Message ID | 1360049762-6349-3-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
2013/02/05 16:36, liguang wrote: > acpi_numa is used to prevent srat table > being parsed, seems a little miss-named, > if 'noacpi' was specified by cmdline and > CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA was enabled, acpi_numa > will be operated directly from everywhere > it needed to disable/enable numa in acpi > mode which was a bad thing, so, try to > export a fuction to get srat table > enable/disable info. > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- Hmm. Did you test the patch? By the patch, srat_disable() returns false(0) or 1. As a result, acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(), acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() and acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() go wrong at following if sentence. --- if (srat_disable()) return -1; --- When you change a return value of function, you should check othe functions which use it carefully. And if you use acpi_numa as bool, you should use "acpi_numa = true" instead of "acpi_numa = 1" Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c | 17 +++++++++++------ > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > index b31bf97..449e12a 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { } > #define ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT 1 > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > -extern int acpi_numa; > +extern void disable_acpi_numa(void); > extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void); > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */ > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c > index cdd0da9..8d7f3f8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c > @@ -24,22 +24,27 @@ > #include <asm/apic.h> > #include <asm/uv/uv.h> > > -int acpi_numa __initdata; > +static bool acpi_numa __initdata; > > static __init int setup_node(int pxm) > { > return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); > } > > -static __init void bad_srat(void) > +void __init disable_acpi_numa(void) > { > - printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n"); > - acpi_numa = -1; > + acpi_numa = false; > } > > -static __init inline int srat_disabled(void) > +static void __init bad_srat(void) > { > - return acpi_numa < 0; > + disable_acpi_numa(); > + printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT will not be used.\n"); > +} > + > +static bool __init srat_disabled(void) > +{ > + return acpi_numa; > } > > /* Callback for SLIT parsing */ > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > index 245a4ba..1ebc907 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __init int numa_setup(char *opt) > #endif > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > if (!strncmp(opt, "noacpi", 6)) > - acpi_numa = -1; > + disable_acpi_numa(); > #endif > return 0; > } > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > index 657eca9..3636bc6 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void) > * any NUMA information the kernel tries to get from ACPI will > * be meaningless. Prevent it from trying. > */ > - acpi_numa = -1; > + disable_acpi_numa(); > #endif > > /* Don't do the full vcpu_info placement stuff until we have a > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
? 2013-02-05?? 16:55 +0900?Yasuaki Ishimatsu??? > 2013/02/05 16:36, liguang wrote: > > acpi_numa is used to prevent srat table > > being parsed, seems a little miss-named, > > if 'noacpi' was specified by cmdline and > > CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA was enabled, acpi_numa > > will be operated directly from everywhere > > it needed to disable/enable numa in acpi > > mode which was a bad thing, so, try to > > export a fuction to get srat table > > enable/disable info. > > > > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > > --- > > Hmm. Did you test the patch? > By the patch, srat_disable() returns false(0) or 1. As a result, > acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(), acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() > and acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() go wrong at following if sentence. > > --- > if (srat_disable()) > return -1; > --- > > When you change a return value of function, you should check othe > functions which use it carefully. > > And if you use acpi_numa as bool, you should use "acpi_numa = true" > instead of "acpi_numa = 1" Good observation! maybe I'm a little hurry to go for dining, :) Thanks! will fix. > > Thanks, > Yasuaki Ishimatsu > > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +- > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c | 17 +++++++++++------ > > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +- > > arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > > index b31bf97..449e12a 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { } > > #define ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT 1 > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > > -extern int acpi_numa; > > +extern void disable_acpi_numa(void); > > extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void); > > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */ > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c > > index cdd0da9..8d7f3f8 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c > > @@ -24,22 +24,27 @@ > > #include <asm/apic.h> > > #include <asm/uv/uv.h> > > > > -int acpi_numa __initdata; > > +static bool acpi_numa __initdata; > > > > static __init int setup_node(int pxm) > > { > > return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); > > } > > > > -static __init void bad_srat(void) > > +void __init disable_acpi_numa(void) > > { > > - printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n"); > > - acpi_numa = -1; > > + acpi_numa = false; > > } > > > > -static __init inline int srat_disabled(void) > > +static void __init bad_srat(void) > > { > > - return acpi_numa < 0; > > + disable_acpi_numa(); > > + printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT will not be used.\n"); > > +} > > + > > +static bool __init srat_disabled(void) > > +{ > > + return acpi_numa; > > } > > > > /* Callback for SLIT parsing */ > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > > index 245a4ba..1ebc907 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c > > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __init int numa_setup(char *opt) > > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA > > if (!strncmp(opt, "noacpi", 6)) > > - acpi_numa = -1; > > + disable_acpi_numa(); > > #endif > > return 0; > > } > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > > index 657eca9..3636bc6 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > > @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void) > > * any NUMA information the kernel tries to get from ACPI will > > * be meaningless. Prevent it from trying. > > */ > > - acpi_numa = -1; > > + disable_acpi_numa(); > > #endif > > > > /* Don't do the full vcpu_info placement stuff until we have a > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2013/02/05 16:55, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > 2013/02/05 16:36, liguang wrote: >> acpi_numa is used to prevent srat table >> being parsed, seems a little miss-named, >> if 'noacpi' was specified by cmdline and >> CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA was enabled, acpi_numa >> will be operated directly from everywhere >> it needed to disable/enable numa in acpi >> mode which was a bad thing, so, try to >> export a fuction to get srat table >> enable/disable info. >> >> Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- > > Hmm. Did you test the patch? > By the patch, srat_disable() returns false(0) or 1. As a result, > acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(), acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() > and acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() go wrong at following if sentence. > > --- > if (srat_disable()) > return -1; > --- > > When you change a return value of function, you should check othe > functions which use it carefully. > > And if you use acpi_numa as bool, you should use "acpi_numa = true" > instead of "acpi_numa = 1" x86_acpi_numa_init() also goes wrong. > > Thanks, > Yasuaki Ishimatsu > >> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +- >> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c | 17 +++++++++++------ >> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +- >> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- >> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h >> index b31bf97..449e12a 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h >> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { } >> #define ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT 1 >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA >> -extern int acpi_numa; >> +extern void disable_acpi_numa(void); >> extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void); >> #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */ >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c >> index cdd0da9..8d7f3f8 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c >> @@ -24,22 +24,27 @@ >> #include <asm/apic.h> >> #include <asm/uv/uv.h> >> >> -int acpi_numa __initdata; >> +static bool acpi_numa __initdata; >> >> static __init int setup_node(int pxm) >> { >> return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); >> } >> >> -static __init void bad_srat(void) >> +void __init disable_acpi_numa(void) >> { >> - printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n"); >> - acpi_numa = -1; >> + acpi_numa = false; >> } >> >> -static __init inline int srat_disabled(void) >> +static void __init bad_srat(void) >> { >> - return acpi_numa < 0; >> + disable_acpi_numa(); >> + printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT will not be used.\n"); >> +} >> + >> +static bool __init srat_disabled(void) >> +{ >> + return acpi_numa; return !acpi_numa Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu >> } >> >> /* Callback for SLIT parsing */ >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c >> index 245a4ba..1ebc907 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c >> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __init int numa_setup(char *opt) >> #endif >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA >> if (!strncmp(opt, "noacpi", 6)) >> - acpi_numa = -1; >> + disable_acpi_numa(); >> #endif >> return 0; >> } >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c >> index 657eca9..3636bc6 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c >> @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void) >> * any NUMA information the kernel tries to get from ACPI will >> * be meaningless. Prevent it from trying. >> */ >> - acpi_numa = -1; >> + disable_acpi_numa(); >> #endif >> >> /* Don't do the full vcpu_info placement stuff until we have a >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h index b31bf97..449e12a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { } #define ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT 1 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA -extern int acpi_numa; +extern void disable_acpi_numa(void); extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void); #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c index cdd0da9..8d7f3f8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c @@ -24,22 +24,27 @@ #include <asm/apic.h> #include <asm/uv/uv.h> -int acpi_numa __initdata; +static bool acpi_numa __initdata; static __init int setup_node(int pxm) { return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); } -static __init void bad_srat(void) +void __init disable_acpi_numa(void) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT not used.\n"); - acpi_numa = -1; + acpi_numa = false; } -static __init inline int srat_disabled(void) +static void __init bad_srat(void) { - return acpi_numa < 0; + disable_acpi_numa(); + printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: SRAT will not be used.\n"); +} + +static bool __init srat_disabled(void) +{ + return acpi_numa; } /* Callback for SLIT parsing */ diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 245a4ba..1ebc907 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static __init int numa_setup(char *opt) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA if (!strncmp(opt, "noacpi", 6)) - acpi_numa = -1; + disable_acpi_numa(); #endif return 0; } diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c index 657eca9..3636bc6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void) * any NUMA information the kernel tries to get from ACPI will * be meaningless. Prevent it from trying. */ - acpi_numa = -1; + disable_acpi_numa(); #endif /* Don't do the full vcpu_info placement stuff until we have a
acpi_numa is used to prevent srat table being parsed, seems a little miss-named, if 'noacpi' was specified by cmdline and CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA was enabled, acpi_numa will be operated directly from everywhere it needed to disable/enable numa in acpi mode which was a bad thing, so, try to export a fuction to get srat table enable/disable info. Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/acpi/srat.c | 17 +++++++++++------ arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +- arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)