Message ID | 6935441.WoipOdx2kz@vostro.rjw.lan (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:58:50PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, January 11, 2013 10:37:59 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:31:43PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > Subject: ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value. > > > > > > Since device_attach() returns 1 on success and 0 on failure, > > > the check against its return value in acpi_bus_device_attach() > > > should be reveresed. Make it so. > > > > Not sure if it matters but it returns 0 if no device was bound to a driver > > and -ENODEV in case of error. If we only want to terminate in case of > > error, following might be better. > > > > } else if (device_attach(&device->dev) < 0) { > > Yes, this check will be better. > > Which means that the patch is actually yours, so I've just added the changelog. :-) > Thanks! (and I've tested this, it works ;-)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_device_attac if (!acpi_match_device_ids(device, acpi_platform_device_ids)) { /* This is a known good platform device. */ acpi_create_platform_device(device); - } else if (device_attach(&device->dev)) { + } else if (device_attach(&device->dev) < 0) { status = AE_CTRL_DEPTH; } return status;