Message ID | 1366824429-26652-3-git-send-email-nschichan@freebox.fr (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 04/24/2013 07:27 PM, Nicolas Schichan wrote: > This is in preparation of bpf_jit support for seccomp filters. Please also CC the netdev list for BPF related patches. Just to give you a heads-up, this might likely lead to a merge conflict with the net-next tree (commit 79617801ea0c0e66, "filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output"). > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> > --- > arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c > index a0bd8a7..bb66a2b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c > +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c > @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ > #define FLAG_NEED_X_RESET (1 << 0) > > struct jit_ctx { > - const struct sk_filter *skf; > + unsigned short prog_len; > + struct sock_filter *prog_insns; > unsigned idx; > unsigned prologue_bytes; > int ret0_fp_idx; > @@ -131,8 +132,8 @@ static u16 saved_regs(struct jit_ctx *ctx) > { > u16 ret = 0; > > - if ((ctx->skf->len > 1) || > - (ctx->skf->insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A)) > + if ((ctx->prog_len > 1) || > + (ctx->prog_insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A)) > ret |= 1 << r_A; > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > @@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ static inline bool is_load_to_a(u16 inst) > static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx) > { > u16 reg_set = saved_regs(ctx); > - u16 first_inst = ctx->skf->insns[0].code; > + u16 first_inst = ctx->prog_insns[0].code; > u16 off; > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static u16 imm_offset(u32 k, struct jit_ctx *ctx) > ctx->imms[i] = k; > > /* constants go just after the epilogue */ > - offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->skf->len]; > + offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->prog_len]; > offset += ctx->prologue_bytes; > offset += ctx->epilogue_bytes; > offset += i * 4; > @@ -419,7 +420,7 @@ static inline void emit_err_ret(u8 cond, struct jit_ctx *ctx) > emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, ARM_R0), ctx); > } else { > _emit(cond, ARM_MOV_I(ARM_R0, 0), ctx); > - _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->skf->len, ctx)), ctx); > + _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->prog_len, ctx)), ctx); > } > } > > @@ -469,14 +470,13 @@ static inline void update_on_xread(struct jit_ctx *ctx) > static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx) > { > void *load_func[] = {jit_get_skb_b, jit_get_skb_h, jit_get_skb_w}; > - const struct sk_filter *prog = ctx->skf; > const struct sock_filter *inst; > unsigned i, load_order, off, condt; > int imm12; > u32 k; > > - for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) { > - inst = &(prog->insns[i]); > + for (i = 0; i < ctx->prog_len; i++) { > + inst = &(ctx->prog_insns[i]); > /* K as an immediate value operand */ > k = inst->k; > > @@ -769,8 +769,8 @@ cmp_x: > ctx->ret0_fp_idx = i; > emit_mov_i(ARM_R0, k, ctx); > b_epilogue: > - if (i != ctx->skf->len - 1) > - emit(ARM_B(b_imm(prog->len, ctx)), ctx); > + if (i != ctx->prog_len - 1) > + emit(ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->prog_len, ctx)), ctx); > break; > case BPF_S_MISC_TAX: > /* X = A */ > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ b_epilogue: > } > > > -void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > +static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct jit_ctx *out_ctx) > { > struct jit_ctx ctx; > unsigned tmp_idx; > @@ -867,11 +867,10 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > if (!bpf_jit_enable) > return; > > - memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); > - ctx.skf = fp; > + ctx = *out_ctx; > ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1; > > - ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.skf->len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); > + ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.prog_len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); > if (ctx.offsets == NULL) > return; > > @@ -921,13 +920,26 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "BPF JIT code: ", > DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 16, 4, ctx.target, > alloc_size, false); > - > - fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; > out: > kfree(ctx.offsets); > + > + *out_ctx = ctx; > return; > } > > +void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > +{ > + struct jit_ctx ctx; > + > + memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); > + ctx.prog_len = fp->len; > + ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns; > + > + __bpf_jit_compile(&ctx); > + if (ctx.target) > + fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; > +} > + > static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work) > { > module_free(NULL, work); >
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 19:27:08 Nicolas Schichan wrote: > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ b_epilogue: > } > > > -void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > +static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct jit_ctx *out_ctx) > { > struct jit_ctx ctx; > unsigned tmp_idx; > @@ -867,11 +867,10 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > if (!bpf_jit_enable) > return; > > - memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); > - ctx.skf = fp; > + ctx = *out_ctx; > ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1; > > - ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.skf->len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); > + ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.prog_len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); > if (ctx.offsets == NULL) > return; > > @@ -921,13 +920,26 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) > print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "BPF JIT code: ", > DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 16, 4, ctx.target, > alloc_size, false); > - > - fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; > out: > kfree(ctx.offsets); > + > + *out_ctx = ctx; > return; This part of the patch, in combination with 79617801e "filter: bpf_jit_comp: refactor and unify BPF JIT image dump output" is now causing build errors in linux-next: arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c: In function '__bpf_jit_compile': arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c:930:16: error: 'fp' undeclared (first use in this function) bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target); ^ Arnd
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c index a0bd8a7..bb66a2b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ #define FLAG_NEED_X_RESET (1 << 0) struct jit_ctx { - const struct sk_filter *skf; + unsigned short prog_len; + struct sock_filter *prog_insns; unsigned idx; unsigned prologue_bytes; int ret0_fp_idx; @@ -131,8 +132,8 @@ static u16 saved_regs(struct jit_ctx *ctx) { u16 ret = 0; - if ((ctx->skf->len > 1) || - (ctx->skf->insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A)) + if ((ctx->prog_len > 1) || + (ctx->prog_insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A)) ret |= 1 << r_A; #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER @@ -181,7 +182,7 @@ static inline bool is_load_to_a(u16 inst) static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx) { u16 reg_set = saved_regs(ctx); - u16 first_inst = ctx->skf->insns[0].code; + u16 first_inst = ctx->prog_insns[0].code; u16 off; #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static u16 imm_offset(u32 k, struct jit_ctx *ctx) ctx->imms[i] = k; /* constants go just after the epilogue */ - offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->skf->len]; + offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->prog_len]; offset += ctx->prologue_bytes; offset += ctx->epilogue_bytes; offset += i * 4; @@ -419,7 +420,7 @@ static inline void emit_err_ret(u8 cond, struct jit_ctx *ctx) emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, ARM_R0), ctx); } else { _emit(cond, ARM_MOV_I(ARM_R0, 0), ctx); - _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->skf->len, ctx)), ctx); + _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->prog_len, ctx)), ctx); } } @@ -469,14 +470,13 @@ static inline void update_on_xread(struct jit_ctx *ctx) static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx) { void *load_func[] = {jit_get_skb_b, jit_get_skb_h, jit_get_skb_w}; - const struct sk_filter *prog = ctx->skf; const struct sock_filter *inst; unsigned i, load_order, off, condt; int imm12; u32 k; - for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) { - inst = &(prog->insns[i]); + for (i = 0; i < ctx->prog_len; i++) { + inst = &(ctx->prog_insns[i]); /* K as an immediate value operand */ k = inst->k; @@ -769,8 +769,8 @@ cmp_x: ctx->ret0_fp_idx = i; emit_mov_i(ARM_R0, k, ctx); b_epilogue: - if (i != ctx->skf->len - 1) - emit(ARM_B(b_imm(prog->len, ctx)), ctx); + if (i != ctx->prog_len - 1) + emit(ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->prog_len, ctx)), ctx); break; case BPF_S_MISC_TAX: /* X = A */ @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ b_epilogue: } -void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) +static void __bpf_jit_compile(struct jit_ctx *out_ctx) { struct jit_ctx ctx; unsigned tmp_idx; @@ -867,11 +867,10 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) if (!bpf_jit_enable) return; - memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); - ctx.skf = fp; + ctx = *out_ctx; ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1; - ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.skf->len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); + ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.prog_len + 1), GFP_KERNEL); if (ctx.offsets == NULL) return; @@ -921,13 +920,26 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) print_hex_dump(KERN_INFO, "BPF JIT code: ", DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS, 16, 4, ctx.target, alloc_size, false); - - fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; out: kfree(ctx.offsets); + + *out_ctx = ctx; return; } +void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp) +{ + struct jit_ctx ctx; + + memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx)); + ctx.prog_len = fp->len; + ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns; + + __bpf_jit_compile(&ctx); + if (ctx.target) + fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target; +} + static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work) { module_free(NULL, work);
This is in preparation of bpf_jit support for seccomp filters. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr> --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)