endif -#if defined(CONFIG_SND_OMAP_SOC_OMAP_HDMI) || \ - defined(CONFIG_SND_OMAP_SOC_OMAP_HDMI_MODULE) - -static struct platform_device omap_hdmi_audio = { - .name = "omap-hdmi-audio", - .id = -1, -}; - -static void __init omap_init_hdmi_audio(void) -{ - platform_device_register(&omap_hdmi_audio); -} -#else -static inline void omap_init_hdmi_audio(void) {} -#endif - #if defined(CONFIG_SPI_OMAP24XX) || defined(CONFIG_SPI_OMAP24XX_MODULE) #include <linux/platform_data/spi-omap2-mcspi.h> @@ -613,7 +597,6 @@ static int __init omap2_init_devices(void) */ omap_init_audio(); omap_init_camera(); - omap_init_hdmi_audio(); omap_init_mbox(); /* If dtb is there, the devices will be created dynamically */ if (!of_have_populated_dt()) { diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c index 6d48026..c5743e1 100644 --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static int hdmi_probe_audio(struct platform_device *pdev) aud_res[1].start = res->start; /* create platform device for HDMI audio driver */ - aud_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("omap-hdmi-audio-dai", + aud_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("omap-hdmi-audio", pdev->id, aud_res, ARRAY_SIZE(aud_res)); if (IS_ERR(aud_pdev)) { diff --git a/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c b/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c index eaa2ea0..07b9959 100644 --- a/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c +++ b/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c @@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ #include <asm/mach-types.h> #include <video/omapdss.h> -#define DRV_NAME "omap-hdmi-audio" +#define DRV_NAME "omap-hdmi-audio-card" static struct snd_soc_dai_link omap_hdmi_dai = { .name = "HDMI", .stream_name = "HDMI", - .cpu_dai_name = "omap-hdmi-audio-dai", + .cpu_dai_name = "omap-hdmi-audio", .platform_name = "omap-pcm-audio", .codec_name = "hdmi-audio-codec", .codec_dai_name = "omap-hdmi-hifi", diff --git a/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c b/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c index 8034cf7..33418fc 100644 --- a/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c +++ b/sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ #include "omap-pcm.h" #include "omap-hdmi.h" -#define DRV_NAME "omap-hdmi-audio-dai" +#define DRV_NAME "omap-hdmi-audio" struct hdmi_priv { struct omap_pcm_dma_data dma_params;
This relocates and renames the platform devices for ASoC HDMI drivers to give them a more logical structure. The previous omap-hdmi-audio device is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio-card and is relocated to the SDP4430 and Pandaboard board files. This is to better illustrate the fact that it describes the whole HDMI audio functionality on such boards, including the companion chip. The previous omap-hdmi-audio-dai is renamed as omap-hdmi-audio. The -dai part is removed to not have references to ASoC concepts in the OMAPDSS HDMI driver. Also, as it will be used by the ASoC HDMI CPU DAI driver, the name refers only to OMAP HDMI audio functionality, irrespective of the board. The names of the ASoC drivers are also updated accordingly. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 6 ++++++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 17 ----------------- drivers/video/omap2/dss/hdmi.c | 2 +- sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi-card.c | 4 ++-- sound/soc/omap/omap-hdmi.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)