[v2,3/3] ARM: tegra: Unify Device tree board files

Commit Message

Hiroshi DOYU Feb. 13, 2013, 6:12 a.m. UTC

Stephen Warren <[e-mail]> wrote @ Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:35:56 +0100:

> However I'd like to avoid changing the body of those two functions at
> all if possible, since I hope the PCIe driver rework will be merged in
> 3.10, and that will allow the Harmony and TrimSlice init functions to be
> removed entirely. I'd rather not have conflicts with the removal patch.
> 
> > Since we are not going to add any other board specfic init functions, you
> > can also unroll the loop and put everything into tegra_dt_init_late:
> 
> That's not necessarily true. While we certainly don't plan to, I don't
> think we can rule it out; after all, we don't have rfkill bindings and
> yet other boards will need them.

Considering the above points,

- The Harmony and TrimSlice init functions will be removed entirely
  so soon that we want to avoid those merge conflicts as much as
  possible.
- We may still need board specific init, especially for rfkill.
- We want to build any combination of Tegra{20,30,114}, 2^3 - 1 == 7.

The patch for "tegra.c" would be as below.

Should I still keep the name, "tegra20_auxdata_lookup" to avoid
any conflicts or "tegra_auxdata_lookup" would be ok for merge?

Comments

Stephen Warren Feb. 13, 2013, 4:50 p.m. UTC | #1

On 02/12/2013 11:12 PM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Stephen Warren <[e-mail]> wrote @ Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:35:56 +0100:
> 
>> However I'd like to avoid changing the body of those two functions at
>> all if possible, since I hope the PCIe driver rework will be merged in
>> 3.10, and that will allow the Harmony and TrimSlice init functions to be
>> removed entirely. I'd rather not have conflicts with the removal patch.
>>
>>> Since we are not going to add any other board specfic init functions, you
>>> can also unroll the loop and put everything into tegra_dt_init_late:
>>
>> That's not necessarily true. While we certainly don't plan to, I don't
>> think we can rule it out; after all, we don't have rfkill bindings and
>> yet other boards will need them.
> 
> Considering the above points,
> 
> - The Harmony and TrimSlice init functions will be removed entirely
>   so soon that we want to avoid those merge conflicts as much as
>   possible.
> - We may still need board specific init, especially for rfkill.
> - We want to build any combination of Tegra{20,30,114}, 2^3 - 1 == 7.
> 
> The patch for "tegra.c" would be as below.
> 
> Should I still keep the name, "tegra20_auxdata_lookup" to avoid
> any conflicts or "tegra_auxdata_lookup" would be ok for merge?

Yes, avoiding the rename of the auxdata table might be a good idea.

Aside from that, I think the patch you gave looks fine.

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
index fca18e9..fd4412d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 /*
- * nVidia Tegra device tree board support
+ * NVIDIA Tegra SoC device tree board support
  *
+ * Copyright (C) 2011, 2013, NVIDIA Corporation
  * Copyright (C) 2010 Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
  * Copyright (C) 2010 Google, Inc.
  *
@@ -67,7 +68,7 @@  static struct tegra_ehci_platform_data tegra_ehci3_pdata = {
 	.vbus_gpio = -1,
 };
 
-static struct of_dev_auxdata tegra20_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
+static struct of_dev_auxdata tegra_auxdata_lookup[] __initdata = {
 	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5000000, "tegra-ehci.0",
 		       &tegra_ehci1_pdata),
 	OF_DEV_AUXDATA("nvidia,tegra20-ehci", 0xC5004000, "tegra-ehci.1",
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@  static void __init tegra_dt_init(void)
 	 * devices
 	 */
 	of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table,
-				tegra20_auxdata_lookup, NULL);
+				tegra_auxdata_lookup, NULL);
 }
 
 static void __init trimslice_init(void)
@@ -111,7 +112,8 @@  static void __init harmony_init(void)
 
 static void __init paz00_init(void)
 {
-	tegra_paz00_wifikill_init();
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC))
+		tegra_paz00_wifikill_init();
 }
 
 static struct {
@@ -137,12 +139,14 @@  static void __init tegra_dt_init_late(void)
 	}
 }
 
-static const char *tegra20_dt_board_compat[] = {
+static const char * const tegra_dt_board_compat[] = {
+	"nvidia,tegra114",
+	"nvidia,tegra30",
 	"nvidia,tegra20",
 	NULL
 };
 
-DT_MACHINE_START(TEGRA_DT, "nVidia Tegra20 (Flattened Device Tree)")
+DT_MACHINE_START(TEGRA_DT, "NVIDIA Tegra SoC (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.map_io		= tegra_map_common_io,
 	.smp		= smp_ops(tegra_smp_ops),
 	.init_early	= tegra_init_early,
@@ -151,5 +155,5 @@  DT_MACHINE_START(TEGRA_DT, "nVidia Tegra20 (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.init_machine	= tegra_dt_init,
 	.init_late	= tegra_dt_init_late,
 	.restart	= tegra_assert_system_reset,
-	.dt_compat	= tegra20_dt_board_compat,
+	.dt_compat	= tegra_dt_board_compat,
 MACHINE_END