| Message ID | 1355725087-11363-4-git-send-email-hdoyu@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > #include <linux/jiffies.h> > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > > #include <asm/cacheflush.h> > #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> > @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ > > extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void); > > -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE); > +static void __iomem *scu_base; > > #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \ > (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100) > @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done: > return status; > } > > +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = { > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, > + {} > +}; > + > /* > * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs > * which may be present or become present in the system. > */ > static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) > { > - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); > + struct device_node *np; > + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; > + > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); > + if (!np) > + return; > + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core count from DT went into 3.8. BTW, you can get the scu address on the A9 by reading cp15 register: /* Get SCU base */ asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base)); It's still probably good to have the DT node, but the reg property can be optional in this case. We need to move away from having the DT matching code within the platforms. This should all be moved to the scu code in a scu_of_init function that could be called from common code. Rob > + if (!scu_base) > + return; > > + ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); > if (ncores > nr_cpu_ids) { > pr_warn("SMP: %u cores greater than maximum (%u), clipping\n", > ncores, nr_cpu_ids); > @@ -166,7 +182,8 @@ static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) > static void __init tegra_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) > { > tegra_cpu_reset_handler_init(); > - scu_enable(scu_base); > + if (scu_base) > + scu_enable(scu_base); > } > > struct smp_operations tegra_smp_ops __initdata = { >
On 12/17/2012 07:00 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: >> Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c >> static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) >> { >> - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); >> + struct device_node *np; >> + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; >> + >> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); >> + if (!np) >> + return; >> + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > > Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not > work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get > the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to > get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core > count from DT went into 3.8. Does it work if the machine's .map_io() function has set up a static mapping that includes the specified region? I believe that is the case on Tegra. What is the alternative if the registers can't be mapped; should the code count the number of child nodes in /cpus?
Hi Rob, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote @ Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:46 +0100: > On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > > #include <linux/jiffies.h> > > #include <linux/smp.h> > > #include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > > > > #include <asm/cacheflush.h> > > #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> > > @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ > > > > extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void); > > > > -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE); > > +static void __iomem *scu_base; > > > > #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \ > > (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100) > > @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done: > > return status; > > } > > > > +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = { > > + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, > > + {} > > +}; > > + > > /* > > * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs > > * which may be present or become present in the system. > > */ > > static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) > > { > > - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); > > + struct device_node *np; > > + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; > > + > > + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); > > + if (!np) > > + return; > > + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > > Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not > work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get > the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to > get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core > count from DT went into 3.8. > > BTW, you can get the scu address on the A9 by reading cp15 register: > > /* Get SCU base */ > asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base)); > > It's still probably good to have the DT node, but the reg property can > be optional in this case. I'm simply wondering, if the above cp15 works with Cortex-A9, do we still need SCU DT node? At least from Cortex-A15 TRM, it seems that SCU is tighly integrated into CPU core and it doesn't have any user control. So Cortex-A15 doesn't seem to need to configure SCU. For Cortex-A7, I haven't yet found S/W configurable register definitions in TRM. So if neither of A15/A7 need SCU base, would the above cp15 intructions be enough? > We need to move away from having the DT matching code within the > platforms. This should all be moved to the scu code in a scu_of_init > function that could be called from common code. True if SCU DT node is still necessary.
On 12/18/2012 03:21 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote @ Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:46 +0100: > >> On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: >>> Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c >>> index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c >>> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ >>> #include <linux/jiffies.h> >>> #include <linux/smp.h> >>> #include <linux/io.h> >>> +#include <linux/of.h> >>> +#include <linux/of_address.h> >>> >>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> >>> #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> >>> @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ >>> >>> extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void); >>> >>> -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE); >>> +static void __iomem *scu_base; >>> >>> #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \ >>> (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100) >>> @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done: >>> return status; >>> } >>> >>> +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = { >>> + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, >>> + {} >>> +}; >>> + >>> /* >>> * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs >>> * which may be present or become present in the system. >>> */ >>> static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) >>> { >>> - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); >>> + struct device_node *np; >>> + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; >>> + >>> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); >>> + if (!np) >>> + return; >>> + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); >> >> Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not >> work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get >> the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to >> get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core >> count from DT went into 3.8. >> >> BTW, you can get the scu address on the A9 by reading cp15 register: >> >> /* Get SCU base */ >> asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base)); >> >> It's still probably good to have the DT node, but the reg property can >> be optional in this case. > > I'm simply wondering, if the above cp15 works with Cortex-A9, do we > still need SCU DT node? At least from Cortex-A15 TRM, it seems that > SCU is tighly integrated into CPU core and it doesn't have any user > control. So Cortex-A15 doesn't seem to need to configure SCU. For > Cortex-A7, I haven't yet found S/W configurable register definitions > in TRM. So if neither of A15/A7 need SCU base, would the above cp15 > intructions be enough? The A15/A7 still have the register for the other peripherals like the GIC, but there are no SCU registers or other way to get a core count from the h/w. The DT node could be used to determine if you have an SCU or not. I just used the cpu node compatible value to determine that. >> We need to move away from having the DT matching code within the >> platforms. This should all be moved to the scu code in a scu_of_init >> function that could be called from common code. > > True if SCU DT node is still necessary. Well, reading the cp15 register and mapping the registers could be common code independent of DT. I'm not sure if there are non-A9 implementations of the SCU which don't have the cp15 register. Rob
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote @ Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:46:36 +0100: > On 12/18/2012 03:21 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote @ Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:46 +0100: > > > >> On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > >>> Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> > >>> --- > >>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > >>> index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644 > >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > >>> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > >>> #include <linux/jiffies.h> > >>> #include <linux/smp.h> > >>> #include <linux/io.h> > >>> +#include <linux/of.h> > >>> +#include <linux/of_address.h> > >>> > >>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> > >>> #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> > >>> @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ > >>> > >>> extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void); > >>> > >>> -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE); > >>> +static void __iomem *scu_base; > >>> > >>> #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \ > >>> (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100) > >>> @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done: > >>> return status; > >>> } > >>> > >>> +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = { > >>> + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, > >>> + {} > >>> +}; > >>> + > >>> /* > >>> * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs > >>> * which may be present or become present in the system. > >>> */ > >>> static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) > >>> { > >>> - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); > >>> + struct device_node *np; > >>> + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; > >>> + > >>> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); > >>> + if (!np) > >>> + return; > >>> + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > >> > >> Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not > >> work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get > >> the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to > >> get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core > >> count from DT went into 3.8. > >> > >> BTW, you can get the scu address on the A9 by reading cp15 register: > >> > >> /* Get SCU base */ > >> asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base)); > >> > >> It's still probably good to have the DT node, but the reg property can > >> be optional in this case. > > > > I'm simply wondering, if the above cp15 works with Cortex-A9, do we > > still need SCU DT node? At least from Cortex-A15 TRM, it seems that > > SCU is tighly integrated into CPU core and it doesn't have any user > > control. So Cortex-A15 doesn't seem to need to configure SCU. For > > Cortex-A7, I haven't yet found S/W configurable register definitions > > in TRM. So if neither of A15/A7 need SCU base, would the above cp15 > > intructions be enough? > > The A15/A7 still have the register for the other peripherals like the > GIC, but there are no SCU registers or other way to get a core count > from the h/w. > > The DT node could be used to determine if you have an SCU or not. I just > used the cpu node compatible value to determine that. Taking a look at A15 TRM again, it seems that A15 can get number of processors via(*1): asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : "=r" (l2ctlr)); At least, A15 is ok without SCU/DT to get the number of processors. I haven't found the above instruction in A7, but is there any way to get the number of core in A7? If both A15/A7 can get # of CPU cores via coprocessor instruction, what others should we take care of with DT node? *1: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0438e/BABBACEE.html > >> We need to move away from having the DT matching code within the > >> platforms. This should all be moved to the scu code in a scu_of_init > >> function that could be called from common code. > > > > True if SCU DT node is still necessary. > > Well, reading the cp15 register and mapping the registers could be > common code independent of DT. I'm not sure if there are non-A9 > implementations of the SCU which don't have the cp15 register.
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> wrote @ Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:15:46 +0200 (EET): > Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote @ Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:46:36 +0100: > > > On 12/18/2012 03:21 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > > Hi Rob, > > > > > > Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote @ Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:46 +0100: > > > > > >> On 12/17/2012 12:18 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > >>> Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> > > >>> --- > > >>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- > > >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > >>> index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644 > > >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c > > >>> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ > > >>> #include <linux/jiffies.h> > > >>> #include <linux/smp.h> > > >>> #include <linux/io.h> > > >>> +#include <linux/of.h> > > >>> +#include <linux/of_address.h> > > >>> > > >>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> > > >>> #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> > > >>> @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ > > >>> > > >>> extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void); > > >>> > > >>> -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE); > > >>> +static void __iomem *scu_base; > > >>> > > >>> #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \ > > >>> (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100) > > >>> @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done: > > >>> return status; > > >>> } > > >>> > > >>> +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = { > > >>> + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, > > >>> + {} > > >>> +}; > > >>> + > > >>> /* > > >>> * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs > > >>> * which may be present or become present in the system. > > >>> */ > > >>> static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) > > >>> { > > >>> - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); > > >>> + struct device_node *np; > > >>> + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; > > >>> + > > >>> + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); > > >>> + if (!np) > > >>> + return; > > >>> + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); > > >> > > >> Did you actually test this? Unless something changed, ioremap does not > > >> work this early. The only reason to have it mapped this early is to get > > >> the core count, but that doesn't work on A15 or A7. So we really need to > > >> get core count/mask in a standard way. At least some work to get core > > >> count from DT went into 3.8. > > >> > > >> BTW, you can get the scu address on the A9 by reading cp15 register: > > >> > > >> /* Get SCU base */ > > >> asm("mrc p15, 4, %0, c15, c0, 0" : "=r" (base)); > > >> > > >> It's still probably good to have the DT node, but the reg property can > > >> be optional in this case. > > > > > > I'm simply wondering, if the above cp15 works with Cortex-A9, do we > > > still need SCU DT node? At least from Cortex-A15 TRM, it seems that > > > SCU is tighly integrated into CPU core and it doesn't have any user > > > control. So Cortex-A15 doesn't seem to need to configure SCU. For > > > Cortex-A7, I haven't yet found S/W configurable register definitions > > > in TRM. So if neither of A15/A7 need SCU base, would the above cp15 > > > intructions be enough? > > > > The A15/A7 still have the register for the other peripherals like the > > GIC, but there are no SCU registers or other way to get a core count > > from the h/w. > > > > The DT node could be used to determine if you have an SCU or not. I just > > used the cpu node compatible value to determine that. > > Taking a look at A15 TRM again, it seems that A15 can get number of > processors via(*1): > > asm("mrc p15, 1, %0, c9, c0, 2\n" : "=r" (l2ctlr)); > > At least, A15 is ok without SCU/DT to get the number of processors. I > haven't found the above instruction in A7, but is there any way to get > the number of core in A7? L2CTLR can be used to detect # of cores for A7 as well: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0464e/BABBACEE.html > If both A15/A7 can get # of CPU cores via coprocessor instruction, > what others should we take care of with DT node? > > *1: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0438e/BABBACEE.html > > > >> We need to move away from having the DT matching code within the > > >> platforms. This should all be moved to the scu code in a scu_of_init > > >> function that could be called from common code. > > > > > > True if SCU DT node is still necessary. > > > > Well, reading the cp15 register and mapping the registers could be > > common code independent of DT. I'm not sure if there are non-A9 > > implementations of the SCU which don't have the cp15 register. > >
On 12/16/2012 11:18 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT.
Hiroshi, what's the status on this patch series? I think Rob had
comments/objections on patch 4; are you going to post an updated series,
or is this series replaced by patch 3 in your Tegra114 series?
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote @ Wed, 2 Jan 2013 20:02:53 +0100: > On 12/16/2012 11:18 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. > > Hiroshi, what's the status on this patch series? I think Rob had > comments/objections on patch 4; are you going to post an updated series, > or is this series replaced by patch 3 in your Tegra114 series? As Rob suggested, at least, SCU base address should be detected in common code, scu_of_init() even if DT /cpus is the primary way to detect # of cores. I'll repost later. This patch can be done independent of Tegra114 series.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c index 1b926df..45c0b79 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ #include <linux/jiffies.h> #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <asm/cacheflush.h> #include <asm/hardware/gic.h> @@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ extern void tegra_secondary_startup(void); -static void __iomem *scu_base = IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE); +static void __iomem *scu_base; #define EVP_CPU_RESET_VECTOR \ (IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_EXCEPTION_VECTORS_BASE) + 0x100) @@ -143,14 +145,28 @@ done: return status; } +static const struct of_device_id cortex_a9_scu_match[] __initconst = { + { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-scu", }, + {} +}; + /* * Initialise the CPU possible map early - this describes the CPUs * which may be present or become present in the system. */ static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) { - unsigned int i, ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); + struct device_node *np; + unsigned int i, ncores = 1; + + np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, cortex_a9_scu_match); + if (!np) + return; + scu_base = of_iomap(np, 0); + if (!scu_base) + return; + ncores = scu_get_core_count(scu_base); if (ncores > nr_cpu_ids) { pr_warn("SMP: %u cores greater than maximum (%u), clipping\n", ncores, nr_cpu_ids); @@ -166,7 +182,8 @@ static void __init tegra_smp_init_cpus(void) static void __init tegra_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) { tegra_cpu_reset_handler_init(); - scu_enable(scu_base); + if (scu_base) + scu_enable(scu_base); } struct smp_operations tegra_smp_ops __initdata = {
Set Snoop Control Unit(SCU) register base address dynamically from DT. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/mach-tegra/platsmp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)