Message ID | 1365444377-9959-6-git-send-email-thomas@cozybit.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 11:06 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote: > Some drivers (like ath9k_htc) will take a mutex in > rate_control_rate_update(), so drop the sta lock before we > get there. That driver is broken then. rate_control_rate_update() can be called from the RX path where this also isn't allowed. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 11:38 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 11:06 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote: > > Some drivers (like ath9k_htc) will take a mutex in > > rate_control_rate_update(), so drop the sta lock before we > > get there. > > That driver is broken then. rate_control_rate_update() can be called > from the RX path where this also isn't allowed. * @sta_rc_update: Notifies the driver of changes to the bitrates that can be * used to transmit to the station. The changes are advertised with bits * from &enum ieee80211_rate_control_changed and the values are reflected * in the station data. This callback should only be used when the driver * uses hardware rate control (%IEEE80211_HW_HAS_RATE_CONTROL) since * otherwise the rate control algorithm is notified directly. * Must be atomic. (note last line) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 11:38 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 11:06 -0700, Thomas Pedersen wrote: >> > Some drivers (like ath9k_htc) will take a mutex in >> > rate_control_rate_update(), so drop the sta lock before we >> > get there. >> >> That driver is broken then. rate_control_rate_update() can be called >> from the RX path where this also isn't allowed. > > * @sta_rc_update: Notifies the driver of changes to the bitrates that > can be > * used to transmit to the station. The changes are advertised with > bits > * from &enum ieee80211_rate_control_changed and the values are > reflected > * in the station data. This callback should only be used when the > driver > * uses hardware rate control (%IEEE80211_HW_HAS_RATE_CONTROL) > since > * otherwise the rate control algorithm is notified directly. > * Must be atomic. > > (note last line) Ah alright. Thanks.
diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c index cdd4183..ca284ee 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c +++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c @@ -379,8 +379,10 @@ static void mesh_sta_info_init(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, sta->last_rx = jiffies; /* rates and capabilities don't change during peering */ - if (sta->plink_state == NL80211_PLINK_ESTAB) - goto out; + if (sta->plink_state == NL80211_PLINK_ESTAB) { + spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock); + return; + } if (sta->sta.supp_rates[band] != rates) changed |= IEEE80211_RC_SUPP_RATES_CHANGED; @@ -398,13 +400,12 @@ static void mesh_sta_info_init(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, changed |= IEEE80211_RC_BW_CHANGED; sta->sta.bandwidth = IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_20; } + spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock); if (insert) rate_control_rate_init(sta); else rate_control_rate_update(local, sband, sta, changed); -out: - spin_unlock_bh(&sta->lock); } static struct sta_info *
Some drivers (like ath9k_htc) will take a mutex in rate_control_rate_update(), so drop the sta lock before we get there. Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@cozybit.com> Can go towards 3.9. --- net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)