diff mbox

[1/2] spi: spi-gpio: Add checks for the dt properties

Message ID 1356645288-10110-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Maxime Ripard Dec. 27, 2012, 9:54 p.m. UTC
The bindings assumed that the gpios properties were always there, which
made the NO_TX and NO_RX mode not usable from device tree. Add extra
checks to make sure that the driver can work if either MOSI or MISO is
not used.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard Jan. 9, 2013, 8:37 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Grant,

On 27/12/2012 22:54, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The bindings assumed that the gpios properties were always there, which
> made the NO_TX and NO_RX mode not usable from device tree. Add extra
> checks to make sure that the driver can work if either MOSI or MISO is
> not used.

Can you give me your Acked-by on this, or do you have any comments on this?

Thanks,
Maxime
Maxime Ripard Jan. 22, 2013, 3:50 p.m. UTC | #2
On 09/01/2013 09:37, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On 27/12/2012 22:54, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> The bindings assumed that the gpios properties were always there, which
>> made the NO_TX and NO_RX mode not usable from device tree. Add extra
>> checks to make sure that the driver can work if either MOSI or MISO is
>> not used.
> 
> Can you give me your Acked-by on this, or do you have any comments on this?

Ping?
Grant Likely Feb. 5, 2013, 1:08 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:50:30 +0100, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2013 09:37, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On 27/12/2012 22:54, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> The bindings assumed that the gpios properties were always there, which
> >> made the NO_TX and NO_RX mode not usable from device tree. Add extra
> >> checks to make sure that the driver can work if either MOSI or MISO is
> >> not used.
> > 
> > Can you give me your Acked-by on this, or do you have any comments on this?
> 
> Ping?

Mark has applied it and it is now in my tree.

g.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
index c7cf0b7..9ddef55 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-gpio.c
@@ -365,9 +365,26 @@  static int spi_gpio_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!pdata)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	pdata->sck = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio-sck", 0);
-	pdata->miso = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio-miso", 0);
-	pdata->mosi = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio-mosi", 0);
+	ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio-sck", 0);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "gpio-sck property not found\n");
+		goto error_free;
+	}
+	pdata->sck = ret;
+
+	ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio-miso", 0);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "gpio-miso property not found, switching to no-rx mode\n");
+		pdata->miso = SPI_GPIO_NO_MISO;
+	} else
+		pdata->miso = ret;
+
+	ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "gpio-mosi", 0);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_info(&pdev->dev, "gpio-mosi property not found, switching to no-tx mode\n");
+		pdata->mosi = SPI_GPIO_NO_MOSI;
+	} else
+		pdata->mosi = ret;
 
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-chipselects", &tmp);
 	if (ret < 0) {