Message ID | 49EBD5EC.4040905@jp.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:54:52AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote: > - Remove unused msi/msix_enable/disable macros. > User should use msi/msix_set_enable() functions instead. I don't think they were ever intended for drivers; I think they were supposed to be helper macros for msi.c. Regardless, deleting them is the right thing to do. > - Remove unused msix_mask/unmask/pending macros. > These macros are useless because they are not based on any of > the PCI Local Bus Specifications properly. > It seems that they were written based on a draft of PCI spec, > and that the draft was the MSI-X ECN that underwent membership > review in September 2002. > (* In the draft, the size of a entry in MSI-X table was 64bit, > containing 32bit message data and DWORD aligned lower address > plus a pending bit and a mask bit.(30+1+1bit) The higher > address was placed in MSI-X capability structure and shared > by all entries.) I think you're right. Unfortunately, the old MSI-X ECN was actually incorporated into a version of the PCI 3.0 spec -- I have a document here named pci3.0-081202.pdf which has exactly the layout you describe. So it probably gained wider currency than it should have. > - Remove PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BITMASK. > This definition also come from the draft ECN. Yep. > Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:54:52 +0900 Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Impact: cleanup, spec compliance > > This patch does: > > - Remove unused msi/msix_enable/disable macros. > User should use msi/msix_set_enable() functions instead. > > - Remove unused msix_mask/unmask/pending macros. > These macros are useless because they are not based on any of > the PCI Local Bus Specifications properly. > It seems that they were written based on a draft of PCI spec, > and that the draft was the MSI-X ECN that underwent membership > review in September 2002. > (* In the draft, the size of a entry in MSI-X table was 64bit, > containing 32bit message data and DWORD aligned lower address > plus a pending bit and a mask bit.(30+1+1bit) The higher > address was placed in MSI-X capability structure and shared > by all entries.) > > - Remove PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BITMASK. > This definition also come from the draft ECN. > > Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Applied to my linux-next branch, thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.h b/drivers/pci/msi.h index 71f4df2..4fed592 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.h +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.h @@ -19,18 +19,12 @@ ( (is64bit == 1) ? base+PCI_MSI_DATA_64 : base+PCI_MSI_DATA_32 ) #define msi_mask_bits_reg(base, is64bit) \ ( (is64bit == 1) ? base+PCI_MSI_MASK_BIT : base+PCI_MSI_MASK_BIT-4) -#define msi_disable(control) control &= ~PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE #define is_64bit_address(control) (!!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)) #define is_mask_bit_support(control) (!!(control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_MASKBIT)) #define msix_table_offset_reg(base) (base + 0x04) #define msix_pba_offset_reg(base) (base + 0x08) -#define msix_enable(control) control |= PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE -#define msix_disable(control) control &= ~PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE #define msix_table_size(control) ((control & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE)+1) -#define multi_msix_capable msix_table_size -#define msix_unmask(address) (address & ~PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BITMASK) -#define msix_mask(address) (address | PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BITMASK) -#define msix_is_pending(address) (address & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_PENDMASK) +#define multi_msix_capable(control) msix_table_size((control)) #endif /* MSI_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/linux/pci_regs.h index e4d08c1..ad57aa8 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci_regs.h +++ b/include/linux/pci_regs.h @@ -304,7 +304,6 @@ #define PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE (1 << 15) #define PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL (1 << 14) #define PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BIRMASK (7 << 0) -#define PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BITMASK (1 << 0) /* CompactPCI Hotswap Register */
Impact: cleanup, spec compliance This patch does: - Remove unused msi/msix_enable/disable macros. User should use msi/msix_set_enable() functions instead. - Remove unused msix_mask/unmask/pending macros. These macros are useless because they are not based on any of the PCI Local Bus Specifications properly. It seems that they were written based on a draft of PCI spec, and that the draft was the MSI-X ECN that underwent membership review in September 2002. (* In the draft, the size of a entry in MSI-X table was 64bit, containing 32bit message data and DWORD aligned lower address plus a pending bit and a mask bit.(30+1+1bit) The higher address was placed in MSI-X capability structure and shared by all entries.) - Remove PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BITMASK. This definition also come from the draft ECN. Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> --- drivers/pci/msi.h | 8 +------- include/linux/pci_regs.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)