| Message ID | CANM98qLNMTw5DGBJLPhXrMs_p5mvphxiEisrz4pLnMFpmm_eCQ@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:40:37PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > > > > Why are PIPT caches affected by this? The virtual address is irrelevant. > > > > The comment is slightly misleading, and I'll update it. Just so we're > clear, this is the culprit: > > 1. guest uses page X, containing instruction A > 2. page X gets swapped out > 3. host uses page X, containing instruction B > 4. instruction B enters i-cache at page X's cache line > 5. page X gets swapped out > 6. guest swaps page X back in > 7. guest executes instruction B from cache, should execute instruction A Ok, that's clearer. Thanks for the explanation. > The point is that with PIPT we can flush only that page from the > icache using the host virtual address, as the MMU will do the > translation on the fly. In the VIPT we have to nuke the whole thing > (unless we . Unless we what? Could we flush using the host VA + all virtual aliases instead? > >> + * (or another VM) may have used this page at the same virtual address > >> + * as this guest, and we read incorrect data from the icache. If > >> + * we're using a PIPT cache, we can invalidate just that page, but if > >> + * we are using a VIPT cache we need to invalidate the entire icache - > >> + * damn shame - as written in the ARM ARM (DDI 0406C - Page B3-1384) > >> + */ > >> + if (icache_is_pipt()) { > >> + unsigned long hva = gfn_to_hva(kvm, gfn); > >> + __cpuc_coherent_user_range(hva, hva + PAGE_SIZE); > >> + } else if (!icache_is_vivt_asid_tagged()) { > >> + /* any kind of VIPT cache */ > >> + __flush_icache_all(); > >> + } > > > > so what if it *is* vivt_asid_tagged? Surely that necessitates nuking the > > thing, unless it's VMID tagged as well (does that even exist?). > > > > see page B3-1392 in the ARM ARM, if it's vivt_asid_tagged it is also > vmid tagged. Great. > >> + write_fault = false; > >> + else > >> + write_fault = true; > >> + > >> + if (fault_status == FSC_PERM && !write_fault) { > >> + kvm_err("Unexpected L2 read permission error\n"); > >> + return -EFAULT; > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* We need minimum second+third level pages */ > >> + ret = mmu_topup_memory_cache(memcache, 2, KVM_NR_MEM_OBJS); > >> + if (ret) > >> + return ret; > >> + > >> + mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq; > >> + smp_rmb(); > > > > What's this barrier for and why isn't there a write barrier paired with > > it? > > > > The read barrier is to ensure that mmu_notifier_seq is read before we > call gfn_to_pfn_prot (which is essentially get_user_pages), so that we > don't get a page which is unmapped by an MMU notifier before we grab > the spinlock that we would never see. I also added a comment > explaining it in the patch below. > > There is a write barrier paired with it, see virt/kvm/kvm_main.c, > specifically kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_page (the spin_unlock), and > kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end. Ok, so it sounds like a homebrew seqlock implementatiom. Any reason KVM isn't just using those directly? Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:40:37PM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote: >> > >> > Why are PIPT caches affected by this? The virtual address is irrelevant. >> > >> >> The comment is slightly misleading, and I'll update it. Just so we're >> clear, this is the culprit: >> >> 1. guest uses page X, containing instruction A >> 2. page X gets swapped out >> 3. host uses page X, containing instruction B >> 4. instruction B enters i-cache at page X's cache line >> 5. page X gets swapped out >> 6. guest swaps page X back in >> 7. guest executes instruction B from cache, should execute instruction A > > Ok, that's clearer. Thanks for the explanation. > >> The point is that with PIPT we can flush only that page from the >> icache using the host virtual address, as the MMU will do the >> translation on the fly. In the VIPT we have to nuke the whole thing >> (unless we . > > Unless we what? Could we flush using the host VA + all virtual aliases > instead? > you'd have to know all the virtual addresses of the guest(s) mapping that physical page and then flush all the aliases of those addresses, which we don't know at this time. What we can do (down the road) is to mark the pages as XN, and catch the fault, get the virtual fault address, and then flush that single page. The tradeoffs need to be measured before implementing this imho, and is an optimization we can add later. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h index 499e7b0..421a20b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h @@ -35,4 +35,16 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_memory_caches(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); phys_addr_t kvm_mmu_get_httbr(void); int kvm_mmu_init(void); void kvm_clear_hyp_idmap(void); + +static inline bool kvm_is_write_fault(unsigned long hsr) +{ + unsigned long hsr_ec = hsr >> HSR_EC_SHIFT; + if (hsr_ec == HSR_EC_IABT) + return false; + else if ((hsr & HSR_ISV) && !(hsr & HSR_WNR)) + return false; + else + return true; +} + #endif /* __ARM_KVM_MMU_H__ */ diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c index 50deb74..503aa0f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c @@ -497,11 +497,14 @@ static void coherent_icache_guest_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn) /* * If we are going to insert an instruction page and the icache is * either VIPT or PIPT, there is a potential problem where the host - * (or another VM) may have used this page at the same virtual address - * as this guest, and we read incorrect data from the icache. If - * we're using a PIPT cache, we can invalidate just that page, but if - * we are using a VIPT cache we need to invalidate the entire icache - - * damn shame - as written in the ARM ARM (DDI 0406C - Page B3-1384) + * (or another VM) may have used the same page as this guest, and we + * read incorrect data from the icache. If we're using a PIPT cache, + * we can invalidate just that page, but if we are using a VIPT cache + * we need to invalidate the entire icache - damn shame - as written + * in the ARM ARM (DDI 0406C.b - Page B3-1393). + * + * VIVT caches are tagged using both the ASID and the VMID and doesn't + * need any kind of flushing (DDI 0406C.b - Page B3-1392). */ if (icache_is_pipt()) {