| Message ID | 1353578419-5481-1-git-send-email-s.priebe@profihost.ag (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> wrote: > This one fixes a race which qemu had also in iscsi block driver > between cancellation and io completition. > > qemu_rbd_aio_cancel was not synchronously waiting for the end of > the command. > > To archieve this it introduces a new status flag which uses > -EINPROGRESS. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> > --- > block/rbd.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c > index 0384c6c..783c3d7 100644 > --- a/block/rbd.c > +++ b/block/rbd.c > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ typedef struct RBDAIOCB { > int error; > struct BDRVRBDState *s; > int cancelled; > + int status; > } RBDAIOCB; > > typedef struct RADOSCB { > @@ -376,12 +377,6 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) > RBDAIOCB *acb = rcb->acb; > int64_t r; > > - if (acb->cancelled) { > - qemu_vfree(acb->bounce); > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > - goto done; > - } > - > r = rcb->ret; > > if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE || > @@ -406,10 +401,11 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) > acb->ret = r; > } > } > + acb->status = 0; > + > /* Note that acb->bh can be NULL in case where the aio was cancelled */ > acb->bh = qemu_bh_new(rbd_aio_bh_cb, acb); > qemu_bh_schedule(acb->bh); > -done: > g_free(rcb); > } > > @@ -574,6 +570,12 @@ static void qemu_rbd_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *blockacb) > { > RBDAIOCB *acb = (RBDAIOCB *) blockacb; > acb->cancelled = 1; > + > + while (acb->status == -EINPROGRESS) { > + qemu_aio_wait(); > + } > + > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > } > > static AIOPool rbd_aio_pool = { > @@ -646,7 +648,8 @@ static void rbd_aio_bh_cb(void *opaque) > qemu_bh_delete(acb->bh); > acb->bh = NULL; > > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > + if (!acb->cancelled) Missing braces, please read CODING_STYLE. > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > } > > static int rbd_aio_discard_wrapper(rbd_image_t image, > @@ -691,6 +694,7 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > acb->s = s; > acb->cancelled = 0; > acb->bh = NULL; > + acb->status = -EINPROGRESS; > > if (cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE) { > qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size); > @@ -737,7 +741,8 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > failed: > g_free(rcb); > s->qemu_aio_count--; > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > + if (!acb->cancelled) > + qemu_aio_release(acb); Also here. > return NULL; > } > > -- > 1.7.10.4 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Am 24.11.2012 20:54, schrieb Blue Swirl: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> wrote: >> This one fixes a race which qemu had also in iscsi block driver >> between cancellation and io completition. >> >> qemu_rbd_aio_cancel was not synchronously waiting for the end of >> the command. >> >> To archieve this it introduces a new status flag which uses >> -EINPROGRESS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> ... >> >> - qemu_aio_release(acb); >> + if (!acb->cancelled) > > Missing braces, please read CODING_STYLE. Will fix this if the rest is OK. Waiting for Stefan and Paolo. Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/22/2012 02:00 AM, Stefan Priebe wrote: > This one fixes a race which qemu had also in iscsi block driver > between cancellation and io completition. > > qemu_rbd_aio_cancel was not synchronously waiting for the end of > the command. > > To archieve this it introduces a new status flag which uses > -EINPROGRESS. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> > --- > block/rbd.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c > index 0384c6c..783c3d7 100644 > --- a/block/rbd.c > +++ b/block/rbd.c > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ typedef struct RBDAIOCB { > int error; > struct BDRVRBDState *s; > int cancelled; > + int status; > } RBDAIOCB; > > typedef struct RADOSCB { > @@ -376,12 +377,6 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) > RBDAIOCB *acb = rcb->acb; > int64_t r; > > - if (acb->cancelled) { > - qemu_vfree(acb->bounce); > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > - goto done; > - } > - > r = rcb->ret; > > if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE || > @@ -406,10 +401,11 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) > acb->ret = r; > } > } > + acb->status = 0; > + > /* Note that acb->bh can be NULL in case where the aio was cancelled */ > acb->bh = qemu_bh_new(rbd_aio_bh_cb, acb); > qemu_bh_schedule(acb->bh); > -done: > g_free(rcb); > } > > @@ -574,6 +570,12 @@ static void qemu_rbd_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *blockacb) > { > RBDAIOCB *acb = (RBDAIOCB *) blockacb; > acb->cancelled = 1; > + > + while (acb->status == -EINPROGRESS) { > + qemu_aio_wait(); > + } > + There should be a qemu_vfree(acb->bounce); here > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > } > > static AIOPool rbd_aio_pool = { > @@ -646,7 +648,8 @@ static void rbd_aio_bh_cb(void *opaque) > qemu_bh_delete(acb->bh); > acb->bh = NULL; > > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > + if (!acb->cancelled) > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > } > > static int rbd_aio_discard_wrapper(rbd_image_t image, > @@ -691,6 +694,7 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > acb->s = s; > acb->cancelled = 0; > acb->bh = NULL; > + acb->status = -EINPROGRESS; > > if (cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE) { > qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size); > @@ -737,7 +741,8 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > failed: > g_free(rcb); > s->qemu_aio_count--; > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > + if (!acb->cancelled) qemu_vfree(acb->bounce) should be here as well, although that's a separate bug that's probably never hit. > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > return NULL; > } > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:00:19AM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote: > @@ -406,10 +401,11 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) > acb->ret = r; > } > } > + acb->status = 0; > + I suggest doing this in the BH. The qemu_aio_wait() loop in qemu_rbd_aio_cancel() needs to wait until the BH has executed. By clearing status in the BH we ensure that no matter in which order qemu_aio_wait() invokes BHs and callbacks, we'll always wait until the BH has completed before ending the while loop in qemu_rbd_aio_cancel(). > @@ -737,7 +741,8 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > failed: > g_free(rcb); > s->qemu_aio_count--; > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > + if (!acb->cancelled) > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > return NULL; > } This scenario is impossible. We haven't returned the acb back to the caller yet so they could not have invoked qemu_aio_cancel(). Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, i hope i've done everything correctly. I've send a new v4 patch. Am 29.11.2012 14:58, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:00:19AM +0100, Stefan Priebe wrote: >> @@ -406,10 +401,11 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) >> acb->ret = r; >> } >> } >> + acb->status = 0; >> + > > I suggest doing this in the BH. The qemu_aio_wait() loop in > qemu_rbd_aio_cancel() needs to wait until the BH has executed. By > clearing status in the BH we ensure that no matter in which order > qemu_aio_wait() invokes BHs and callbacks, we'll always wait until the > BH has completed before ending the while loop in qemu_rbd_aio_cancel(). > >> @@ -737,7 +741,8 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, >> failed: >> g_free(rcb); >> s->qemu_aio_count--; >> - qemu_aio_release(acb); >> + if (!acb->cancelled) >> + qemu_aio_release(acb); >> return NULL; >> } > > This scenario is impossible. We haven't returned the acb back to the > caller yet so they could not have invoked qemu_aio_cancel(). Greets, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > @@ -574,6 +570,12 @@ static void > > qemu_rbd_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *blockacb) > > { > > RBDAIOCB *acb = (RBDAIOCB *) blockacb; > > acb->cancelled = 1; > > + > > + while (acb->status == -EINPROGRESS) { > > + qemu_aio_wait(); > > + } > > + > > There should be a qemu_vfree(acb->bounce); here No, because the BH will have run at this point and you'd doubly-free the buffer. Paolo > > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > > } > > > > static AIOPool rbd_aio_pool = { > > @@ -646,7 +648,8 @@ static void rbd_aio_bh_cb(void *opaque) > > qemu_bh_delete(acb->bh); > > acb->bh = NULL; > > > > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > > + if (!acb->cancelled) > > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > > } > > > > static int rbd_aio_discard_wrapper(rbd_image_t image, > > @@ -691,6 +694,7 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB > > *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > > acb->s = s; > > acb->cancelled = 0; > > acb->bh = NULL; > > + acb->status = -EINPROGRESS; > > > > if (cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE) { > > qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size); > > @@ -737,7 +741,8 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB > > *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, > > failed: > > g_free(rcb); > > s->qemu_aio_count--; > > - qemu_aio_release(acb); > > + if (!acb->cancelled) > > qemu_vfree(acb->bounce) should be here as well, although that's a > separate bug that's probably never hit. > > > + qemu_aio_release(acb); > > return NULL; > > } > > > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c index 0384c6c..783c3d7 100644 --- a/block/rbd.c +++ b/block/rbd.c @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ typedef struct RBDAIOCB { int error; struct BDRVRBDState *s; int cancelled; + int status; } RBDAIOCB; typedef struct RADOSCB { @@ -376,12 +377,6 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) RBDAIOCB *acb = rcb->acb; int64_t r; - if (acb->cancelled) { - qemu_vfree(acb->bounce); - qemu_aio_release(acb); - goto done; - } - r = rcb->ret; if (acb->cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE || @@ -406,10 +401,11 @@ static void qemu_rbd_complete_aio(RADOSCB *rcb) acb->ret = r; } } + acb->status = 0; + /* Note that acb->bh can be NULL in case where the aio was cancelled */ acb->bh = qemu_bh_new(rbd_aio_bh_cb, acb); qemu_bh_schedule(acb->bh); -done: g_free(rcb); } @@ -574,6 +570,12 @@ static void qemu_rbd_aio_cancel(BlockDriverAIOCB *blockacb) { RBDAIOCB *acb = (RBDAIOCB *) blockacb; acb->cancelled = 1; + + while (acb->status == -EINPROGRESS) { + qemu_aio_wait(); + } + + qemu_aio_release(acb); } static AIOPool rbd_aio_pool = { @@ -646,7 +648,8 @@ static void rbd_aio_bh_cb(void *opaque) qemu_bh_delete(acb->bh); acb->bh = NULL; - qemu_aio_release(acb); + if (!acb->cancelled) + qemu_aio_release(acb); } static int rbd_aio_discard_wrapper(rbd_image_t image, @@ -691,6 +694,7 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, acb->s = s; acb->cancelled = 0; acb->bh = NULL; + acb->status = -EINPROGRESS; if (cmd == RBD_AIO_WRITE) { qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size); @@ -737,7 +741,8 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *rbd_start_aio(BlockDriverState *bs, failed: g_free(rcb); s->qemu_aio_count--; - qemu_aio_release(acb); + if (!acb->cancelled) + qemu_aio_release(acb); return NULL; }
This one fixes a race which qemu had also in iscsi block driver between cancellation and io completition. qemu_rbd_aio_cancel was not synchronously waiting for the end of the command. To archieve this it introduces a new status flag which uses -EINPROGRESS. Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> --- block/rbd.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)