| Message ID | 1360179562-19950-3-git-send-email-amit.daniel@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 7 February 2013 01:09, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote: > Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing > parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq > table. > > Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi > index 024269d..b20b517 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi > @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ > > }; > > + cpufreq@160000 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq"; > + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>; > + interrupts = <0 57 0>; > + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000 > + 1000000 975000 > + 800000 925000 >; > + }; > + I think cpufreq_tbl should be part of the cpu node as it's the property of the cpu. Please refer cpufreq-cpu0 and spear-cpufreq. > serial@B0000 { > compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; > reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>; > -- > 1.7.10.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> wrote: > On 7 February 2013 01:09, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote: >> Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing >> parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq >> table. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >> index 024269d..b20b517 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >> @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ >> >> }; >> >> + cpufreq@160000 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq"; >> + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>; >> + interrupts = <0 57 0>; >> + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000 >> + 1000000 975000 >> + 800000 925000 >; >> + }; >> + > > I think cpufreq_tbl should be part of the cpu node as it's the > property of the cpu. > Please refer cpufreq-cpu0 and spear-cpufreq. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/15364. In this thread same discussion followed. I am not sure what is the correct way but looks like Kukjin concluded this with a timer node separate from the CPU code. Thanks, Amit Daniel > >> serial@B0000 { >> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >> reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>; >> -- >> 1.7.10.4 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 8 February 2013 00:03, amit kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Inderpal Singh > <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 7 February 2013 01:09, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote: >>> Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing >>> parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq >>> table. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>> index 024269d..b20b517 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>> @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ >>> >>> }; >>> >>> + cpufreq@160000 { >>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq"; >>> + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>; >>> + interrupts = <0 57 0>; >>> + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000 >>> + 1000000 975000 >>> + 800000 925000 >; >>> + }; >>> + >> >> I think cpufreq_tbl should be part of the cpu node as it's the >> property of the cpu. >> Please refer cpufreq-cpu0 and spear-cpufreq. > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/15364. > In this thread same discussion followed. I am not sure what is the > correct way but looks like Kukjin concluded this with a timer node > separate from the CPU code. > I am only talking about cpufreq_tbl and its nothing but operating points for the cpus. It seems its agreed upon to add operating-points to cpu node as being done by all other platforms like imx6q, am33xx, cpufreq-cpu0 and spear. Thanks, Inder > Thanks, > Amit Daniel >> >>> serial@B0000 { >>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >>> reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>; >>> -- >>> 1.7.10.4 >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Inderpal Singh <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> wrote: > On 8 February 2013 00:03, amit kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Inderpal Singh >> <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On 7 February 2013 01:09, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote: >>>> Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing >>>> parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq >>>> table. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>>> index 024269d..b20b517 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>>> @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ >>>> >>>> }; >>>> >>>> + cpufreq@160000 { >>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq"; >>>> + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>; >>>> + interrupts = <0 57 0>; >>>> + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000 >>>> + 1000000 975000 >>>> + 800000 925000 >; >>>> + }; >>>> + >>> >>> I think cpufreq_tbl should be part of the cpu node as it's the >>> property of the cpu. >>> Please refer cpufreq-cpu0 and spear-cpufreq. >> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/15364. >> In this thread same discussion followed. I am not sure what is the >> correct way but looks like Kukjin concluded this with a timer node >> separate from the CPU code. >> > > I am only talking about cpufreq_tbl and its nothing but operating > points for the cpus. It seems its agreed upon to add operating-points > to cpu node as being done by all other platforms like imx6q, am33xx, > cpufreq-cpu0 and spear. Even timer, GIC, cpufreq tbl, pmu etc are all cpu properties. But the problem is whether to put them in cpu0 or repeat same information in all cpu nodes as it is common to all cpu's and not just cpu0. So as Kukjin kim has put the timer node outside the cpu node so i also followed the same convention. Mr Kim, Any issue in this approach? Thanks, Amit Daniel > > Thanks, > Inder > >> Thanks, >> Amit Daniel >>> >>>> serial@B0000 { >>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >>>> reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>; >>>> -- >>>> 1.7.10.4 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 12 February 2013 06:42, amit kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Inderpal Singh > <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 8 February 2013 00:03, amit kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Inderpal Singh >>> <inderpal.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On 7 February 2013 01:09, Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> wrote: >>>>> Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing >>>>> parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq >>>>> table. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>>>> index 024269d..b20b517 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi >>>>> @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ >>>>> >>>>> }; >>>>> >>>>> + cpufreq@160000 { >>>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq"; >>>>> + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>; >>>>> + interrupts = <0 57 0>; >>>>> + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000 >>>>> + 1000000 975000 >>>>> + 800000 925000 >; >>>>> + }; >>>>> + >>>> >>>> I think cpufreq_tbl should be part of the cpu node as it's the >>>> property of the cpu. >>>> Please refer cpufreq-cpu0 and spear-cpufreq. >>> >>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/15364. >>> In this thread same discussion followed. I am not sure what is the >>> correct way but looks like Kukjin concluded this with a timer node >>> separate from the CPU code. >>> >> >> I am only talking about cpufreq_tbl and its nothing but operating >> points for the cpus. It seems its agreed upon to add operating-points >> to cpu node as being done by all other platforms like imx6q, am33xx, >> cpufreq-cpu0 and spear. > > Even timer, GIC, cpufreq tbl, pmu etc are all cpu properties. But the > problem is whether to put them in cpu0 or repeat same information in > all cpu nodes as it is common to all cpu's and not just cpu0. So as You don't have to repeat the same cpufreq_tbl for all cpu nodes. Having table in only cpu0 node is sufficient as being done in other platforms. Thanks, Inder > Kukjin kim has put the timer node outside the cpu node so i also > followed the same convention. > > Mr Kim, > Any issue in this approach? > > Thanks, > Amit Daniel >> >> Thanks, >> Inder >> >>> Thanks, >>> Amit Daniel >>>> >>>>> serial@B0000 { >>>>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; >>>>> reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>; >>>>> -- >>>>> 1.7.10.4 >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>>> -- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi index 024269d..b20b517 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi @@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ }; + cpufreq@160000 { + compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-cpufreq"; + reg = <0x160000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <0 57 0>; + cpufreq_tbl = < 1200000 1025000 + 1000000 975000 + 800000 925000 >; + }; + serial@B0000 { compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-uart"; reg = <0xB0000 0x1000>;
Add cpufreq controller device node for Exynos5440 SoC for passing parameters like controller base address, interrupt and cpufreq table. Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)